Council supports McKelvey Park flood basin

The Mountain View City Council appeared to support transforming McKelvey Park into a 15-foot-deep flood basin in a plan that would provide new baseball facilities there at no cost to the city.

Though no formal decision was made at the Tuesday night study session, comments from council members agreed with the concept as long as there were no unforeseen problems.

"I support this project (at McKelvey), I think it's a win-win," said Mayor Margaret Abe-Koga. The Santa Clara Valley Water District says the flood basin would help keep Permanente Creek from overflowing its banks in a major storm.

City manager Kevin Duggan said his staff would take a conceptual plan to the Parks and Recreation Commission and to a public hearing for the surrounding neighborhood to gather feedback before an official council vote on the concept. Duggan said it would be a significant amount of time before the council approves a detailed plan.

If the concept ever does make its way to fruition, the city "will have a great new amenity we can take advantage of," said council member Mike Kasperzak.

The Water District has already garnered support from the local Little League and other teams who use the two baseball fields at McKelvey. Elaine Spence, president of Mountain View Babe Ruth baseball, told the Voice that the concept was a "win-win" for flood control and for the teams happy to get new baseball facilities.

The "win-win" theme was hit on more than once Tuesday night.

"I don't know why this isn't a win-win -- it seems like it is," said council member Jac Siegel, who seemed to be the most concerned and critical of the six members present. (Although in the past she has been sharply critical of the proposal, council member Laura Macias recused herself from Tuesday's discussion due to the proximity of her home to McKelvey Park.)

According to the Water District, the McKelvey flood basin -- along with flood basins proposed for Blach Middle School and Rancho San Antonio in Los Altos and for the Cuesta Park Annex -- would help protect 2,250 properties in Mountain View in the event of a 100-year flood. The entire project would be funded by $38 million from a flood control measure passed by 70 percent of Mountain View residents in 2000, said Patrick Kwok, District Five director for the Water District.

While Macias and other community members have questioned the need for more flood control along Permanente Creek, council member John Inks, a former engineer, said he wasn't going to second guess the Water District's claims.

Council member Ronit Bryant said global warming and the resulting rise in sea level would mean that floods predicted once every 100 years could happen twice as often in the near future.

"I actually think the risk of flooding is likely to go up" because of global warming, Bryant said.

The concept was also supported by council member Tom Means, who countered complaints that the plan would ruin the park, which is covered by two baseball fields: "A lot of fields are sunken. The fields at Stanford are sunken. It is an easy way to get stands in."

Kasperzak pointed out that the alternative to the flood basins is a dam near Hansen-Permanente Quarry, which would have major consequences for wildlife in the area.

Siegel peppered Water District representatives with questions, such as whether there might be unforeseen hold-ups in the project due to unknown toxics in the soil; how much useable park land would be lost; the quality of the new fields; whether the reconstructed parking lot would be adequate; and whether toxics might get washed onto the baseball field during floods.

Water District engineer Afshin Rouhani said that at other flood basins, including one in Morgan Hill, toxics washing into the area has not been a concern. He added that it can take four to six weeks to clean a flood basin after a flood.

Floodwaters would enter McKelvey at the southwestern corner adjacent to the creek. Gravity, not pumps, would drain the basin back into the creek after the flood subsides.

SEE ALSO: Water District floats flood basin idea for McKelvey Park


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Scott S.
a resident of Shoreline West
on Aug 27, 2009 at 2:17 pm

This sounds great. Our house will be protected (maybe lowering our flood insurance rates), and teams get some upgraded fields.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by resident
a resident of another community
on Aug 27, 2009 at 5:07 pm

New ball fields sound ok, but we need real grass. None of this fake stuff that wears out, gets dirty and looks like crud. How will real grass do in a sunken field. And what about drainage from rains.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by faker
a resident of another community
on Aug 31, 2009 at 11:23 am

The fake stuff is now better than grass which is why more schools are switching from grass. The overuse of grass fields makes them unplayable. Jsut ask the soccer groups

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Draeger’s Los Altos eyes upgrades, expansion
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 2,783 views

Housing is for People
By Steve Levy | 18 comments | 1,757 views

College Visit: Lehigh and Lafayette
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 4 comments | 1,237 views

Is Coffee a Date?
By Laura Stec | 4 comments | 477 views

The Opposite of What You Don't Want
By Caroline Fleck | 0 comments | 339 views