News

Council approves new office building on Evelyn

The days are numbered for the Pacific Euro Hotel, which sits on one of two parcels now slated for a new four-story, 63,000-square-foot office building downtown.

On Tuesday, the City Council unanimously approved the office building for 871-891 Evelyn Ave., just west of Castro Street at Bryant Street and a stone's throw from the train station. It is about three times taller than the nearby buildings on the historic 100 block of Castro Street.

Council member Jac Siegel said he was not a fan of the building's modern design, which he said did not fit the downtown area. Other council members complained that the developer did not illustrate what the building would look like from the Castro Street area. But generally, the council was happy to have the development, which they said would allow growing companies located downtown to expand while staying in the area.

Developer Daniel Minkoff said the building would be for the high-end office market, and would meet high LEED standards for green design. He noted the use of high quality building materials, such as limestone, which would extend onto the sidewalk.

Council member Ronit Bryant was not so impressed, saying she had concerns with how the building would affect the "pedestrian experience" downtown.

"I will not be able to support the project without adding some living green" element, such as "a trellis or potted plants," Bryant said. "Otherwise what we're putting downtown is another blank wall."

A motion by Bryant to require some form of planting on the site as determined by the planning department failed in a 3-3 vote, with council member Means absent. That gave way to a compromise from city manager Kevin Duggan: Have the developer voluntarily do whatever is deemed possible for plants around the building, which leaves little room for greenery on the site.

Because the city's downtown precise plan encourages ground floor retail space, the project required a provisional use permit to allow office space on the ground floor. Council members were unsure there would be demand for retail on that portion of Evelyn, though the building could be modified to allow it in the future.

The building will have one level of underground parking, which allows for 34 spaces. Another 43 spaces of parking required for the project are in a nearby parking garage, which the city pays for through fees from downtown projects which commonly do not supply their own parking.

Downtown residents did not show up to oppose the project. In the past, residents of condos at 108 Bryant St. have expressed concerns about Pacific Euro Hotel's effect on their neighborhood.

Comments

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Kathy
a resident of Sylvan Park
on Nov 19, 2009 at 3:59 pm

I think it's great that they are getting rid of that sorry excuse for a hotel but three times higher than nearby buildings? Also....

- The City is letting the developer "voluntarily do whatever is deemed possible for plants around the building"? Developers never volunteer to do anything that is not going to put money in their pocket.

- Jac Siegel is not a fan of the building's modern design.

- council members complained that the developer did not illustrate what the building would look like from the Castro Street area.

- Ronit Bryant was not so impressed, saying she had concerns with how the building would affect the "pedestrian experience" downtown.

But it passed unanimously, so does the City have any say at all in the end result? Sounds like they are giving this developer carte blanche, or maybe there is more to this story?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Bertrand
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Nov 19, 2009 at 4:26 pm

Nice to see the councilors pandering about having nice environment on Evelyn. Have they ever actually been there?

Perhaps they might have noticed the decrepit parking strip on Evelyn along the train line with roots sticking through and the Caltrain dumping ground for unwanted construction material facing it. How about actually caring about tidying up the area instead shaking down captive developers? Too much work? Mountain View deserves better.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by dfb
a resident of Shoreline West
on Nov 19, 2009 at 6:22 pm

I just hope it does not sit vacant like so many small to medium sized office space currently for rent throughout the city.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by rem
a resident of another community
on Nov 23, 2009 at 1:38 pm

Why don't we have a honest City/County Council that will honestly say "Developer (Contractors) Lobbyists , Developer (Contractors), "donate to us and we will approve"!!!!"

It would be great if the City Council and all the other "Councils" and "Work Shops" learned a new word – NO or new phase – DISAPPROVED….

There is no sane reason for this except MONEY, MONEY, MONEY and not caring about the people of Mountain View or ANY of the other communities …..

Sound to me like DEVELOPMENT, DEVELOPMENT, DEVELOPMENT!!!! Gee, the CITY has messed up so much without looking back and LEARNING from the past..


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

I Told My Mom She's Dying
By Chandrama Anderson | 13 comments | 2,628 views

Grab a Bowl of Heaven soon in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 2,049 views

Quick Check List for UC Applications
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 1,405 views

Fancy Fast and Fun!
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 1,004 views

Palo Alto and Bay Area Election Facts and Thoughts on the Implications
By Steve Levy | 5 comments | 975 views