News

High-speed rail chalks up legal win

Judge Culhane dismisses Menlo Park residents' lawsuit

Even as news spread of a fresh lawsuit against high-speed rail, the beleaguered rail authority announced the dismissal of a different suit.

Filed in April by Menlo Park residents Morris Brown and attorney Mike Brady, the lawsuit asked the court to rule on how the California High-Speed Rail Authority can legally use $9.95 billion in bond funds.

The suit alleged that construction could not legally begin until the rail authority had enough money to finish what it started. According to court filings, the plaintiffs stated that since the project is "severely under-funded," starting construction would only waste the money.

The rail authority asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit in June, according to spokeswoman Rachel Wall, believing that it did not actually allege illegal conduct.

Sacramento Superior Court Judge Kevin Culhane sided with the rail authority on Sept. 21, calling the plaintiffs' claim "speculative" in his ruling.

"Although plaintiffs contend waste is imminent, the manner in which they have framed the requested relief reveals that plaintiffs are seeking an advisory opinion rather than an order that imminent waste be halted," the ruling stated.

Ms. Wall said that lawsuits over a massive infrastructure project like high-speed rail don't come as a surprise.

"We remain committed to working with the people in the communities statewide to help design the best project possible for the state," she said.

This was the second pro bono lawsuit Mr. Brady had filed against the rail agency, and the second dismissal.

The first suit, filed last year on behalf of Menlo Park City Council candidate Russ Peterson, asked the court to forbid the agency from starting work on the Peninsula segment without the consent of Union Pacific, which has ownership rights over the Caltrain corridor. That suit was dismissed in June.

Comments

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Member
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Sep 23, 2010 at 2:50 pm

I believe the bond amount is $9.95 Billion, not million.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Trillion
a resident of Jackson Park
on Sep 23, 2010 at 3:56 pm

If it's $9.95 million then it's SEVERELY underfunded.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Old Ben
a resident of Shoreline West
on Sep 24, 2010 at 9:46 am

If it's ten cents, it's ten cents wasted.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Andrea Gemmet
Mountain View Voice Editor
on Sep 24, 2010 at 10:25 am

Andrea Gemmet is a registered user.

Thanks for the catch -- it is $9.95 billion, not million.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Pine Source
a resident of The Crossings
on Sep 24, 2010 at 4:14 pm

We can see this Menlo Park resident use different excuses to find fault with the High Speed Rail Authority.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Member
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Sep 24, 2010 at 9:20 pm

Well, I'm not worried about $9.95 Billion. Not a single inch of high speed rail track will be laid.

Look at Bart to San Jose as a (non)example, or Bart to Oakland Airport for $480 million to go a few miles.

What I'm interested in is how the election was stolen. When I went to bed, the bond was losing with 80% percent reporting. When I woke up, the money was gone. And bonds couldn't be a worse way to fund a project.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by thetruth
a resident of another community
on Sep 25, 2010 at 8:58 am

Wrong the HSR bond was never loosing by 8o percent..unless they only had counted Atherton vote!! If the economy had not tanked it would have passed by an even larger margin..!! people that voted NO cant get that thru there head HSR is wanted!!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Old Ben
a resident of Shoreline West
on Sep 25, 2010 at 10:12 am

HSR is only wanted by the tax parasites who derive their incomes from it.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Rail good, HSR bad
a resident of Monta Loma
on Sep 29, 2010 at 1:43 pm

At least, residents in Menlo Park are speaking up a little more than here. Forget about the 9.95B bond; this thing is going to cost $43.6B if we believe HSRA, and $100B or more (mostly of OUR money) if we believe actual experts.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

I Told My Mom She's Dying
By Chandrama Anderson | 13 comments | 2,647 views

Grab a Bowl of Heaven soon in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 2,079 views

Quick Check List for UC Applications
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 1,438 views

Palo Alto and Bay Area Election Facts and Thoughts on the Implications
By Steve Levy | 7 comments | 1,031 views

Fancy Fast and Fun!
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 1,012 views