Zoning Administrator OKs Mayfield project

258-home plan on its way to City Council

The large Mayfield residential development is on its way to the City Council for a vote on June 21, thanks to a decision Wednesday by the zoning administrator.

Zoning administrator Peter Gilli recommended that the City Council approve the project, which has been scaled back to 258 homes for the the 27-acre site. The Council will consider a master plan for Mayfield on June 21 to allow up to 260 units. Detailed plans would come before the council in the fall, said City Planner Melinda Denis.

The proposal includes 3.62 acres of park space and a pedestrian tunnel under Central Expressway, which the City Council required in a previous 450-unit iteration of the project. The tunnel was estimated to cost $6 million.

No changes have been proposed to the 45 homes on a small western portion of the site in Palo Alto that were approved several years ago.

The project was perhaps the most contentious residential project in city history before the City Council approved 450 units at Mayfield for developer Toll Brothers in 2008. That design included two- and three-story homes and four- and five-story podium buildings atop parking garages, all in a neighborhood of mostly one-story Eichler homes. But recently Monta Loma neighborhood opposition to the project, once ear piercing, has become inaudible. Neighbors have been saying the new proposal -- which goes no higher than three stories – is a better fit for the neighborhood and will create far less traffic.

Some still have concerns about the site's beloved trees and the plans for a year-long demolition of the existing buildings -- once home to the Mayfield Mall -- which may occasionally close several streets through the site used by neighbors, Denis said.

Summit Land Partners agreed to take on the project last year and scaled the project back to fewer than 260 units, citing the financial risk of tying up funds in dense development during a recession.

Denis said the new project will follow new city regulations for water conservation and landscaping, likely saving significant quantities of water. Summit is proposing 613 new trees for the site, but will remove 163 trees, a few more than Toll Brothers had proposed. A lack of maintenance on the site by owner Hewlett Packard has caused several more trees to deteriorate, Denis said. Summit will also relocate 58 large redwood trees from the site.

The 3.62 acre park space is slightly larger than the the 3.59 acres the council approved in 2008. It is also relatively generous in size. At the lower housing density Summit proposes, the city's park space requirement would only be 1.59 acres, Denis said.


Like this comment
Posted by Nitpicker
a resident of Old Mountain View
on May 23, 2011 at 2:05 pm

I think we went through this before... It should be OKs not OK's.

Like this comment
Posted by Martin
a resident of Cuesta Park
on May 23, 2011 at 2:17 pm

The previous commenter would be wrong according to the Webster's Dictionary. The dictionary show "OK's" for both the verb and the noun.

Like this comment
Posted by bkengland
a resident of Whisman Station
on May 23, 2011 at 2:39 pm

It depends on the style guide the Voice uses. Nice to know that this is evidently the only contention so far regarding the proposed Mayfield project! ;-)

Like this comment
Posted by former mv resident
a resident of another community
on May 23, 2011 at 3:18 pm

Nitpicker and all the other grammar police........ get a life! These ridiculous comments are not what this forum was established for!!!

Like this comment
Posted by gcoladon
a resident of North Whisman
on May 23, 2011 at 4:42 pm

gcoladon is a registered user.

@ former MV resident:

Perhaps you should submit this situation to Joe Simitian's 'There ought to be a law' contest.

Like this comment
Posted by Hot Jobs
a resident of Gemello
on May 23, 2011 at 5:08 pm

I think that somebody is aiming to get a job as a proofreader at the Voice.

Like this comment
Posted by PickNitter
a resident of St. Francis Acres
on May 24, 2011 at 9:07 am

I think someone simply yearns to be relevant and this is how they try. Sad failure again, but funny to watch try.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

The Saddle Room – A True Friend of Kids
By Laura Stec | 2 comments | 2,090 views

Palo Alto: Pastis owner to open second French restaurant
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 1,265 views

The Four E's--Pope Francis and the Middle Class
By Steve Levy | 3 comments | 976 views

My College Mindset is Intrinsically Motivated
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 867 views

Radical Acceptance
By Caroline Fleck | 0 comments | 249 views