Diet-supplement distributor pays $1.5M settlement

Lead in products, false advertising were basis of District Attorney lawsuit against Iovate Health Sciences

A Canadian corporation and its American affiliate agreed to pay $1.5 million in civil penalties and costs after being sued by the Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office, Jeff Rosen, county district attorney announced Thursday (Jan. 5).

Dietary-supplement distributors Iovate Health Sciences, Inc., of Canada, and Iovate Health Sciences USA, Inc., were sued by several county DAs for false advertising and having lead in its dietary supplements, according to Rosen's office.

District attorney's offices in Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Napa, Alameda, Marin, Monterey, Orange, Shasta, Solano and Sonoma counties were part of the lawsuit.

The settlement pertains to Iovate products marketed and sold throughout California. Iovate companies will pay $1.2 million in civil penalties, which would provide support for the future enforcement of California consumer-protection laws. The agreement also pays $300,000 in investigative costs.

It is the second largest multi-county dietary supplement settlement in California history, Rosen's office said.

The lawsuit accused Iovate of making false and misleading representations to sell some of its products, including Accelis, nanoSLIM, Cold MD, Germ MD, EZ-Swallow Rapid-Tabs, Germ MD Effervescent Tablets, Allergy MD, and Allergy MD Rapid-Tabs.

District attorneys' office investigations also revealed that Iovate was marketing and selling a product containing lead in violation of California's Proposition 65. The law requires warning labels on all products containing more than 1/2 microgram of lead, according to Rosen's office.

Laboratory tests revealed that certain lots of Iovate's Cold MD product contained significantly more than one-half microgram of lead in a single dose. Iovate stopped selling Cold MD in 2008, Rosen's office said.

The Iovate companies did not admit fault or liability, but have agreed to abide by court orders to prevent any future unfair, dangerous or deceptive business practices, Rosen's office said.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Stephan
a resident of Rex Manor
on Jan 6, 2012 at 9:02 pm

My tax dollars are truly at work here. Finally the government, in a consumer-protection capacity, really is protecting us from dangerous drugs! One has to wonder whether this is an anomaly, or a salutary step in a positive direction: promoting the general welfare.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Freebirds Palo Alto shutters, Pieology to move in
By Elena Kadvany | 12 comments | 3,257 views

A Glimpse into local HS Suicide
By Chandrama Anderson | 8 comments | 2,287 views

Deny the 429 Univ Ave Project Appeal
By Steve Levy | 7 comments | 1,410 views

Now Playing - Your Dinner!
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 950 views

Teens and Cutting, What's Going On?
By Caroline Fleck | 0 comments | 216 views