After a contentious vote, overshadowed by accusations of procedural lapses and questionable tactics, service workers at El Camino Hospital turned down a proposal to decertify their union, a hospital official confirmed.
The outcome of the vote was cheered by those who feel the SEIU provides an invaluable service for hospital workers and bemoaned by those who say the union does little except collect dues.
Kary Lynch, a union steward, voted against the decertification of the SEIU, which he said has consistently worked in the interest of its members. Lynch said he was very pleased when he learned that the decertification effort had been rejected by what he viewed as a very healthy margin of 242 votes.
"We're pretty excited about that," Lynch said. "We're hoping that this vote sends a strong message to management that the members (of the SEIU at El Camino) are united."
Lynch has maintained all along that the decertification effort has been quietly, yet aggressively, supported and pushed by hospital management, whom he said would love nothing more than to see the dissolution of the SEIU at El Camino.
It is a ludicrous charge, according to Paul Williams, who helped organize the initial petition needed before a decertification vote could be held. The petition was signed by more than 500 SEIU members -- well over the 30 percent required to hold a vote on the issue.
"The union pushed hard to make it an employee-versus-the-management election," Williams said. "That wasn't the reason for this election. This election was to bring the choice back to the workers."
Williams maintained that the whole decertification effort came from disenfranchised SEIU members at El Camino.
For its part, the hospital denies taking sides. Charlene Gliniecki, chief of people officer for El Camino, said that anyone who thought the hospital was taking sides would be "hard pressed to prove that anything like that had happened at all."
Resentment over dues
Williams said he and many others at the hospital have resented being forced to pay dues to the SEIU -- a union which represents about 1,200 El Camino employees, from janitors to dieticians. In exchange for the dues he pays, Williams said he rarely, if ever, has seen any meaningful action or help coming from the SEIU.
What he has seen, he said, is a union that continually and publicly vilifies the hospital administration.
Williams said that the SEIU has created a "divisive" atmosphere at the hospital -- seeking to inspire an "us versus them" attitude at every turn. The union aims to keep its members fearful of the hospital administration, so they will remain loyal and pay their dues on time, he told the Voice in October 2011 about the successful decertification petition.
To back up his claim, Williams pointed to a flyer that was circulating at the time, which featured this quote from Lynch: "Management will do just about anything to get rid of our union, because they know it's the only thing that stands between them and the cuts they want to make to our benefits and wages."
"That's intimidation if I've ever seen it," Williams said.
It took more than two months from the time the petition was submitted in October 2011 until the vote was held on Jan. 5. The ballot was delayed for a time by a legal action, brought by the SEIU, which claimed Williams and others had not followed protocol when collecting signatures.
During that time, Williams said, the anti-SEIU contingent lost momentum and the union "machine" was able to rally members.
The SEIU gained steam, he said, by dispatching union staffers from outside the hospital to talk to El Camino employees in break rooms and in the hallways about why they ought to vote no on decertification. According to Williams, the SEIU even sent its people to members' homes.
"We don't have time to go beat the bushes," Williams said. "We have lives to save. We don't have time to be as organized."
Ballots were finally cast on Jan. 5, but the outcome of the months-long battle was delayed nearly another week, after the state administrator overseeing the collection of votes at El Camino's Los Gatos campus admitted that he had not checked each voter for identification.
Some demanded an investigation to ensure that no fraud had taken place, while others accused the hospital of conducting an investigation simply to delay the outcome.
"This is probably the most contentious that I've seen it," Lynch said, commenting on the state of relations among his own union members and with hospital administration.
While Williams said he thinks the hospital administration would treat those workers currently represented by the SEIU fairly with or without the the union, Lynch begs to differ.
He pointed to the 195 pink slips that were handed out to hospital employees, including hospital administrators, nurses and SEIU members, in August 2010. The hospital initially said that 140 of those 195 employees put on notice would be laid off within 60 days. However, Lynch observed, all SEIU members who received a layoff notice were able to remain working for El Camino. He credited his union's bargaining unit for that outcome.
This story contains 957 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.