News

EPA finds high levels of toxic vapors in NASA building

A building occupied by facilities workers at NASA Ames Research Center has 10 times the limit of toxic vapors coming from an underground plume, according to recent tests by the Environmental Protection Agency.

"Short-term exposure at that level, particularly for pregnant women, would be an issue," said Lenny Siegel, director of the Center for Public Environmental Oversight. "Birth defects are caused by short-term exposure."

The reading was taken over a large toxic plume flowing under northeastern Mountain View and Moffett Field. Fairchild, Intel and the United States Navy were among those who used the industrial solvent Trichloroethylene and either dumped it on the ground or leaked it from storage tanks over the years.

Known as Building 10, the former Navy structure appears to have been built in the 1930s and houses a massive boiler used to heat nearby buildings and a locker room for workers.

"According to NASA, approximately 20 people occupy the building for short periods of time during each workday," said Navy BRAC environmental coordinator Scott Anderson in an email.

While the plume has been undergoing cleanup for more than a decade, tests have only recently begun of the air inside some of Moffett's buildings. Siegel said the delay was caused by a dispute between the Navy and NASA over which was responsible. The Navy left Moffett Field to NASA in 1994.

The source of the vapors is an underground steam tunnel connecting to Moffett's massive Hangar One. The EPA is pushing to have something done about tunnel, "which is serving as a conduit to this building," EPA project manager Alana Lee said. Inside the tunnel "we saw elevated levels of TCE greater than 1,000 micrograms per cubic meter," Lee told the Moffett Field Advisory Board.

After the EPA found the contaminated air, a temporary ventilation system was installed in Building 10 and the Navy is set to conduct follow-up measurements of the air inside. The Navy will also test 21 other buildings nearby.

"The Navy is working with NASA as well as EPA to find out about mitigating this building," Lee said of Building 10. "NASA does plan on using this building."

Andersen conformed that a plan is in the works.

"The Navy is currently conducting engineering evaluations of Building 10 and the associated subsurface utility corridor to determine the appropriate mitigation measures," Anderson said. "The design of any system will be reviewed and approved by the EPA."

Elevated TCE levels have also been found inside the Moffett Field museum (Building 126), a portion of which was at 23 micrograms per cubic meter during the last published test in 2009.

TCE vapors were found inside Building 10 at 50 micrograms per cubic meter. To put the measurement in perspective, the EPA has recommended a limit of 15 micrograms per cubic meter for short-term exposure to workers at a nearby Google campus construction site, Siegel said. Five micrograms per cubic meter is the EPA limit for long-term exposures in the area's commercial buildings.

Siegel said that the long-term limit for commercial buildings would be only 2 micrograms per cubic meter if new information were implemented from a toxicological assessment of TCE released by the EPA last year. The assessment found TCE "carcinogenic to humans by all routes of exposure" and says that inhalation can cause "hepatic, renal, neurological, immunological, reproductive and developmental effects."

Lee confirmed at a recent Moffett Field RAB meeting that there are no plans to change the cleanup requirements at Moffett in light of the latest TCE risk assessment.

"I don't necessarily agree, but the idea is you don't change everything you are doing every time there is a new risk assessment," Siegel said.

Siegel says NASA has raised issues about vapor intrusion from underground tunnels at Moffett for years. Hangar One may also require some unique mitigation if it is eventually restored.

"I've been warning people if we ever get Hangar One re-covered we'll have to test air inside," Siegel said. "It is so big air will be diluted. It will be an interesting study in the movement of VOCs in indoor air because it is such a large space to test. Does it accumulate near the roof, the floor? It is above the plume. I think the groundwater contamination under Hangar One is 100 parts per billion."

To keep track of the latest indoor air test results from the Navy and NASA visit environment.arc.nasa.gov/reports/map.html.

Comments

 +   Like this comment
Posted by rem
a resident of another community
on Jun 1, 2012 at 2:13 pm

rem is a registered user.

That plume has been known about for a LONG TIME.

Why don't we have some honesty from Navy and NASA that THEY want to get rid of certain buildings on Moffett. CAN YOU SAY - HANGER ONE. Plus others that were built in the late thirty. HANGER ONE WAS BUILT IN 1935..

I would like to see a medical report of how many "workman comp" claims and other medical reports that have been filed in the past 75 years. Yes I said 75 years..

Reskinning HANGER ONE IS A JOKE. Next NASA and Navy will say there is to much "rust"....

Let's have some honesty - Navy and NASA !!!!


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

I Told My Mom She's Dying
By Chandrama Anderson | 10 comments | 2,291 views

Grab a Bowl of Heaven soon in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 1,452 views

Quick Check List for UC Applications
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 856 views

Fancy Fast and Fun!
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 819 views

Palo Alto and Bay Area Election Facts and Thoughts on the Implications
By Steve Levy | 2 comments | 303 views