Sign up for Express
New from the Voice, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Mountain View, California Forecast
Voice News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

Council OKs flood basin concept for McKelvey  

Bookmark and Share
Though they took issue with several design details, City Council members approved a conceptual plan Tuesday for turning McKelvey Park into a 15-foot-deep flood basin, including new baseball fields and a playground paid for by the Santa Clara Valley Water District.

The council voted 4-1 to approve the concept with members Jac Siegel opposed, Laura Macias abstaining and Mike Kasperzak absent for the third week in a row.

Council members and sports leagues were largely supportive of the idea, saying it was an opportunity to upgrade the park at no cost to the city and that lowering the park by 15 feet could actually be aesthetically pleasing. But neighbors said the park's new conceptual design was too oriented towards sports and not enough towards neighborhood needs.

The concept is part of a larger Water District plan to protect 2,250 homes in Mountain View from a "100-year flood" -- when the waters of Permanente and Hale creeks overflow their banks -- and to save homeowners in certain areas from having to buy flood insurance. Three other flood basins have been proposed, including two in the Los Altos area which have yet to be approved and another one, already approved by the council as a concept, in the Cuesta Annex.

A handful of neighbors opposed the use of artificial turf proposed for the new ball fields, which they said would keep them from being able to walk their dogs at the park. And a new playground for the park, which has never had one, was slated for a dangerous location, neighbors said, facing oncoming traffic at the northern tip of the park on Miramonte Avenue at the corner of Park Drive.

Council members agreed, and said the playground should trade places with a portion of the parking lot in the design, which is twice as large as the current one with 72 spaces.

The City Council will likely impose new design requirements on the project in the future to address neighbors' concerns.

Macias was advised to abstain from the council dais because of the proximity of her home to McKelvey Park, but she decided to oppose the project from the public speaker's podium. She said that when voters approved the Clean and Safe Creeks Act of 2000 to fund the project, they did not intend to have such an impact on open spaces. She added that the city does not have the space for what has become known as a "regional" sports facility at McKelvey Park.

In a recent closed meeting, the council considered buying four unfinished homes on Mountain View Avenue to extend the park, but decided against it. On Tuesday, neighbor Gene Lee and others revisited the idea, saying it would allow more room for a neighborhood-oriented portion of the park along Mountain View Avenue.

"Our neighborhood doesn't really have a neighborhood park," Lee said. "We need a neighborhood park. You can today determine that you want those four properties and make the Water District buy it. We're talking a 100-year flood, let's take an extra year and do it right."

Siegel agreed that it was a good idea, but said the Water District had not been "active in trying to say, 'We can put this into the plan.' I really wished that could be part of the park."

Representatives of local youth sports leagues were largely supportive of the conceptual project, including the proposed artificial turf, which would allow them to use it year-round. The park's fields currently are closed in the winter months.

The conceptual plan includes a long list of improvements for the two baseball fields, including new snack shacks with garbage disposals in the sinks, batting cages, bleachers, even WiFi throughout the facility.

Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.


Comments

Posted by sanyacada, a resident of the Blossom Valley neighborhood, on Mar 10, 2010 at 10:03 pm

check out Web Link for home and flood insurance with full coverage for your home


Posted by patrick, a resident of the Shoreline West neighborhood, on Mar 15, 2010 at 8:58 am

Could someone explain what protection ( really ) this catch basin would provide in a '100 year flood' ? Has the Santa Clara Valley Water District provided the details of the engineering study of the project and its' effectiveness or is this another way for them to spend the excessive amount of money they receive?

The improvements seem to be directed more towards the parents than for the kids playing baseball, i.e., "...including new snack shacks with garbage disposals in the sinks, batting cages, bleachers, even WiFi throughout the facility."


Posted by Afshin Rouhani, a resident of another community, on Mar 15, 2010 at 10:25 am

Patrick -

For more details on the project, including the engineering study (called the Planning Study Report, in this case), you could go to:

Web Link

and download/review the engineering basis of the proposed project.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

mv-voice.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.