|
|
|
Uploaded: Monday, March 22, 2010, 10:54 AM
EDITORIAL: Schools should get a bigger slice of 'Shoreline Community' funds
|
Back in 1969, when the state Legislature created a special tax district in Mountain View called the "Regional Shoreline Park Community," no one could have guessed that one day a company called Google would set up shop there and begin reaping billions in yearly profits.
Similarly, no one knew that the value of Shoreline properties would jump from $200 million to more than $3 billion, and pour some $26 million a year in property taxes back into this strategic tax district — in part by diverting that money away from local schools.
The stated purpose of the Shoreline district is to use property taxes to pay for maintenance of Shoreline Park and for improvements in the surrounding industrial neighborhood, an arrangement similar to that of many special districts around the state. And it has worked beyond anyone's expectations, with diverted taxes going to such gems as the Stevens Creek Trail and Shoreline Park, as well as freeway overpasses, fire services and much more.
And there's more to come: In the next few years, the city expects to back $31 million in bonds to build a hotel near the Googleplex, paying them off with funds from the Shoreline tax district.
Over the years, the city has shared a small part of this revenue with local schools, but recently Craig Goldman, chief financial officer of the Mountain View Whisman School District, said he believes it is time for local schools to recoup a larger share. He told the Voice that his district has not been getting the full benefit of taxes paid by high-tech companies in the Shoreline area, a loss he estimates to be more than $5.8 million this year alone. (Another $4.3 million would go to the Mountain View-Los Altos High School District if the special tax district were not in place.)
Not surprisingly, city officials defend the Shoreline Community district, noting that its funds pay for important maintenance at Shoreline Park and the industrial area, which has surely been a factor in attracting so many high-flying companies. City finance director Patty Kong said she doubts the region, a former landfill, would be generating such stellar income in the first place without the tax district's help, and she's surely right.
Meanwhile, city manager Kevin Duggan notes that the city already helps out the school district by maintaining sports fields and other benefits, in addition to funneling $450,000 a year to each district for use in technology-related programs.
At the end of the day, however, the lion's share of Shoreline tax revenue has been going, and will continue to go, to a list of items benefiting the very companies which pay those taxes — and local schools, unfortunately, are not on that list.
It makes sense that city leaders would worry about this money, which has been an important component — arguably the most important component — to Mountain View's financial success. And we join the administrators of Mountain View Whisman in not wanting to upset a city budget so painstakingly balanced by Duggan and his colleagues.
However, one can't ignore the fact that local schools are themselves an important part of the future success of companies like Google, especially if the company is serious, as it claims, about moving more of its employees close to the Googleplex. Many of those high-tech workers are young today, but soon they will be starting families — and looking around for the best schools for their children.
With this is mind, and with Shoreline property taxes at record levels, is it fair — or good long-term planning — to divert so much money away from local schools?
Because this tax district was created through state legislation, there may be technical hurdles to changing its makeup. We believe the city and local school districts, in concert with state Rep. Paul Fong, should begin to investigate what possibilities exist in making the Shoreline district more equitable for all concerned — not just the schools but the city and Shoreline companies as well.
In the meantime, it seems logical that the city would voluntarily begin sharing more of the Shoreline revenue with local school districts, if only to help them out in a time of crisis. Doing so would be for the betterment of all of Mountain View.Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.
|
|
| Comments
|
Posted by James, a resident of the Whisman Station neighborhood, on Mar 22, 2010 at 12:07 pm Hear hear, and don't forget Microsoft Silicon Valley is there too, who's founder thru the Gates Foundation is committed to improving education.
|
|
Posted by Laura Blakely, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Mar 22, 2010 at 2:23 pm Very well put, Voice Editors! Our whole community needs to work together to find creative solutions to keep our schools funded and educate the next generation.
Laura Blakely
President, Mountain View Educational Foundation
|
|
Posted by DSoldIt, a resident of the Shoreline West neighborhood, on Mar 22, 2010 at 2:29 pm Well put. I can imagine that Google private schools will take the money in the future so that the public schools will be left out. I would not like to see this. Schools have been the determining factor of home values staying strong in certain areas during this financial downturn. Mountain View doing all it can to help its schools would not harm anyone neither now nor in the future. Palo Alto schools, Los Altos schools, and Sunnyvale's Cherry Chase school all surround Mountain Views East of El Camino Schools which pale in comparison. With Mountain Views founding purpose to be to include everyone, it would be nice to see that we give the resources to those who need it most, not necessarily want it most.
|
|
Posted by Steve Nelson, a resident of the Cuesta Park neighborhood, on Mar 22, 2010 at 3:20 pm This is an interesting development. Sometime in 2008, as I was reading through the city budget appendices, I came across the tax history for Shoreline on pg. 4-18
"Audited 2006-07 $2,147,316,364 $33,888,148 $2,113,428,216"
--------------total assessed -----frozen base -------Tax increment value
The frozen base is stuck at 1969 values. This is what the schools are guaranteed to access. The other $2 billion plus is forever Shoreline's! When I raised this issue as a question in the 2008 council race (see MV Voice Oct 10, 2008 page 1) it was clear no candidate at the time thought it particularly significant [exception may have been Alicia Crank, HR Commission, who was not elected]. In particular "I haven't heard from anyone [from the schools] say they are unhappy about it," said Tom Means. I think he now has!
This will be a community effort to fix over the next 10 years. We should get started now - so that legislative sunset measures will have time to work gradually. "Debate Season is Here" as said the headline in 2008.
|
|
Posted by eric, a resident of another community, on Mar 22, 2010 at 3:31 pm Duggans comment about playing fields is disingenuous. The city gets use of the school sites during non-school hours as parks and playing fields in exchange for paying for the maintenance. The city knows they have a weak hand here and are grasping at straws.
Kong's comment is equally silly. Yes, the Shoreline funds were needed to develop the area, but it is now a mature business park. Who is that development supposed to benefit for the long term- the geese?
Bravo, Craig Goldman and the Voice for their attention to this critical issue!
|
|
Posted by QM, a resident of the North Whisman neighborhood, on Mar 22, 2010 at 6:50 pm "However, one can't ignore the fact that local schools are themselves an important part of the future success of companies like Google, especially if the company is serious, as it claims, about moving more of its employees close to the Googleplex. Many of those high-tech workers are young today, but soon they will be starting families — and looking around for the best schools for their children."
--
Google got Slater Elementary and shut it down to the residents so they can have their own school. That was the solution to that problem. Perhaps they will build a Google only school at Shoreline.
|
|
Posted by James, a resident of the Whisman Station neighborhood, on Mar 24, 2010 at 7:19 am
The national average spending per pupil adjusted for cost of living is about $10K. The cost of living in Mountain View is 164% of the national average, so schools here are funded at 55% of the national average.
|
|
|
| |
|