Sign up for Express
New from the Voice, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Mountain View, California Forecast
Voice News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

Union rallies at Google's doorstep
UNITE HERE seeks labor agreement in anticipation of new hotel

Photo

Bookmark and Share
More than 100 union supporters gathered next to Google's headquarters last Thursday evening to demand that the Internet giant address efforts to organize a union at the company's proposed hotel.

Late last year Google received exclusive rights to negotiate with the city for a planned 200-room hotel with a 30,000-square-foot conference center. As part of the agreement, the city would allow use of nine acres of its "Charleston East" site, while Google would build the hotel and hire an operator.

In anticipation of the deal going through, the local chapter of UNITE HERE, a hotel service workers' union, wants Google to enter negotiations for a "labor peace agreement," and held a rally Thursday to get the company's attention. City manager Kevin Duggan says the union issue is part of ongoing discussions with Google.

At the rally, local activist group Raging Grannies sang "High ho, high ho, we workers need more dough," and union supporters held signs reading "Google + service workers rights = no matches found."

Hotel workers also talked about having to work multiple jobs to make ends meet. According to UNITE HERE, non-union hotel workers in the south bay average $7 to $8 per hour, without health benefits. By contrast, union workers in Local 19 make $11 per hour, with health benefits, and wages are expected to increase this year.

The issue hit close to home for Stanford students Theresa Zhen and PaHua Cha, whose mothers were both hotel housekeepers.

"I can't help but think of my mom," Cha said. The mentality of "'Better them than us' is not going to get anyone anywhere," she said.

Sandy Perry, outreach minister for First Christian Church in San Jose, said situations of such low pay were a shame in Silicon Valley, a place with "all this wealth, and these multi-billion dollar companies."

"We've all heard the buzz about how well Google treats its employees," said Enrique Fernandez, UNITE HERE business manager, in a press release. "We want Google to treat these future dishwashers, housekeepers and banquet servers with as much fairness as computer programmers. We remain hopeful that Google will live up to its reputation."

A Google employee at the rally who wished to remain anonymous said he couldn't imagine Google standing in the way of the union's efforts to organize. He said the hotel was of particular interest to Google employees, many of whom asked Google executives to talk about the project at a recent forum. At the forum it was the second most popular topic, after Microsoft's bid to acquire Yahoo, he said.

But that interest does not seem to extend to service workers, according to UNITE HERE organizer Owen Li. The rally, Li said, "is the result of not getting anywhere with Google when we tried to meet with them."

Union supporters tried to meet with Google in November "but were denied a meeting and eventually escorted off campus by company security," Li said. Google has pushed back scheduled meetings with the union several times, he said.

The Voice sent Google an e-mail containing several questions on the issue, and received this response from Google spokesperson Andrew Pedersen: "We fully support any group's exercise of their First Amendment right to make their views known. We will discuss labor issues when and if we reach agreement with the city of Mountain View to develop any property."

"If they were to guarantee that workers would be able to choose representation without any fear of intimidation, then we would agree not to picket the opening of the hotel or take any other kind of economic action," Li said.

As to the labor agreement the union is demanding, "The primary purpose of the agreement is to allow a fair process for workers to decide whether they want representation while their employer agrees to remain neutral," Li said. "The first contract would happen through a neutral arbitrator which both parties would agree on. I think the neutral arbitrator would look at a variety of factors to determine what a fair contract looks like. They would have the power to tell Google and the union what the contract would be. It would bind the hotel and the union for several years. There would be no labor disputes."

"We're always hopeful they will meet with us," Li added. "Right now we have no idea when."

Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.


Comments

Posted by good luck, a resident of the Shoreline West neighborhood, on Feb 12, 2008 at 2:22 am

Google always gets whatever it wants. I hope it'll be different this time.


Posted by Jim, a resident of the Waverly Park neighborhood, on Feb 12, 2008 at 5:20 pm

If it's on city land, can't we make sure the workers aren't in poverty!?


Posted by Sarah, a resident of the Shoreline West neighborhood, on Feb 13, 2008 at 5:07 pm

The city has put so much of our tax money into this place already, we should make sure the city council doesn't approve development without a commitment from Google to let workers unionize. I mean, c'mon - Google can afford to pay service employees $11 an hour at a 4 star hotel


Posted by Enough!, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Feb 13, 2008 at 8:32 pm

Down with unions! Google can go to the day worker center for cheap labor. The city supports it, so Google should go for it.


Posted by Rooting for Google, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Feb 14, 2008 at 12:33 am

Unions have outlived their useful original purpose. They are now little more than extortionist groups. Unions are one of the main reasons for the outsourcing of jobs and the inability of American industries to compete with those of other countries.


Posted by John, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Feb 14, 2008 at 10:14 am

If workers should decide to organize together, they can. Google has neither decided to thwart nor help the organization, which is what I understand "neutrality" to mean. What's the issue?

It appears to me that what the conflict is really about is over Google 'helping' the organization of the union by falling into contract with them and eliminating non-union work. Google has chosen 'neutrailty' - which means neither acting in support nor against the union. Neutrality does not mean Google has to help, or even discuss anything with, union leaders.

I fully support workers organizing. I think it's a smart move to make for the workers. However, I don't see where Google sits at fault in any of this. Everyone here, the union leaders included, are merely acting of their own accord and interest.


Posted by Steven, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Feb 14, 2008 at 4:21 pm

John, you're wrong. A neutrality agreement is exactly what the union is seeking. If Google agreed to "neutrality," there'd be no problem. The problem is that they're using typical corporate delay tactics and acting in bad faith. If Google is really going to stay neutral, why are they refusing to put it in writing? Google would not have to eliminate non-union work or fall into contract with them, they'd only have to let workers choose a union. When workers choose representation, there's always a contract. Sometimes a first contract is through arbitration, sometimes it's through adversarial negotiation.


Posted by pro-union resident!, a resident of the Castro City neighborhood, on Feb 14, 2008 at 4:27 pm

Outsourcing of jobs is because of slave labor and sweatshops in those countries, not because of unions! Outsourcing happened long after the labor movement became weak and conciliatory, and is the result of bad trade deals like NAFTA. If you want to stop outsourcing, vote for Obama, because he'll make sure trade deals don't screw over American workers and corporations that outsource don't get rewarded with tax breaks.

It blows my mind that unions can be called extortionist groups! If you are poor and willing to work for anything, isn't it the employer that's extorting you!?!? Unions help people stand up for their rights, they won us the 8 hour work day, worker's compensation, health and safety regulations etc.


Posted by patty, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Feb 14, 2008 at 4:41 pm

john - the union is only talking about the new hotel, not any other google workers


Posted by Robert, a resident of another community, on Feb 18, 2008 at 1:05 am

I know what it is like to be stonewalled by a big company like Google about respecting the right to organize .I was part of a community delegation that approached a different company, Electronic Arts. We were asking them to sign a code of conduct, promising to obey the laws about neutrality towards unions. We were totally stonewalled. Management would not meet with us and they did not respond to my follow-up phone call either.

I really agree with the comments of the pro-union resident above. If you study the history of unions in our country you will see that without unions workers were practically slaves just like the workers in foreign sweatshops. As for NAFTA, the negative effects on workers and the environment were predicted at the time it was passed. Worker groups and environmentalists gave well-documented, eloquent warnings to politicians before the vote--- but they were ignored.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

mv-voice.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.