Sign up for Express
New from the Voice, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Mountain View, California Forecast
Voice News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

District gives nod to new parcel tax
June measure would up tax by 69 percent, easing impact of state cuts

Bookmark and Share
Facing huge state budget cuts that threaten elementary and middle school programs and small class sizes, the Mountain View Whisman school board voted last week to seek a 69 percent increase in the current parcel tax when it comes up for renewal on the June ballot.

If it passes, the tax would raise $1.7 million a year to fund "essential programs," smaller class sizes and to attract and retain teachers.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's proposed cuts in education, if approved by the Legislature, would hit the district hard, taking away an estimated $3 million.

"Our first priority will be to respond to state budget cuts without them having an impact on essential programs," said Craig Goldman, the district's chief financial officer.

Mountain View residents passed the original parcel tax in 2003, when the district faced similar cuts for school libraries and arts and music programs.

"The parcel tax saved all those programs," said Charles Heath of Tramutola, a consulting firm helping to prepare and pass the measure.

Board members originally hoped the new tax would continue to fund special programs for English language learners and at-risk students in the middle schools, as well as hands-on science programs in the elementary schools, according to Goldman. But with the threat of state budget cuts, the additional revenue will likely be used to fund more fundamental programs.

Parcel tax revenue can only be used for programs listed on the ballot measure, and may not be used to pay administrator's salaries or benefits.

"We fully intend to return to our old vision," Goldman said. "We plan to hold onto as many programs as we can from the old parcel tax."

If renewed, parcel tax rates would jump 69 percent, with the biggest property owners -- with lots of more than 44,000 square feet -- paying more than $1,000 per year per parcel, according to Heath. On the other end of the spectrum, yearly taxes on properties of 8,000 square feet or less would jump from $75 to $127 (see chart).

In addition to higher rates, the new parcel tax would last eight years, up from the previous five-year tax. Residents receiving Supplemental Social Security income would be exempt from the tax.

Heath said the renewal is important because the district receives most of its funds from the state and only receives additional income from its parcel tax; private donations, largely from the Mountain View Educational Foundation; city grants for technology; and outside leases on district property.

The high school district, a basic aid district which is funded mostly by local property taxes, faces smaller losses of around $830,000 if the governor's proposal passes, according to a district official.

A survey of 400 Mountain View residents conducted by Tramutola has determined that 75 percent of local residents will support the tax. Members of the school district community are positive about the measure, said Heath, who says he has run focus groups and talked with the local Chamber of Commerce.

"In our experience working on these measures, when you have cuts of this magnitude, people understand the need for parcel taxes," Heath said.

In reaction to the state budget proposal, both the high school and elementary school boards are planning to send letters of opposition to Sacramento. Also, the Mountain View Whisman board approved a seniority list last week to help determine the order of termination among certified employees. Though administrators said they are not anticipating layoffs, education code requires the district to be prepared with a seniority list.

BY THE NUMBERS:
Following are yearly tax rates for the old and new (not yet approved) parcel taxes, based on lot size:

(Square Footage -- Old Rate -- New Rate)
0-8,000 sq. ft. -- $75 -- $127
8,001-14,000 sq. ft. -- $150 -- $254
14,001-22,000 sq. ft. -- $200 -- $339
22,001-28,000 sq. ft. -- $300 -- $508
28,001-44,000 sq. ft. -- $400 -- $677
More than 44,000 sq. ft. -- $600 -- $1,016

INFORMATION:
The measure would allow for parcel tax proceeds to be used for the following:

* Teacher retention and recruitment
* School libraries
* Lower class sizes
* Music and arts programs
* Outdoor education
* Student leadership classes
* Support for English language learners
* Extracurricular sports programs
* On-site intervention specialists
* Intersession programming during school breaks
* Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) programs

Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.


Comments

Posted by Resident, a resident of the Jackson Park neighborhood, on Feb 15, 2008 at 2:21 pm

So does this mean the teachers will get the 4.5% cola added to their pay like the firefighters in this town will get for the next 5 years? Let's see the district put their money where their mouth is because from my recollection, teacher raises and COLA adjustments have been almost nonexistent since the last tax increase. If you want to retain and recruit good teachers, pay them what they're worth, as have the surrounding school districts with higher performing schools. It's teachers that impact students more than anything else.


Posted by NUMB, a resident of the Monta Loma neighborhood, on Feb 18, 2008 at 6:52 pm

WHAT? AGAIN? Are we all living on the same planet? I cannot believe this.

* Teacher retention and recruitment YEAH RIGHT, DOES THIS ACTUALLY MEAN THE TEACHERS WILL GET PAID MORE. A SIMPLE YES OR NO ANSWER IS ALL THAT'S REQUIRED, BUT YOU'LL NEVER GET IT

* School libraries - Go to the PUBLIC LIBRARY instead

* Lower class sizes - They already are low! FOR PETE'S SAKE I SAT IN CLASSROOMS OF 30 OR MORE MY ENTIRE TIME IN SCHOOL.

* Music and arts programs - FOCUS ON MATH, SCIENCE INSTEAD.

* Outdoor education - WHAT!?! I don't even want to know what this is.

* Student leadership classes WHAT!?! Who came up with this wacko list. THIS IS A ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT.

* Support for English language learners OH PLEASE... HERE WE GO AGAIN FOOTING THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION TAX BILL SINCE NO ONE ELSE WANTS TO PAY FOR IT

* Extracurricular sports programs OH PLEASE

* On-site intervention specialists NOW WHAT? MORE GANGS IN THE SCHOOLS

* Intersession programming during school breaks THIS IS THE LIMIT! WHAT A BUNCH OF HOG WASH

* Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) programs TAKE THE MONEY YOU SAVE FROM PAY MORE TAXES AND GET YOUR KID PIANO LESSONS

RECALL THE BOARD, they've obviously lost their senses/


Posted by Mari, a resident of the Shoreline West neighborhood, on Feb 28, 2008 at 1:06 pm

NUMB, your insensitivity is amazing. Spoken like someone who is no raising kids in the here and now. Since I am raising kids, I can tell you that these programs are absolutely necessary. It can make a difference between having inadequately educated children who roam the streets and get into trouble,growing up to be on public assistance because they were given substandard education and guidance,and children who thrive because they are exposed to a myriad of programs. Good parenting can only go so far. A great education combined with great parenting is what's needed. Our children deserve nothing less than the best we can offer. It's much more than just science and math.


Posted by Enough!, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Feb 28, 2008 at 6:01 pm

Mari:

With Mountain View schools doing so poorly, I think Numb's main concern was to focus on the basics and shelve the rest. We are in a recession. Not all families can afford higher taxes. Schools need to focus on science and math above all else after reading and writing. Yet science and math is nowhere on the list. You won't have to go far to find how dismal the school districts performs in these areas. The state and nation as a whole is doing terrible in these areas. The middle schools can never find qualified science and math teachers. The ones at the middle schools are just rotten (and you'd know if were a scientist).

I say recall the board as well. It's not like over half were even elected anyway. One was appointed, another faced no challengers and just walked in, as was the same for a third seeking a second term. Smart and wealthier families just take their kids out and go to private schools. I say you should do the same if you don't want your kids roaming the streets.


Posted by Robin Iwai, a resident of the Martens-Carmelita neighborhood, on Mar 8, 2008 at 4:05 pm

NUMB and Enough! you have convinced me beyond a doubt that you

1. don't have children in MV public schools

2. have not attended a school board meeting in the last 5 years or so

3. base your observations on rumors, as your accusations are LIGHT YEARS from what's actually happening in our schools.

4. have never set foot inside a school library

We have kids whose first experience camping or going to the mountains is at 5th grade science camp

There is a huge amount of research that shows a link between music studies and achievement in math

Please find another ax to grind.


Posted by Teacher, a resident of the Sylvan Park neighborhood, on Mar 10, 2008 at 8:36 pm

Robin:

We got a 1% bonus for a raise. Technically it's not a raise. It comes to about $300 per teacher this year and next. Doesn't even begin to cover runaway gas prices. The district threatened the union with cutting into our benefits if we didn't accept it.

I suggest you try quoting some more facts on teacher raises since you're so good at towing the party line. Tell us all how teacher raises have kept up with the cost of living and inflation rate for this area. Go ahead. Research the last 5 years. Do your homework and you'll find out our salaries are being whittled away and our purchasing power has declined. Then research administrators salaries for the same period. What? Cat got your tongue?


Posted by Jackson, a resident of the North Whisman neighborhood, on Mar 10, 2008 at 10:04 pm

1. "Numb" and "Enough" are the same person. I have been reading other articles comments and I can assure you it is the same person. He is an idiot!

2. Teacher: Wow! What do salaries have to do with Robin's comment?


Posted by Teacher, a resident of the Sylvan Park neighborhood, on Mar 11, 2008 at 3:59 pm

You're the idiot Jackson.

If you bothered to read the article you would see that the

tax money would supposedly go toward and attracting and retaining teachers.

My point was that the district never follows through with raises.

And your point is?


Posted by Observer, a resident of the Whisman Station neighborhood, on Mar 11, 2008 at 6:22 pm

I say tax Google. Then through out the school administration and higher a private firm to shake up Mountain View schools. Oh wait, that would end the gravy train.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

mv-voice.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.