Sign up for Express
New from the Voice, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Mountain View, California Forecast
Voice News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

Parcel tax present: $166,000
Schools would be devastated without it, say MV Whisman officials

Bookmark and Share
Mountain View Whisman school officials searching for ways to compensate for expected cuts in state funding will get some relief from their own parcel tax, which is showing a surplus of $166,000 in unspent funds this year.

The unused revenue from the tax -- approved by Measure J in 2004 -- is due to the late start of some programs and to price changes for some services and programs, a representative from the parcel tax's oversight committee told board officials at last week's meeting.

"Normally we try to spend all the money, so we can say to the public we spent it as planned," committee member Steve Sherman told the board. Still, he said, "It's hard to be upset about that during the current circumstances."

Sherman added during his presentation that the tax funds went to programs already approved by the committee, and that less than 1 percent of the tax revenue was spent on administrative costs associated with Measure J.

The leftover funds will help the district as it faces a $100,000 shortfall this year and a possible $2.7 million in cuts for the 2008-09 year.

"When you budget, you are making an estimate," said Craig Goldman, the district's chief financial officer. "This is not unusual. In fact, we prefer to be under budget."

Mountain View voters passed Measure J during the last state budget crisis in 2004 to help pay for after-school sports, send fifth graders to science camp and retain small class sizes. Under Measure J, residents paid as little as $75 a year for smaller properties of up to 8,000 square feet, ranging up to $600 a year for properties over 44,000 square feet. The tax is set to expire in June 2009.

Some of the savings from the tax were a result of the district spending less money than planned for teachers on special assignment, "zero elective periods" and English language learner programs. Fourth, fifth and sixth grade class size reductions started later than expected, and the district did not spend more than $100,000 put aside for these programs.

Goldman said he is also investigating why the district did not use the $17,000 allocated to purchase string instruments, but thinks the instruments were purchased with other funds.

"Let the parcel tax raise money for things one no one else wants to," trustee Ellen Wheeler said during the board meeting.

Measure C campaign begins

The report comes after board members agreed to put a new parcel tax measure, Measure C, on the upcoming June ballot.

School officials said that if Measure C is not renewed, local elementary and middle schools would be devastated by budget cuts.

That is why district supporters have already started to campaign for Measure C, which will tax local property owners to raise close to $3 million for teacher retention, school libraries, small classes and music and art programs.

School officials also plan to raise school bus fees and cut back on supply costs, but have not finalized cuts.

"Clearly we need to get cuts under control," Goldman told trustees at last week's board meeting.

Friends of the district are starting to recruit volunteers and seek donations. The group is planning campaign tactics with Tramutola, an Oakland-based consulting firm that worked on the original parcel tax. Meanwhile, volunteers will begin door-to-door voter outreach, mailing and phone calls in April, according to organizers.

Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.


Comments

Posted by Enough!, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Mar 14, 2008 at 9:44 pm

The federal government sends you a rebate just in time for the schools to take it away from you.

Now is not the time for increasing taxes. Everyone needs to tighten their budget. What lessons are we teaching our children?


Posted by Observer, a resident of the North Whisman neighborhood, on Mar 15, 2008 at 6:32 pm

That's easy: don't manage your money and don't save for a rainy day. A district that can't keep track of $166,000?


Posted by Clyde, a resident of the Waverly Park neighborhood, on Mar 16, 2008 at 5:53 pm

VOTE NO ON HIGHER TAXES! ITS EASY TO SPEND OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY.


Posted by Save our Schools!, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Mar 18, 2008 at 5:12 am

Good schools benefit not only our children, but our society as well. Please vote yes on the Parcel Tax.

Thank you!


Posted by SAVE OUR INCOMES, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Mar 19, 2008 at 8:57 pm

WE'RE IN A RECESSION, IF NOT THE BEGINNING OF A DEPRESSION! GET REAL PEOPLE, THINGS ARE GOING TO GET A LOT WORSE EVEN AT GOOGLE!


Posted by LASD Blows It, a resident of another community, on Mar 21, 2008 at 10:51 am

Isn't it amazing that LASD board would vote to open up another school with this financial crisis looming? Isn't it absurd that the well educated, business saavy board members approved of the re-opening in spite of what they knew was coming? Even when they won't have enough students to fully utilize the newly opened school.

With record gas prices, the school board voted to move the lowest income people in LASD the farthest, essentially doubling their commute and making it impossible for them to even bike to school now. So it looks like LASD is going to hit us up with a new parcel tax and LAEF is going to hit us up even harder. Unfortunately for LAEF, we will be spending an additional $200-300/year driving our kids back and forth to their new school and will be reducing our contributions to LAEF by at least that much next year. We will also be petitioning the Santa Clara County Assessor to reduce our property valuation based on us no longer having a neighborhood school.


Posted by Alan, a resident of the Monta Loma neighborhood, on Mar 21, 2008 at 10:56 am

Not a good time to raise taxes. The city already takes too much in taxes.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

mv-voice.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.