Sign up for Express
New from the Voice, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Mountain View, California Forecast
Voice News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

Big war chests discouraged for council candidates  

Bookmark and Share
Candidates in this year's City Council election be warned: Go above the voluntary spending limit of $19,000 and many in Mountain View won't like you for it.

While candidates in cities like Fremont and Milpitas are spending nearly $100,000 to run a city council campaign, Mountain View has averaged far less, and on Tuesday the City Council said it wants to keep it that way. During their meeting, members unanimously rejected proposals to raise the voluntary spending cap as high as $26,000.

Mayor Tom Means, who will run for re-election this fall, said he was elected in 2004 after spending only $5,000, and added he could probably win this time for less than $4,000.

"If I had to raise $30,000 there is no way I would get involved in this," said council member Ronit Bryant, who plans to use her old lawn signs when she runs for re-election in 2010. "It's difficult enough to encourage people to run given the $3 an hour we get paid."

Council member Matt Pear suggested that people not be allowed to be vice mayor or mayor if they go over the limit. Social pressures are currently the biggest deterrent, bolstered by the fact that violators "get written up in the Voice," Pear said. Violators also forfeit more than $2,000 from the city to pay for ballot candidate statements.

"It's just like an arms race to some extent," Means said about uncontrolled spending limits. "When you see people spend more than the salary they will be getting, it makes you wonder what else they are getting."

For those in the past who didn't abide by the limit or who broke their promises, there was some "shunning that went on," said council member Nick Galiotto.

"A reasonably savvy person can do a lot of e-mail marketing," noted member Laura Macias. "That doesn't cause as much paper waste as mailing. I just really like the idea of keeping it small."

Also rejected was a proposal for a 3 to 5 percent annual increase in the voluntary limit to compensate for growing costs of postage, materials and services. One mailing alone can now cost $9,000, Galiotto said, and lawn signs have doubled in cost in recent years.

Means said he was able to buy ads every week in local papers and still stay within budget. And he noted that the Internet provides a free medium for reaching the public, which members aren't taking advantage of.

"I don't think any of us put videos on YouTube," he said.

Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.


Comments

Posted by eric, a resident of another community, on May 17, 2008 at 12:06 am

Anyone on the council who is running for re-election should have recused themself from this discussion! Incumbants have a ludicrous advantage in council elections. If they have any interest in fair elections, they'd offer a lower spending cap for incumbants!


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

mv-voice.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.