|
|
|
Uploaded: Friday, September 21, 2012, 11:42 AM
Advocates seek detailed bike injury data
|
|
by Daniel DeBolt
Mountain View Voice Staff
Photo
 | Council candidates and cycling advocates are calling for the city to release more detail about the 203 bike-related injuries in Mountain View over the last five years.
According to data released by police, a bike-related injury occurs every nine days, on average. But important details are left out, such as whether there were injuries or if a car was involved, though that's presumably often the case in police reports. The Voice has requested additional details on the 215 collisions since Sept. 2007.
"The question is, what's the cause of the injury?" said Mayor Mike Kasperzak. "Is it because somebody rode into the curb and fell? Did they get doored? There isn't a lot of detail to know what the problem is. There is sort of an implication there's a car problem, we don't know."
Despite such questions, "even one injury is too many," Kasperzak said.
Cyclists say city officials could reduce the number of injuries with bright markings at intersections and crosswalks and by slowing traffic by reducing the width of streets such as California Street and Shoreline Boulevard, while adding special buffered bike lanes.
"The bottom line is, I think it's sobering data," Kasperzak said. "It's data we should follow up on and begin to use the data to see how we can make Mountain View an even more bicycle-friendly town."
The Silicon Valley Bike Coalition is working to get the area's cities to keep track of such data. "We have the opinion that most crashes are preventable with good infrastructure design," said Corinne Winter, the coalition's executive director.
Officials in Portland, Oregon have reported that certain types of marking in intersections have had a "significant" effect on driver and cyclist behavior when before and after video footage was studied.
On the Voice's Town Square, readers have called on the city to look to design guidelines like those created by the National Association of City Transportation Planners, shown on its website, nacto.org. Winters pointed to similar guidelines created by the Valley Transportation Authority.
Mountain View resident, cyclist and blogger Janet LaFleur mapped the data provided by police. Injuries were most likely at the intersection of two higher speed roads, though one bucked the trend: Central Expressway at Castro Street and Moffett Boulevard had no injuries reported. LaFleur credited that to "so much bike/ped traffic at that intersection that drivers are more cautious."
LaFleur left out locations where only one injury had occurred, calling them less significant and too numerous. She says she believes people bike to retail areas, explaining the high injury rates on El Camino Real and roads near San Antonio Shopping Center.
"We should be driven by this type of data in terms of how we prioritize the type of bike and pedestrian amenities we want to create," said council candidate Chris Clark. "Regardless of how angry drivers might feel, increasing numbers of folks are choosing to walk and bike. As an innovative city, we need to adapt to that over time."Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.
|
|
| Comments
|
Posted by good, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Sep 21, 2012 at 12:19 pm I'm glad that the city is taking this issue seriously. If injuries are because of road defects (either poor maintenance or poor design), the city should work hard to fix them.
|
|
Posted by b, a resident of the Jackson Park neighborhood, on Sep 21, 2012 at 2:39 pm i wonder what the rate for injuries are for all vehicular accidents. 1 out of 9 might seem high, but if there are 2-3 car accidents per day, i would think more money should also be put towards traffic safety in general.
|
|
Posted by Otto Maddox, a resident of the Monta Loma neighborhood, on Sep 21, 2012 at 2:41 pm Despite such questions, "even one injury is too many," Kasperzak said.
Really? Zero-defect mentalities cause more harm that good.
Some injuries are going to occur no matter how many new laws and bike paths you create.
The only way to garantee you don't get hurt riding a bike is not riding it. Even then the thing could fall over and hurt you. So don't buy one in the first place.
|
|
Posted by good, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Sep 21, 2012 at 3:34 pm When there is a pattern of injuries or fatalities in the same location (like the series of pedestrians being killed on California Street), then the city has a responsibility to study the pattern. If well placed street changes can greatly reduce the number of fatalities and injuries, then the city should get them done.
|
|
Posted by mike, a resident of the Monta Loma neighborhood, on Sep 21, 2012 at 3:49 pm Responces to injuries, in any field, whether by law enforcement or the population in general, tend to make society safer. A good example could be the rules and regulations forced upon the shipping industry after the Titanic sinking. All of the numerous laws subsequently enacted did indeed make ocean travel safer. Yes, the changes were expensive, and yes, tragic accidents still occured, but we cannot adapt any fatalistic views toward safety.
Safety belts, airbags, stronger vehicle structures, and road design all contribute to lower injuies and fatalities in the auto industry. Cycling advocates simply believe that attention to such details as road design and law enforcement can increase safety.
|
|
|
| |
|