Sign up for Express
New from the Voice, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Mountain View, California Forecast
Voice News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

City looks to trim $100 million from Rengstorff Park plan  

Photos

Bookmark and Share
The largest park in the city's most dense neighborhood is now closer to seeing a facelift.

Having passed on a $136 million revamp of Rengstorff Park and its community center in 2011, City Council members took a liking to a modest $32 million proposal on Tuesday.

City staff members came up with the plan themselves, and made use of an architect on the city's staff, Fred Fallah. It expands the footprint of the 22,000 square-foot 1964 community center by 7,000 square feet, adding three multi-purpose rooms, a kitchen, an elevator to the basement's social hall and new bathrooms. The plan would also replace the 1959 aquatics building and pool, and improves the park's pathways and lighting. The general layout of the park is largely unchanged, though parking will expand from 111 to 174 spaces.

In 2011, consultant came up with four plans to significantly change the park and add an entirely new community center, but council members balked at the cost estimate – ranging from $86.7 million to $139.6 million – and number of old trees that would have to be removed, between 84 and 111.

"I think you, the staff, really understood the community a lot better than an outside consultant," said council member Jac Siegel of the plan, which the entire council appeared to support. "I applaud what you have done. I think you really did listen and create a nice plan. I'm really happy with it."

The plan will now be refined and come back for City Council approval later this year, though funding has yet to be identified. A narrow majority of the council also expressed interest in a cost estimate for a modest parking structure at the park. The revamp of the park could happen little by little as funds are available.

Four residents spoke, and some were concerned about new developments in the park "that shrink useable opens space," said resident Paul Donahue.

The city government has been considering the closure of Crisanto Avenue along the park's northern edge to expand the park.

"If grade separation (of the train tracks) does happen, it would be nice to reclaim the street and be able to put in some grass," Donahue said. Council member Ronit Bryant suggested a bike path in place of the street.

Community Center a big focus

"It would be nice to have a building that looks like it was built in 2015 rather than a building built in the 1960s with a 45-year facelift," said council member Mike Kasperzak, noting the current building's "funky" architecture. Council member Ronit Bryant agreed. "It shouldn't be too difficult to make it fit with the child care center and senior center," both of which the city recently built elsewhere in the park.

"Frankly, a lot of the exterior of the building would be the addition and would look very much like a new building," said public works director Mike Fuller.

The cost of the new community center would be $14 to $17 million, while a new building of such size could cost $32 million, city staff members reported. The 2011 proposals put the cost at up to $53 million.

The community center is now reaching 94 percent capacity on Saturdays and 30 percent capacity on Sundays for private rentals, but the city expects an increase in use with the remodel. Assistant community services director Regina Maurantonio noted the rise in popularity of the city's senior center after it was rebuilt recently, with the average number of daily patrons going from 420 to over 600.

"The addition of three new multi-purpose rooms would open up capacity of expanded recreational opportunities such as special-interest classes, summer camps, and meeting space for nonprofit community groups," said a report by the community services department.

Private events such as weddings would see a boost with a catering kitchen built on to the community center's auditorium, expanded from 200 to 256 seats with a new entrance at the rear where a little-used outdoor stage will be removed. City staff said the city's portable stage would suffice for outdoor events. The three new multi-purpose rooms would extend the front of the building towards Rengstorff Avenue, along with some new office space for city staff members and two towers on the front corners of the building.

The parking lot entrance at the community Center would also be moved to align with Stanford Avenue where a new stoplight would be installed.

Mayor John Inks expressed an interest in "trimming costs" even further and asked city staff to look into the added cost of the environmentally friendly LEED Silver rating the city requires for its own buildings.

In response, Siegel said, "I think it is much more critical to make it functional and beautiful than to try to cut a lot of corners and make it cheap. Quality stands out. If you do something good, it stays with us a very long time."

Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.


Comments

Posted by Silly Question on Crisanto Avenue closure, a resident of the St. Francis Acres neighborhood, on Mar 6, 2013 at 11:36 am

Should Crisanto Avenue be closed, wouldn't half the parking spots (and street parking) be inaccessible? Also wouldn't there be an issue for ADA or emergency vehicles access to the aquatics Park? Seems to me that this would require a bit more planning than just deciding to have bike path or more open space.


Posted by @Silly Question, a resident of the Cuernavaca neighborhood, on Mar 6, 2013 at 1:10 pm

Crisanto would only be closed closer to Rengstorff. We still get access to the apartments on Crisanto and access to parking at the park. It would be closed to thru traffic not closed for the entire street.


Posted by Steven Nelson, a resident of the Cuesta Park neighborhood, on Mar 6, 2013 at 2:10 pm

Could a youth-oriented theatre be build in the back (>500 seating) if the school district came up with the $ ? Joint-Powers Authorities can be wonderful things, ref. 2 shared community sports facilities at Crittenden and Graham. CSMA might also be a partner (JPAs can include non-profits). dear MVWSD Bd. members (no e-discussion)


Posted by Konrad Sosnow, a resident of another community, on Mar 6, 2013 at 2:14 pm

My hat is off to the City Council for taking a dollar-wise approach instead of a gold plated solution


Posted by Otto Maddox, a resident of the Monta Loma neighborhood, on Mar 6, 2013 at 2:27 pm

I'm glad they're widdling back on the spending. Good for the city council.

I'm also in favor of closing Crisanto along the park. The solution would be to turn it into a parking lot. This would address some people's concerns about ADA access to the pool and not require other space in the park to be turned into parking.


Posted by Wording, a resident of the Cuernavaca neighborhood, on Mar 6, 2013 at 3:11 pm

How is the City "saving" if nothing was ever formally planned? C'mon Voice! It's still an incremental expense.


Posted by Garrett, a resident of another community, on Mar 6, 2013 at 6:00 pm

Hoping when they start doing up the Community Center they don't run into little surprises that involve fixing up a building that is 50 years old. Other then that good idea, nice theater for students, the community and the users.


Posted by Steve, a resident of the Sylvan Park neighborhood, on Mar 7, 2013 at 3:22 pm

Compared to squandering $136,000,000.00, blowing only $32,000,000.00 is prudent spending? Mountain View doesn't have any thing more important needing funds?


Posted by Susan, a resident of the Castro City neighborhood, on Mar 8, 2013 at 2:41 pm

Please don't close Crisanto! The nightmare that the California/Escuela intersection would become is unthinkable! The number of cars in and out of the apartments that back up to the Park is incredible. Dump all of that down Escuela and it will become a slaughter alley every day.

A few parking spaces aren't worth the traffic jams and danger to pedestrians and residents. Seldom are the parking spaces all used anyway. Only for special events. Do THAT study before blocking off an improtant little street!


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

mv-voice.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.