Sign up for Express
New from the Voice, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Mountain View, California Forecast
Voice News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

School board shuns televised meetings
MVLA trustees again reject proposal by Los Altos council member

Bookmark and Share
As promised, Los Altos City Council member David Casas came to the local high school district Monday to once again pitch his idea for having the school board's meetings televised.

The last time he sprung the idea, during a June 9 joint meeting between the two governing bodies, Casas got a chilly reception from the trustees, who were upset with the manner of his presentation. This time didn't go much better, after trustees agreed there is not enough interest from the board or community to broadcast their meetings.

Los Altos City Council meetings are carried live on public television, and Casas said the Mountain View Los Altos High School District board should also broadcast in order to promote "governance and transparency."

He first brought up the idea earlier this year, and at that time trustees worried that videotaping would distract the board members during meetings. They also said the cost <0x2014> almost $1,000 per meeting <0x2014> was too expensive, especially considering looming budget cuts.

Then on June 9, Casas, who is a high school district parent, surprised and angered both council and school board members when he announced plans for a pilot program -- paid for by his own employer -- to televise 10 of the board's meetings. Casas works as a manager for LifeScan, a subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson.

The "pilot program" idea was disavowed by his fellow council members and rejected by the trustees, who were miffed at the way he presented the idea without warning.

Casas returned to the district board Monday with a new offer: This time, televising the board's meetings would be paid for using Los Altos city funds -- specifically, a portion of $750,000 the city has received from Comcast for city fees. He said he had discussed the issue with council member Ron Packard, who attended the meeting, but not with other council members.

"I know there are pressing expenses," Casas told the trustees during their meeting this week. "There is a way to make this reality."

Throughout his presentation to the board, Casas said other local school districts, such as Franklin-McKinley School District in San Jose, had turned to broadcasting in the hopes of involving more residents in local discussion. But school board president Judy Hannemann turned that example on its head, saying she spoke with Franklin-McKinley district trustees about televised meetings and heard only negative things: Being on camera distracted them and caused them to bicker, she said, making the board less effective.

"It was a board that had gotten along before, and then they didn't."

Several trustees said they were once again turned off by Casas' presentation -- a perception reminiscent of the June 9 meeting, when trustees said they might have considered the idea were it not for the council member's difficult manner and lack of tact.

This week, after trustee Susan Sweeley asked several questions to clarify Casas' proposal, Casas told her, "The way I speak may not be the way you listen."

Ultimately, trustees said they could not accept an offer for Los Altos to pay for the broadcasting without consent from all of the city council members.

"I would not want to spend school money to fix potholes," Superintendent Barry Groves said later to the Voice. He added that the board makes the final decision.

Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.


Comments

Posted by Lisa, a resident of another community, on Jul 1, 2008 at 7:57 am

It seems odd to me that the board would resist televising their meetings. If the expense issue can be overcome, why not? We can't all leave our homes to attend the meetings, but perhaps some can view the meetings on tv. Isn't public involvement and feedback considered to be of value to this board? And the argument that televising the meetings may cause the board members to bicker is simply ridiculous--they are grown-ups, with some amount of self control, aren't they?

Another board to add to the list of those which televise their meetings is Palo Alto, by the way.


Posted by eric, a resident of another community, on Jul 1, 2008 at 3:51 pm

The fact that PA's school district broadcasts their meetings is the strongest endorsement I've heard against ours doing same.

I'm fairly neutral on the subject, but it seems to me that if you dont care enough about the schools to get off your couch, how much should the board care about your opinion?


Posted by rex, a resident of another community, on Jul 4, 2008 at 4:37 pm

it's obvious these people are thinking of themselves and their own insecurities first, and the conveniences of the public second. and with every hollow explanation, they are further embarrassing themselves. you kinda wonder what other issues directly connected to our kids they are also being short-sighted on?


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

mv-voice.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.