Sign up for Express
New from the Voice, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Mountain View, California Forecast
Voice News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

Council reconsiders density housing  

Bookmark and Share
Even if a more pro-growth City Council is elected this November, they might have a hard time building high density housing if the current council changes some existing policies.

On Tuesday, the council reconsidered zoning policies that allow high density housing in the city: R4 and the city's row house guidelines. No decisions were made, but council members expressed serious concerns with R4 housing, which allows buildings of up to five stories.

Lately, only one developer has even been able to obtain permission to build R4 housing -- a condo complex proposed to replace Summerhill Apartments at 291 Evandale Ave. But some council members have expressed objections to such dense housing as R4 allows.

No other city in the county has zoning in place that allows up to 60 homes per acre, said council member Margaret Abe-Koga, who objects to the zone. Tall housing developments are usually done through more time-consuming precise plans, but R4 was designed to be a "floating zone" to expedite higher densities along major streets and near public transit, and away from one-and two-story homes, city staff said.

"R4 was a knee-jerk reaction to 'Let's get everything zoned to the highest density possible,'" said council member Laura Macias, who said 30 units per acre was already high density. "We already do high density and we shouldn't apologize for it, we do a very good job of it."

The council also reconsidered allowing three-story row homes in neighborhoods zoned for two-story homes. Concerns on that subject came to light after proposal of a row home development on the Hetch Hetchy right of way at Whisman Road. The council eventually lowered the heights of the three-story homes proposed there, but the developer was hesitant to go down to two stories.

Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.


Comments

Posted by Fred, a resident of the Monta Loma neighborhood, on Aug 25, 2008 at 2:59 pm

Council member Margaret Abe-Koga, claims no other city in the county has zoning in place that allows up to 60 homes per acre. The City Staff states “higher densities along major streets and near public transit, and away from one-and two-story homes.”

So why did Council member Margaret Abe-Koga and other Council members vote for the high density multistory Toll Brother project at the Mayfield Mall/HP site.

They have not evidence or data that residence will use transit or that high density will result in less traffic. High density households produce about 5 to 9 trips per day. If 10 percent of the residence use transit that means that means there is an additional traffic load increase of 5 to 9 trips by 90 percent of the residence and the 10 percent transit riders will add 3 to 7 trips - reduce by 2 transit trips.

The big spin was that HP was at a convenient transit site and would be convent and used by their employees. To my knowledge there is not data the shows the employees used transit to get to work. Now the spin is that high density housing will use transit.

Council member Abe-Koga and some other cannot be so stupid as to belief that high density housing near transit (or where else will reduce traffic congestion. They are delusional or ignorant of the reality and data that high density continually increases traffic congestion on local streets and the highways (even diamond lanes are now stop and go).


Posted by ET, a resident of the Monta Loma neighborhood, on Aug 27, 2008 at 5:45 pm

All of the planning data suggests that high density should go where it fits and the HP site was identified in the housing plan as a transit center. Staff completed several studies on traffic. As far as 60 ubits per acre, MAK is technically correct but cities do build higher density projects and approve the higher density in a PP. I drive central exp. and san antonio every day during commute hours and it is no more crowded that ECR and Grant road during the same time periods.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

mv-voice.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.