Mountain View Voice

News - June 19, 2009

Council on taxis: Let the market decide

Members receptive to Police Department effort to relinquish oversight of city's taxi service

by Daniel DeBolt

An ordinance created in the 1960s that limits taxi service in Mountain View to two companies may have outlasted its usefulness, City Council members agreed during a discussion Tuesday night.

As the city faces major budget cuts, the Mountain View Police Department has come up with a money-saver: The department wants to stop using its resources to conduct annual taxi cab inspections, as well as criminal background checks and fingerprinting of taxi drivers.

In response, the City Council on Tuesday appeared supportive of using something else to ensure taxi service quality: the free market.

If the council's discussion Tuesday turns into policy, it could mean a larger variety of taxi cabs parked in front of the downtown train station. Current restrictions only allow two taxi companies to pick up customers in Mountain View: Yellow Cab Company Peninsula and Checker Cab of Silicon Valley.

City Attorney Michael Martello said the restriction was a holdover from the days when cities had to promise cab companies a territory or there would be no taxi service.

Though the police department has not received any complaints about a lack of taxi service in the city, dozens of cab companies have applied to do business here over the years. Many spoke Tuesday evening, including one man who said he was using a limo to get around the regulations and was charging less than taxi service in Mountain View. Many taxi services in the phone book regularly turn away customers who call from Mountain View.

The city's taxi ordinance allows only 34 taxis in the city at a time, a restriction which caused council member Jac Siegel to ask why the free market couldn't be trusted to regulate how many taxis were needed. "Good question," said police captain Max Bosel.

"Are there any other businesses we regulate this much?" Siegel asked.

"The most comparable would be massage parlors," Bosel said.

Bosel said that under the current ordinance, taxi drivers who have been arrested for battery, for example, are not be able to work in the city, and others have been turned away for other past crimes. Under the Police Department's recommendation that would no longer be the case. However, Bosel said that cities including Milpitas and Redwood City have not had any problems as a result of such practices.

One cab company owner from southern San Mateo County, where there are few regulations on taxis, said that "what really works is taking care of customers. The bread and butter of our business is repeat customers. I think it takes care of itself."

A potential Mountain View cab operator offered to charge $2.50 a mile for service rather than the $3 currently offered. He also offered a 25 percent discount to seniors. He said he would be willing to pay a $500 franchise fee to work in Mountain View. (Mountain View currently charges a $114 franchise fee, while San Jose, for example, charges $8,500).

Opponents to deregulation included Larry Silva, owner of Checker Cab, and a handful of taxi drivers. Silva said "deregulation" of taxis was dangerous and appears to be "bleeding" to the west side of Silicon Valley. He said he wants the city to keep requiring drug tests of drivers.

Council member Tom Means, a libertarian and economics professor at San Jose State University, asked Silva why he was using such strong language. Silva said that without some rules, taxi drivers may start to engage in fights and bidding wars for customers as they once did at San Jose airport.

"At the end of the day it doesn't make for a good cab industry," he said.

Currently, taxis that park at the Caltrain station appear to have organized a system so there are no fights over who picks up the next customer. But that may change if the city is opened up to almost any cab operator, said council member Mike Kasperzak.

"We don't have that much business as it is," said one Mountain View taxi driver.

Mayor Margaret Abe-Koga and council members Means, Siegel and John Inks supported allowing other cab companies to come into the city.

"Competition — that's the key to customer satisfaction," Inks said.

Although council member Laura Macias was absent, all those present agreed that it didn't make sense to have highly paid sworn police officers doing the various background checks and cab inspections. Abe-Koga said she wanted the city to begin regulating taxis through business license requirements instead, which could include some form of outside inspection of cabs.

E-mail Daniel DeBolt at ddebolt@mv-voice.com

Comments

Posted by AL, a resident of Shoreline West
on Jun 24, 2009 at 8:27 am

Huh. Well that explains why I see so few cabs around town. I would be tempted to use Castro St restaurants much more if I could easily catch a cab. I hate to have to call for one.
The city needs to ask residents what they need - although I for one am not willing to sacrifice personal safety for the sake of free trade.


Posted by 801Church, a resident of Old Mountain View
on Jun 24, 2009 at 11:36 am

I like the idea of competition. My concern is safety. I would think twice, maybe three times, before getting in a cab if there were no background check on the driver.

As a cab passenger you put a lot of trust in the driver. You can only trust that the driver knows the way to your destination. You can only trust that the driver is skilled at avoiding traffic accidents. You can only trust that the driver will take you to your destination and not into some dark place for robbery or worse.

Mountain View should work with cities in the surrounding area to vet the cab drivers. That way the work and the cost of the work would be less expensive to each city that participates.


Posted by Old Ben, a resident of Shoreline West
on Jun 24, 2009 at 12:15 pm

From a purely practical standpoint, what reliable method will be used to check the background of a recent immigrant from Pakistan?



Posted by MV Resident, a resident of North Whisman
on Jun 24, 2009 at 3:27 pm

Since San Jose charges an $8500 fee (!) to taxi companies, MV only charges $114, and at least one company has offered to pay $500, why not have the companies bear the expense for driver background checks?
I think it's a very bad idea to leave taxi cab customers' safety up to the market.


Posted by Jess, a resident of Old Mountain View
on Jun 24, 2009 at 9:21 pm

We absolutely need more competition of cabs. A ride from Castro to the edge of Palo Alto costs nearly $20. A complete rip off.


Posted by Mike Laursen, a resident of Monta Loma
on Jun 24, 2009 at 11:48 pm

I'm sure most taxi drivers are perfectly safe people just trying to make a living. Promoting worry about taxi drivers, and suggesting that some safety check is going to be effective in protecting us from the trumped-up threat, is the perfect scare tactic for taxi companies trying to gain exclusive territorial rights to avoid competition.

Seriously, we Americans have got to stop being so easily scared.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields