Mountain View Voice

News - June 26, 2009

Council rejects new Evandale proposal

Complex would have been turned into affordable housing, but members wanted more facts

by Daniel DeBolt

The City Council unanimously refused to support a project Tuesday that would have renovated the vacant and long-troubled apartment complex at 291 Evandale Ave. to turn it into affordable housing.

While many council members appeared to support the idea behind the project, none had seen a design proposal to judge the quality of the improvements promised by developer KDF Communities. The council's support on Tuesday would have allowed KDF to apply for $12 million in state bonds for the project. Then council members would make a final decision later on whether to allow the project after KDF submitted designs.

"I'm kind of being asked to take things on trust," said council member Ronit Bryant. "We're opening a door for one specific developer who has given us nothing but words."

As it has done with more than 4,000 units throughout the state, KDF Communities would have taken the 64 apartments down to the wood frame, replacing everything from electrical to sheetrock and roofing. The firm says it has developed a positive reputation in San Jose, where it has renovated 2,000 units. Ray Harper, a principal with KDF, said it would cost $60,000 to renovate each unit, double what the firm usually pays. The cost illustrates the state of disrepair at 291 Evandale, described by many as a "slum."

City staffers supported the proposal by KDF Communities, a for-profit firm that specializes in renovating rundown apartment buildings to make them into affordable housing. The staff was concerned, however, about the building being a century old by the time a 55-year agreement to use the buildings expires.

"It was not an easy recommendation to make, let's be frank," said planning director Randy Tsuda, who said it weighed heavily on his decision that the apartments were "clearly blighted right now."

KDF had committed to giving 90 percent of the units to families that make about 60 percent of the area median income, or $63,660 a year for a family of four. The remaining units would go to those who make 50 percent of the area median income, or $53,050 a year for a family of four. Rents would have been from $130 to $479 below market rate.

Harper said KDF is welcomed in most cities, where council members are grateful to have blighted apartments renovated and turned into affordable housing at no cost to the city. But Mountain View council members did not seem happy with KDF despite the firm's efforts to work with neighbors over the last few months, giving them tours of apartments KDF renovated in San Jose.

"I haven't been invited to go on a tour even though I expressed my full interest," Bryant said. "The developer has put no effort into convincing me. Again and again we get told this is your last chance," to move on a project. "I refuse" to believe that.

Originally, the complex's 16 buildings were to be demolished to make way for 144 condos, and last year the city spent $127,000 to relocate 33 low-income households there. Neighbors say crime has gone down dramatically since then, and that the gangsters who had taken over Devonshire Park have left the area.

Because of that, many neighbors want the complex demolished, and on Tuesday they gave the council a petition with 69 signatures opposing any re-use of 291 Evandale.

Council member Mike Kasperzak said fears that the KDF project meant a return to the problems of the past were "unfounded."

Eduardo Cerna, a broker for Marcus and Millichap, said he's been trying to sell the property since 2005. At one time the owner passed on many good offers from the state's top developers, but things changed after the housing market began to sink last year: Now even "second tier" buyers don't want to renovate the buildings, he said. One recently pulled out of a contract to buy the property after learning more about its problems.

A Los Altos-based developer who has been looking into buying the property told the council that it appears his project won't pencil out at the current price. Because of state bonds, KDF was able to enter a contract to buy the property with a higher offer than anyone else.

KDF's project and ongoing management of the property would have had oversight from several state lending agencies. A representative of one such agency, California Communities, told the council that the agency has never received any complaints about KDF projects over the years.

KDF would have had to spend $150,000 to $250,000 to come up with a formal design for the City Council to consider Tuesday night. While there may be a chance the council could approve the project with a detailed design plan, Harper didn't appear willing bet $250,000 on it.

"We believe we were proposing a high quality project," Harper said after the meeting. "We regret not being able to do a project in Mountain View."

City buys church property

Also at Tuesday's council meeting, a church property for sale was a deal too good for the city to pass up.

The council spent $3.5 million on the United Pentecostal Inc. church at 263 Escuela Ave., a .9-acre property which sits across from the Senior Center. The consent calendar item passed with little discussion.

"It's such a strategic location," said council member Jac Siegel in a phone interview Monday. "First of all we need extra parking for the Senior Center. There are a number of other possibilities, one of which is potentially a teen center. We don't know yet, we haven't had that discussion. To pass it up at this point would be a real mistake."

The city will pull the money from its $5 million capital improvement reserve, which would be replaced by a lump sum of lease revenues from the downtown affordable family housing project on Evelyn Avenue, which has yet to be approved.

A lease scheme with the city allows the church to remain for a few years until it finds another, larger building.

E-mail Daniel DeBolt at


Posted by CC, a resident of Monta Loma
on Jun 25, 2009 at 2:56 pm

Establishing a low income family concerntration site in this neighborhood will turn this place into slum. Crime rate will go up, and good people will move out. Property value will goes down. Less tax revanue for the city, but expense for public service (police potral etc) will jump. For people who supported the low income concentration site, they need to think about the unintended long term negative consequence.

KDF's proposal seems to care about low income people. To me, KDF's goal is to make profit, and Mountain View residence will have to suck up the consequences. I am glad that the council rejected the idea.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields