Mountain View Voice

News - September 30, 2011

Group wins approval of co-housing project

by Daniel DeBolt

On Tuesday the City Council unanimously approved a 19-unit "co-housing" project at 445 Calderon Avenue, the culmination of a two-year labor of love by a group of Baby Boomers who want to live together in a communal environment.

The group led by Susan and David Burwen say they are now set to build the first ground-up co-housing community in Silicon Valley. Susan Burwen called it an "environmentally sensitive, village-like community with gardens and paths and a clubhouse for sharing activities." With the architecture completed, "we are all very pleased with the results. The response has been overwhelmingly positive."

The project will be built on a 1.3-acre lot, displacing the 1885 home of Anne Bakotich and an old orchard with 49 trees classified as "heritage trees" by the city. With rear portions removed, the Bakotich house will be moved to the street frontage and converted to a 750-square-foot space for guests and a live-in caregiver. That makes room for a pair of three-story buildings connected by balconies that house the 19 units, common recreation and dining areas, a pool, a rooftop deck and an underground garage with an elevator.

Council members were enthusiastic in their support of the project, even though the group asked for special fee exceptions from the city to offset the costs of restoring the historic home.

"I haven't heard a single negative comment from anyone" about the project, said Council member Ronit Bryant. She said she liked the idea of the old farmhouse becoming part of the streetscape, as it is currently shrouded by trees.

"I knew Anne Bakotich and she would be very pleased that her house is being saved," said Mayor Jac Siegel.

In total, the group said they were facing a bill from the city for $1.2 million in fees. That includes $550,000 in below-market-rate housing fees if 1.9 BMR units are not built. One member of the group said he was "dismayed" by the process of getting the project approved, particularly the delays caused by a costly state-required Environmental Impact Report because the Bakotich house is considered historic by the state, even though it was removed from the city's list of protected historic homes at Bakotich's request.

City Council members supported the possibility of removing the BMR fee as an incentive for historic preservation, but put off their decision on that until it can be explored along with other options for financial relief. A member of the co-housing group said he would not be able to afford the project without some financial relief from the city. The $800,000 cost of restoring the historic home has already increased the cost for each household by $40,000.

Council members raised the possibly of counting the Bakotich house as a BMR unit, instead of requiring the large BMR fee. Council member Jac Siegel said he was concerned about setting a precedent by waiving the BMR fee. "I cannot support anything that will jeopardize the city for lawsuits," from other developers who oppose the city's BMR ordinance. "Ways to mitigate any risk of litigation has been one of the challenges of our discussions," City Attorney Jannie Quinn said.

In an effort to meet the city's parking requirements, Susan Burwen said the group would be spending $2.5 million on the underground garage, but even then they requested an exception to the city's parking requirements of 2.3 spaces per unit. She said the two spaces per unit approved is justified because the group is made up of older folks who don't need so many cars.

Email Daniel DeBolt at ddebolt@mv-voice.com

Comments

Posted by Kate Forrest, a resident of another community
on Sep 30, 2011 at 9:02 am

I'm a member of the Mountain View Cohousing Community. Speaking not only for myself, but for all of us in the group, we have been very pleased by the helpful way the City staff members have worked with us and our architect, Chuck Durrett, to refine the design of our project and get approval. They helped us develop a solution to what seemed at times to be the insoluable problem of dealing with the historic house. Being able to have a caregiver suite there, while having the old farmhouse visible to the whole community, will be a win-win.

For readers who are curious about the Mountain View Cohousing Community, or about cohousing in general, you can visit our website at www.mountainviewcohousing.org. Our next introductory social will be on October 9 (see Calendar page), if you'd like to meet us and think about whether you might want to join our community.


Posted by Jillian Brooks, a resident of another community
on Oct 7, 2011 at 1:02 pm

It's good to see so much thought and foresight going into a project. Getting the kinks out of the way early on will ensure a smooth project and eventually, a really stellar neighborhood. For all those folks who are young at heart and body, cohousing is a very viable option (and great for kids). Chuck Durrett and Katie McCamant also wrote a new edition of Creating Cohousing: Building Sustainable Communities that just came out this year. They're the foremost designers of cohousing in the United States.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields