Mountain View Voice

News - November 18, 2011

Council OKs funds for affordable housing projects

by Daniel DeBolt

The largest addition to the city's affordable housing stock in recent memory got its start on Tuesday after City Council members set aside $10 million in funding for three projects.

Council members voted 6-1 in support of funding the three projects totaling 85 units on Chiquita Avenue, El Camino Real and Rengstorff Avenue, despite worries from neighbors about parking, traffic and the perception that their property values would go down as a result.

"I'm a neighborhood preservationist, I do care about you and your neighborhood," Mayor Jac Siegel said to neighbors. "That said, you need to look at facts and not anecdotal data."

The council will vote on the projects' designs later.

Proposals included a Habitat for Humanity proposal for eight ownership homes for "very low- and low-income families" at 300 Chiquita Ave., where several households would have to be evicted to make way. The council allocated $2.8 million for it.

At 1581-1585 El Camino Real, First Community Housing proposes 25 apartments for developmentally disabled individuals with "low and extremely low incomes," replacing an apartment building and a commercial building. The city's price tag for it was $2.13 million.

The largest project would put 52 efficiency studios for "extremely low-income" people above 2,700 square feet of new retail at the corner of Rengstorff Avenue and Old Middlefield Way, replacing the 1948 building where the well-known La Costena eatery is located, and an adjacent duplex. The developer is ROEM Apartment Communities and Eden Housing.

Council member Inks was opposed to the final deal, which allocated only a third of the $8.67 million in recommended funding to the ROEM/Eden proposal until its design is found to be satisfactory.

If the design of the three projects are approved, the projects would receive most of the below market rate funds the city has received in recent years from fees on new housing projects.

"We have all this money and it is so difficult to spend it," said council member John Inks, who opposes the practice of charging developers for affordable housing.

The city had requested proposals from affordable housing developers, who ended up not having to compete for the funding because only three viable proposals were made. The three proposals were set to use $15 million of the $18.8 million available.

Email Daniel DeBolt at ddebolt@mv-voice.com

Comments

Posted by downtown neighbor, a resident of Old Mountain View
on Nov 22, 2011 at 8:20 am

The city council says residents making less than 60% of the median income, which is about 20% of us, 'need' government run housing. The money to eventually take over this fifth of our housing stock is collected by making all housing more expensive - that's right, the city makes housing more expensive so they can 'claim' they are making it cheaper!

Housing is expensive because supply is not meeting demand. Naturally developers would want to build more housing to make money by meeting demand, BUT the city says NO - they say: if you want to build housing you need to give us lots of money in housing development taxes. A few developers pay the tax, but most build office or commercial space instead.

So today, even though there are vacant office buildings everywhere, developers build more offices, while the city council hands over tens (soon hundreds) of millions of dollars to their 'cozy' out-of-town developer.

The system is messed up. Some of us have spoken up, but more need to.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields