Mountain View Voice

Opinion - January 25, 2013

A good start toward safer streets

The City Council moved last week to trim down a handful of its oversized streets to make safer lanes and sidewalks for cyclists and pedestrians. It was a good first step after a vigorous discussion that reached an outcome that did not satisfy everyone, but one we hope will be a blueprint for moving ahead.

The city already has an enviable network of bike and pedestrian paths, including dedicated trails that snake out into the Baylands or head through town across El Camino Real toward the Los Altos border. But when pedestrians and cyclists are walking or riding next to a busy four-lane boulevard, or even on a two-lane street, friction can quickly develop between motor vehicles that go whizzing by at 35 or even 45 miles per hour.

Advocates for pedestrians and cyclists pressured the City Council to put some of the wide streets on a "road diet," by, in some cases, reducing the number of lanes from four to two and providing more bike lanes, left-turn lanes on California Street and installing protection for pedestrians. By doing so, the city hopes to entice more people out of their cars to walk or bike to work or where ever they want to go.

Before jumping to any conclusions, the city launched what it called "Operation T.R.A.F.F.I.C.," to research locations that are most dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists. The acronym stands for Together Raising Awareness for Fewer Injuries and Collisions. The search led to some startling findings. Police found 357 collisions since September of 2007, 244 involving bicyclists and 113 involving pedestrians, resulting in injuries ranging from minor cuts and bruises to death. On average, police logged one accident involving pedestrians or bikes every five days and seven pedestrians died after encountering a motor vehicle.

It is difficult to argue with such painful statistics. Clearly the city has a problem when bikes and pedestrians interact with motor vehicles. Although more than half of the accidents logged involved bicyclists, it is also sad and surprising to see more than 100 pedestrians were hit and that seven of them died.

In our view it is simply not acceptable for this carnage to continue. Whether our spacious four-lane boulevards like California Street have to go and be replaced with two lanes and left turn lanes, or speed limits must be drastically reduced, the city must come to grips with this serious problem. Wide boulevards often give drivers the feeling that they can push the speed limit and simply change lanes if there is trouble ahead. Now it is clear that the overwhelming need is to reduce speeds, not make it comfortable to zip through residential neighborhoods like California Street at 40 or more miles per hour. Most vehicles weigh far more than one ton and when they are moving rapidly toward a pedestrian or cyclist there is rarely time to get out of the way. The result can be a serious or fatal accident.

Left turn lanes also were discussed by the council last week, as well as the potential impact on access to businesses that now are located on a wide streets.

After former City Council member Matt Pear, whose family owns the Target property on Showers Drive, told the council he feared businesses would leave if the streets were narrowed, the city's senior traffic engineer Sayed Fakhry disagreed.

He said traffic counts on Showers Drive show that fewer than 12,000 vehicles a day use the street, making one lane in each direction adequate. And, he said, four-lane streets like California could have better traffic flow with just two lanes.

"Say you have two lanes in each direction and the faster lane has a lot of left turns — that creates a lot of unsafe situations," as cars stop in the middle of fast-moving traffic to turn," he said.

These and other common sense changes to our streets can and should be implemented, but not before careful study to make sure better safety is the outcome. Pedestrians and cyclists should not have to risk their life to walk or bike across town.

Comments

Posted by Janet Lafleur, a resident of Rex Manor
on Jan 25, 2013 at 12:42 pm

Thank you, MV Voice, for supporting the efforts to make Mountain View more pleasant and safe for people on foot and on bikes.

It's not 1970 anymore. Our population has grown tremendously and will continue to grow. We cannot afford to have every daily trip by every person be in a car. We need better walking and biking routes and districts so people can shop, eat, socialize with friends and be entertained without creating more traffic. People avoid walking or biking along roads where cars are going 35+ mph; they want slower moving cars and wider sidewalks.

Matt Pear, I don't understand why you think fast moving traffic is critical for retail. It's well documented that slowing traffic and creating walking districts increases dollars spent.

Look at Castro Street, where the city did a "road diet" 20 years ago, before the term even existed. What was a sleepy strip of shops is now bustling with customers day and night. Yes, some businesses left Castro Street, but they were replaced by ones whose profits were great enough to pay the higher rents of a more desirable retail location. As a property owner, why would you not want that?


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields