Mountain View Voice

Opinion - May 23, 2014

Caltrain, bikes and 21st century choices

by Janet Lafleur

All it takes is a trip downtown at 6 p.m. on a weeknight to see the changes.

Bikes overflow the racks on Castro Street and are locked to every available tree and post. Crowds of people cross Central Expressway on foot and on bikes with each signal cycle. The Caltrain platform teems with riders pushing their way onto trains that are standing room-only by the time they reach Palo Alto.

This is not just casual observation either. Caltrain recently released the results of its passenger counts and triennial customer survey: ridership is at an all-time high with a 54 percent increase since 2010; ridership growth continues to strain capacity in peak periods; and all but one station saw growth. Caltrain sees this growth as a sign of continued economic recovery, as anyone who fights workday traffic on Highway 101 can attest.

Much of Caltrain's growth comes from bikes. The number of people bringing bikes aboard has grown a whopping 121 percent since 2010, more than double the overall ridership growth rate. While the growth is partly due to Caltrain adding a second bike car to every train in 2011, bike-aboard ridership has continued to increase, up 19.6 percent last year. This year bike-aboard riders make up over 11 percent of all riders, making Caltrain the nation's leader in bikes-on-transit. And yet, despite a capacity of 80 bikes on most trains, people with bikes are still regularly denied boarding due to overcrowding, primarily in Peninsula cities from Millbrae to Mountain View. That's how popular the service is.

What's more, how people arrive and depart stations is rapidly changing. While walking to reach stations has increased modestly by 7 percent since 2010, taking transit (VTA, BART, Muni or shuttles) is flat at 4 to 7 percent. The most dramatic changes are that driving to and parking at stations has dropped by 24 percent and bicycling to the station is up 30 percent. And that's just the last three years.

So what does this mean? It means that some commonly-held assumptions that we're too suburban to rely on walking, biking and transit, and that people won't shift from solo driving, are wrong. People already are. In fact, 40 percent of Caltrain riders report they are car-free and that doesn't include "car-lite" riders like me who own a car they rarely use. Today's transit-dependent riders are not low-income either. The average Caltrain rider makes $117,000 a year. Most riders are making a conscious choice to not drive that's not simply driven by economics. It's driven by a desire to escape wasting time driving in traffic.

For Caltrain, it means recognizing that for many riders, bikes are the most convenient first and last mile solution, faster than shuttles for trips up to 3 miles when there's congestion, and cheaper than car parking at stations, both for the rider and for Caltrain. It means ensuring that bike capacity of new electrified trains is at least 10 percent of total capacity. It means expanding bike share into office areas like North Bayshore and into popular housing areas like the Mission in San Francisco.

For cities, it means not spending money on expensive parking garages that will bring more vehicles into congested areas, and instead improve walking and biking connections to existing and emerging office and housing areas like San Antonio Center and El Camino Real. It means implementing Transportation Demand Management programs (TDMs) like Stanford did, with incentives that go beyond shuttles to include benefits for people who take transit, bike, walk, carpool or drive at off-peak times. And consider charging for parking at office sites. It's hard to compete with free.

Times have changed and people are showing they want options other than driving. How will we invest to support them?

Janet LaFleur is a Mountain View resident who writes a Voice blog about about bicycling.

Comments

Posted by Andrew Boone, a resident of another community
on May 26, 2014 at 7:33 am

Caltrain needs to install high-quality bicycle parking facilities at every station, including rent-by-the-hour BikeLink electronic bike lockers and simply more standard inverted U-racks. Good bicycle parking is extremely cheap compared to other ways of increasing capacity on Caltrain. This is the ultimate "low-hanging fruit"!

Bay Area Bike Share also needs a major expansion centered on Caltrain stations and nearby employment centers. It's just not a practical network with only 20 stations on the entire SF Peninsula.


Posted by Adina, a resident of another community
on May 27, 2014 at 9:25 pm

Strongly agree about the bikeshare. The peninsula bikeshare use was very low in large part because the stations aren't in the places where riders need to go! Caltrain's data says that 17% of people use a bike for the last mile. The bike share kiosks are clustered walking distance around the stations, rather than 1-3 miles away which is what people use bikes for.


Posted by Choo Choo, a resident of Shoreline West
on May 27, 2014 at 9:30 pm

Weren't bikes and trains invented in the 19th century? Backwards we go!


Posted by commuter, a resident of The Crossings
on May 27, 2014 at 11:39 pm

Mountain View bike share is missing most of their potential users by targeting only the "last mile" crowd. There are already lots of shuttles that take people from the train station to major employers. What bike share really needs to target is the "first mile", i.e. helping people get from their homes to the train stations. The city should deploy bike share stations at local shopping plazas (which are already distributed around residential areas), especially the ones that are on existing major bike routes.


Posted by Future, a resident of Cuernavaca
on May 28, 2014 at 6:48 am

Choo Choo, do you still drive one of those internal combustion engines? How retro-cool! My friend likes his steam powered car.


Posted by Choo Choo, a resident of Shoreline West
on May 28, 2014 at 8:32 am

@Future -- So you can put 4 small children on the back of your bike and pedal from Mt.View to Gilroy and back in a day? Wow! You must be Superman!


Posted by Future, a resident of Cuernavaca
on May 28, 2014 at 1:40 pm

Oh Choo choo, that's where the train comes in. There will always be solutions for those who are positive minded and not mired in negativity. Of course, not that anyone here harps only on the negative, but in general. Good luck with your commuting struggles...must really be rough.


Posted by Janet Lafleur, a resident of Rex Manor
on May 28, 2014 at 11:16 pm

Janet Lafleur is a registered user.

@Choo Choo Make fun all you want, but people are choosing Caltrain because it meets their needs better than whatever technology you think is superior. The truth is that people these days want a full range of choices--walk, bike, car, transit--so they can choose the right tool for the job.

That stands in sharp contrast to how we've designed our cities to only accommodate cars, regardless of whether we're only going a mile where a car is overkill or going into a densely populated area where parking is difficult. Cars work best on the open road, where manufacturers feature them, not getting that gallon of milk from a store not far from home or bumper-to-bumper on a morning commute.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields