District administrators and trustees from the board reviewed the proposed bond measure's language at a Feb. 16 meeting. Although trustees could not comment on their intentions prior to the vote — scheduled for the board's March 1 meeting — it appears that the measure, set for the June ballot, has their support.
Trustee Ellen Wheeler called the School Facilities Improvement Plan — which outlines all the potential projects the bond may pay for — "a thrifty measure," and a "worthwhile use of taxpayer money."
The district administration will recommend that the board approve the measure next month, in time to get it on the June ballot, according to Craig Goldman, district superintendent.
Although the country has not yet fully recovered from the recession, Goldman said that the district cannot wait for these facilities improvements any longer.
"Facilities don't know that we're in an economic recession," Goldman said. "They continue to deteriorate, safety codes continue to change and educational issues have changing needs."
He pointed to a Dec. 2011 survey of 400 local voters, which showed the Mountain View community is both able and willing to support the district bond.
"We are very lucky that Silicon Valley, in general, and Mountain View, specifically, is thriving — notwithstanding the economic crisis," Goldman said.
The proposed measure has had one highly vocal critic. Steven Nelson, a Mountain View resident living in Cuesta Park, said that the superintendent "did a very poor job of getting community input, in my opinion."
Nelson is particularly upset that the district is not considering reopening Whisman Elementary School, which has been closed since 2000 and is currently leased to the German International School.
By including more projects to make district buildings more sustainable, he said, the district could easily make up for the money it generates through its leasing of Whisman or Slater Elementary School, which is occupied by a Google child care program.
"The Slater and Whisman area (on either side of Middlefield east of Highway 85) doesn't have access to a neighborhood school and it seems that the reason behind that is that it enables the other neighborhoods that have schools to have additional operational money."
This story contains 445 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.