Town Square

Post a New Topic

MV Whisman ponders district transfers

Original post made on Feb 15, 2008



Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, February 15, 2008, 2:04 PM

Comments (12)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Jackson Park
on Feb 15, 2008 at 2:15 pm

This is so misleading. I just heard from teachers yesterday that the school district plans on cutting back the Dual Immersion program next year at Castro! How can this be if the program is so popular and high performing and the parents are so interested? Come on Voice, try to get the story straight next time. Do you ever talk to teachers (plural) to get their side of the story. I am so sick of the lies and miscommuication from the school district. Can't you just pose a simple question to the school district and get a straight answer? Why all spin all the time!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Casey Weiss
Mountain View Voice Staff Writer
on Feb 15, 2008 at 3:06 pm

The board has just began talking about transfers and has not yet decided what programs will be cut back under the new state budget. Although board members cannot discuss these issues outside the room, they will address the transfers and dual immersion programs in next the next several meetings.

The Voice decided to write more about the parcel tax, since the board just voted on it, but I will be covering the transfers and dual immersion in more detail as board discussions continue.

Look for an article soon in the Voice.

-Casey Weiss
Voice Staff Reporter


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Jackson Park
on Feb 15, 2008 at 3:15 pm

Wow, in all sincerity, this paper has improved if that's the case. Keep up the good work, and try to get the teacher's perspective equally represented. They affect the children the most.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Non-Resident
a resident of another community
on Feb 15, 2008 at 8:54 pm

Resident,

You cannot lazily accept a few words from a teacher or a reporter without using some critical thinking skills to determine its truthfulness. Go ask directors and administrators within the district as a respectful member of the community and put aside the hasty judgments.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Jackson Park
on Feb 15, 2008 at 10:29 pm

Non-Resident:

The teachers I talked to at length said it was the superintendants themselves who made a special trip to the dual immersion school on Wednesday to interrupt their class meetings to put the spin on cutting down the program. I trust the opinions of my daughter's teachers. I actively stay informed when it comes to her education, so keep your opinion of my critical thinking skills to yourself.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Elliott
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Feb 17, 2008 at 9:03 pm

Here we go again dual-immersion, PACT. Why not send these two programs to Palo Alto. Mountain View Whisman School District made a big mistake handing Slater to Google BIG MISTAKE Mr.Superintendant.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by been thru it
a resident of North Whisman
on Feb 18, 2008 at 8:10 pm

Elliot,
Can you please expand on your post?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Elliott
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Feb 19, 2008 at 12:07 pm

Whats there to expand on you get enough pact and dual immersion parents to comment on any topic just watch them go at each other. These programs help no one they created a division.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Enough!
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Feb 19, 2008 at 9:34 pm

Isn't the problem here a board and school administration that only knows how to make short term changes and has no concept of long term plans or leadership. You watch how long the ridiculous Countinous Improvement fad lasts. I'll give it two years, and then all the hype will disappear and they'll throw it out the window just like it appears they plan to do with these programs. Look at cities around us. Their boards are made up of some seriously qualified people with business experience. From what I can tell, our board has mostly been made up of under-employed house wifes with kids in schools. (Yeah, I know that sounds harsh, but get over it.) They run for board and get in long enough to pave the way for their kids and then they're gone. What kind of business could make a profit with that kind of a board. And then there's the superintendent. Google the guy and you'll find he claims to have 25 years experience in leadership, and then you find out it's been almost entirely in public schools at the secondary level. He counts plenty of time as a classroom teacher and assistant principal as well. Talk about padding the resume. Worse however, it that the guy has never even taught elementary school. Google the other superintendants and its the same, one even bailed out from Redwood City schools, a district which nose dived while she was there. Seriously people, maybe I'm going out on a limb here, but do you think any of this chaos in the schools has anything to do with poor leadership. And I'm not looking for a counterattack here from defenders of the realm trolling the posts for hostile comments, just some alternative opinions on how to move forward. Otherwise we won't be able to keep quality programs like Dual Immersion and Pact and all the involved parents with money that are willing to get involved and stay involved.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sam
a resident of Rex Manor
on Feb 19, 2008 at 10:42 pm

Sometimes one needs to take a step back to move forward. I couldn't argree more "enough" but you lost me with your last sentence. You sound like a pact parent. Always pattting yourself's on the back for everything.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Enough!
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Feb 20, 2008 at 11:22 am

Rex:

I'm no Pact or dual immersion parent, but I do recognize that parents in these programs tend to be more involved which is a good thing. If you get rid of programs like these, you get rid of any say so in the district and leave its direction to the bureaucrats. I'd run for board, but my travels for work don't allow it.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Non-Resident
a resident of another community
on Feb 25, 2008 at 7:57 pm

Enough!

You are eerily on-target regarding Continuous Improvement and the superintendent. Continuous Improvement has no pedagogical basis and there is no research showing any direct positive effect on student achievement. It is a retread from popular off-the-shelf books on business. It is not a fad, just a glaring indication of the educational intelligence level of the leadership.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Grab a Bowl of Heaven soon in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 2,959 views

Don't fund the rape culture at my alma mater
By Jessica T | 36 comments | 2,826 views

Quick Check List for UC Applications
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 2,027 views

Palo Alto and Bay Area Election Facts and Thoughts on the Implications
By Steve Levy | 18 comments | 1,553 views

Fancy Fast and Fun!
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 1,194 views