Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Dec 5, 2008
You can buy Segways directly from the Best Buy on Charleston Avenue. They have a really cool looking off-road model on display.
I just wish they were more affordable.
Good job City Council!! You made the right decision.
Casey, who voted against it?
Great. People who are too lazy to walk can overrun kids on our trails.
I think Segways are for people looking for an alternative to the all-mighty automobile. They are not too lazy to walk; they are too smart to drive. Bikes can travel a lot faster than Segways and they have always been allowed on our trails. It is everyone's responsibility to share the road and share the trail.
That's right. Why don't more people realize that driving a car is off the charts lazier than anything else. And stop saying that Segways replace walking. They do not and were never intended to replace walking. They replace DRIVING. Remember that, people, the next time you sit down in your lazy-maker car and drive a mile to the store or your job....
Bikes go waaaay faster and no one bats an eye at them, and the cyclists often have a bad-ass attitude like 'get out of my way'.
If Segways were never intended to replace walking, why allow them on sidewalks?
For the record, I also think the council is making a mistake in not banning bikes on sidewalks. The issue is not that they are unsafe for pedestrians (though they are), it's that riding on the sidewalk is unsafe for bicyclists unless they are moving at pedestrian speeds. Every driveway becomes an intersection, and usually one with poor visibility. And cross-traffic and turning drivers will not be expecting to see bicyclists riding out from sidewalks, often against the flow of traffic.
Certain roads are not safe for bicycles. Everyday I use the sidewalks of Alma Street and San Antonio. The sidewalks on these streets are in fact designated bicycle routes. It would be wrong to enact a complete ban of bicycles on sidewalks.
Just to clarify about bicycles on sidewalks, the city code already bans them from sidewalks and parking structures in the business district, but not on other streets in town.
Refer to MVCO 19.51 and 19.54 in the muni code list, which is online here:
why are skate boards not allowed on the trail? It is my opinion that any non-gas powered vehicle should be allowed. Or in other words vehicles that don't harm the environment.
As a regular trail user and pedestrian downtown, I think we should share the trail with both Segway's and skateboards. The bicyclists often exceed even 25 MPH on trails, so I see no problem with 12 MPH Segway's or skateboards.
Yes... every driveway and sidewalk crossing is an intersection. You are supposed to stop before crossing the sidewalk, so I see no problem allowing bicycles on non-downtown sidewalks as long as they go slow.
One problem with bicycles is when the rider transitions from vehicle to pedestrian at an intersection in order to beat a red light or stop sign. This practice should be illegal as the pedestrian has the right of way but as the vehicle, they must wait their turn.
Problem: 4-way stop, arrive at the intersection at the same time, I have the right of way and all of a sudden the rider dismounts and begins to walk the bicycle across the crosswalk. What the hell? I just go since I had the right of way as we approached the intersection.
The California Vehicle Code defines a pedestrian as the following:
467. (a) A "pedestrian" is a person who is afoot or who is using
any of the following:
(1) A means of conveyance propelled by human power other than a
(2) An electric personal assistive mobility device.
(b) "Pedestrian" includes a person who is operating a
self-propelled wheelchair, motorized tricycle, or motorized
quadricycle and, by reason of physical disability, is otherwise
unable to move about as a pedestrian, as specified in subdivision
What is the difference between a person using a motorized wheel chair and this device? I saw a disabled person at Moffet Field recently that had a wheel chair that raised her up to eye level at 6 feet tall. The device could also move in this upright position. Should it be banned as well?
It appears to me that a Segway would qualify as an "electric personal assistive mobility device."
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Bailey Park
- Blossom Valley
- Castro City
- Cuesta Park
- Jackson Park
- Monta Loma
- North Bayshore
- North Whisman
- Old Mountain View
- Rengstorff Park
- Rex Manor
- Shoreline West
- St. Francis Acres
- Stierlin Estates
- Sylvan Park
- The Crossings
- Waverly Park
- Whisman Station
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Freebirds Palo Alto shutters, Pieology to move in
By Elena Kadvany | 7 comments | 2,626 views
"Itís Not About the Nail"
By Chandrama Anderson | 4 comments | 1,897 views
Deny the 429 Univ Ave Project Appeal
By Steve Levy | 3 comments | 1,002 views
Now Playing - Your Dinner!
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 780 views
Teens and Cutting, What's Going On?
By Caroline Fleck | 0 comments | 103 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Mountain View
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
© 2015 Mountain View Online
All rights reserved.