Town Square

Post a New Topic

TONIGHT: Important discussion on housing

Original post made on Apr 22, 2009

The housing element of the city's General Plan -- "the primary policy document for the development, rehabilitation and preservation of housing" -- will be the main subject of discussion for the Environmental Planning Commission on Wednesday night.

This story contains 238 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (9)

Like this comment
Posted by confused
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Apr 22, 2009 at 3:23 pm

On what planet is this possibly consistent with the county and state's record unemployment numbers?

Like this comment
Posted by palo alto mom
a resident of another community
on Apr 22, 2009 at 4:11 pm

the planet of ABAG...

Like this comment
Posted by Lynn
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Apr 22, 2009 at 4:13 pm

@confused: Planet Sub-Prime, where a record number of empty units is also considered a housing shortage. And only developers care to show up at the EPC meetings anyway. Don't count on the Voice or any other paper trying to call the BS because real estate ads are their only source of substantial revenue that Craigslist hasn't swallowed up.

Like this comment
Posted by oldschgrl
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Apr 23, 2009 at 9:05 am

what about housing for the 'single' person. not everyone wants to
rent an apartment or buy into a 3 bedroom condo. How about 'single, single' family homes/cottages?

Like this comment
Posted by GDM
a resident of Blossom Valley
on Apr 23, 2009 at 10:37 am

If the City were to follow the requests of ABAG we would end up going bankrupt like Vallejo, or at least unable to fill the potholes in our streets like San Jose. What ever happened to the right of a community to determine it's own makeup? Where will the water come from to support all these new homes? What about traffic? We already have plenty of housing in Mountain View.

Like this comment
Posted by Keepin it real
a resident of another community
on Apr 23, 2009 at 2:01 pm

To all the nay-sayers:

Form your own study group or join ABAG as a volunteer. You might learn something other than criticism. ABAG is comprised of local officials who vote up or down on policy positions to recommend, or studies to commission. Don't kill the messenger. The numbers aren't that complicated or controversial for that matter. Also, the EPC is comprised of local residents that volunteer their time as public servants. If you think you are so much smarter, then volunteer your time to make a difference.

Like this comment
Posted by Biff
a resident of Monta Loma
on Apr 23, 2009 at 2:56 pm

Yeah, all you critics need to shut up and volunteer your time to listen to the developers explain how they want you to help make them richer by clogging traffic up even more than it already is. Imagine, trying to stand up for a livable community instead of more dollars in the coffers! You are probably all socialists!

Like this comment
Posted by Keepin it real
a resident of another community
on Apr 23, 2009 at 6:08 pm


Yes, let's eliminate all "evil" developers, and contractors too. Hell, let's get rid of the planning and building departments too. We should just put a moratorium on all new construction. And when we're done, we will have defeated all evil things that are trying to disguise themselves as progress. I'm sure you built your own home, office, store, hospital and school with your own two hands. And because I know you did, I can't possibly call you a hypocrite for using all these developments made by evil developers.

Like this comment
Posted by Peter Henderson
a resident of Monta Loma
on Apr 24, 2009 at 9:42 am

I don't think anyone is saying developers are evil; they just act in their interest like everyone else. But where are the checks and balances that reign them in? Is a moratorium on new construction a bad idea given the rush hour traffic on our main artteries? If you grant that building can't go on forever, then where do you draw the line? And is our political system capable of supporting any calls to limit growth, sprawl, and traffic?

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Lemonade to open in Palo Alto June 24
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 13,314 views

Summer Reading Meets Cooking Class at Local Libraries
By Laura Stec | 4 comments | 4,562 views

Housing for Low Income Residents and Affordable Housing
By Steve Levy | 33 comments | 2,428 views

My Son Turned 20
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 467 views