Post a New Topic
Original post made
on May 12, 2009
According to SJMN front page Friday May 8, the Metropolitan Transit Commission is providing I forget how much to support BART to San Jose based on BART and VTA's maybe-money from future toll roads and fees from solo drivers to use the HOV lanes, and from a federal agency who has repeatedly put the project on its "Not Recommended" list. Earliest completion date 2025. Yet Caltrain, here today, is so broke it can't run the minimum number of trains to make it worthwhile. There's something seriously wrong here.
We use Caltrain all the time to go to San Jose and San Francisco, as it's a great way to avoid driving and not worry about parking or drunk drivers on the road. Elimination of weekend service would eliminate our ridership, for sure.
You've got a trainload full of thirsty commuters and no coffee. Have Starbucks/Pete's/etc bid for the rights to sell coffee/drinks on the trains.
Maybe they should reconsider how cheaply they provide passes to local businesses, which then pass them on to employees. They cost much less than what the general public pays and probably represent a major portion of ridership. Don't cut service, equalize the cost for everyone.
It is good to know that Caltrain will not run on Weekends: I should find an apartment in San Francisco and commute to work as without a car I'd be stuck in Mountain View on weekends.
This is sad. We should really be providing MORE incentives to take public transit and reduce the number of cars on the road, not fewer! I take Caltrain to work whenever I can, even though it takes more time, costs more money, and is more inconvenient than driving. I do it because I care about the environment.
It is already ridiculous how much the caltrain costs. The fare should be at most half the price of gasoline for driving the same distance. This way, nobody would feel financially inclined to drive unless they could put another person in their car. It seems to me that a gasoline tax or similar should be applied to pay the difference.
I say just reduce midday service, is waiting another 30 minutes too much to ask for in the current economic environment?
Cut weekend service ... GREAT IDEA!!! Please start now!! As a matter of fact, I encourage CalTrain to only run during peak commute hours. For example, 6 - 9 am, and 5 - 8 pm, Monday - Friday. With fuel prices high, and the economy low, there is no reason for these large locomotives to run underutilized.
Please don't get me wrong, I commute on Caltrain, and take it to both SFO and SJC. I love the trains when they are full, and dread them running empty. Bus service from station to station, is adequate for the few weekend riders.
CalTrain, please act now. Cut weekend service, and save the money for electrification.
Re: Martin's post above, I see where you are coming from but let's look at the facts --
First, money for Caltrain electrification comes from a different pot than the money to run the service. Electrification is a capital project, and in the transit industry capital dollars can rarely be used to fund operating costs. For the politicians who make the budgets, cutting the ribbon on a costly capital project (like electrification) is 'sexy' but saying they helped keep some trains or buses running is not. So the argument that cutting weekend service would somehow save money for electrification is a red herring.
Second, take a look at the actual ridership figures... I was able to find them here (Web Link) by Googling. The 2009 ridership report shows that average weekday ridership on the system is was about 39,100 boardings per day, while average Saturday ridership was about 10,400 and Sunday ridership was about 7,800. While those weekend figures are considerably lower, if you look at the train-by-train ridership (towards the end of the report) it shows that the average ridership per train is still in the 250 to 450 range (boardings) per train. That's a lot of people to try to squeeze on buses. I think you'll find the cost savings a lot less than you expect -- again, not saving the agency as much as claimed.
Guess what . . .
Both parties have made "taxes" a dirty word but, in fact, taxes are the way our socieity is funded.
We need to support our schools and infrastructure or we will fall way behind all other western nations. We need to raise taxes somewhat.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Bailey Park
- Blossom Valley
- Castro City
- Cuesta Park
- Jackson Park
- Monta Loma
- North Bayshore
- North Whisman
- Old Mountain View
- Rengstorff Park
- Rex Manor
- Shoreline West
- St. Francis Acres
- Stierlin Estates
- Sylvan Park
- The Crossings
- Waverly Park
- Whisman Station
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Draeger’s Los Altos eyes upgrades, expansion
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 2,867 views
Housing is for People
By Steve Levy | 21 comments | 1,843 views
College Visit: Lehigh and Lafayette
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 4 comments | 1,279 views
Is Coffee a Date?
By Laura Stec | 11 comments | 661 views
The Opposite of What You Don't Want
By Caroline Fleck | 0 comments | 354 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Mountain View
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
© 2015 Mountain View Online
All rights reserved.