Town Square

Post a New Topic

TONIGHT: Council could give final approval to 53-home project at former Grant Road farm

Original post made on Jun 30, 2009

After several years of planning — and heated controversy over loss of open space — the City Council is scheduled to give final approval for 53 new homes at the former Grant Road farm during its meeting tonight.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 12:28 PM

Comments (6)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Laura
a resident of another community
on Jun 30, 2009 at 3:13 pm

We need as many green spaces as possible, not more homes or buildings.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Smart Growther
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Jun 30, 2009 at 3:28 pm

1 - We dont need a park in an area already loaded with park space
2 - Mr Packard, be careful what you wish for. Maybe the MV council should return the favor and block all entering and exiting traffic onto covington. I bet the LA residents will like this idea.

why is it OK for them to use covington but not others. Sounds fair to me.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by vfree
a resident of Waverly Park
on Jun 30, 2009 at 3:40 pm

53 single family homes sounds good for the area. Thanks for moving Levin to connect with Covington too.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Dominick
a resident of Waverly Park
on Jun 30, 2009 at 4:02 pm

Los Altos doesnt get it. The Waverly park residents just want to gain access onto Grant road with a right or left turn rather than the present dare devil actions to exit Levin. A quick survey would show that most residents don't turn into Covington.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Patio Bear
a resident of Blossom Valley
on Jul 1, 2009 at 11:08 am

I'm really surprised by the Los Altos opposition to this. Perhaps Mountain View to stop allowing access to it's streets where they join with Los Altos. The Los Altos position is ludicrous.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jane
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Jul 1, 2009 at 2:36 pm

Instead of McMansions, I think the city should have considered high-density and/or low-income housing for the site. It would have made a big dent in the ABAG housing mandate, and if losing the farm was unavoidable, at least it would have been for the benefit of a significantly higher number of people. It would also have been interesting to observe the reaction of those home owners who suddenly discovered that they had bought a house near a working farm - might they have preferred the farm to 3-story apartment/condo complexes with little associated parking?

On the other hand, I haven't heard anybody clamoring for Minton's to go away. Why should only certain Mountain View neighborhoods bear the brunt of the buildup of high-density housing?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Local picks on 2015 Michelin Bib Gourmand list
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 3,429 views

Ode to Brussels Sprout
By Laura Stec | 20 comments | 2,619 views

Go Giants! Next Stop: World Series!
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,943 views