Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Nov 13, 2009
Hugh, you deliberately seek to miss the point. First, all we know is what Ghysels has chosen to let us know. Second, he refuses to say when the affair began. You complete ignore the issue of conflict or interest and ethics. And when you say, "so far, it seems that they are acting honorably," it really cheapens the meaning of the term honorably. There is a conflict of interest, and there is plenty of precedent against it. The inter-, intra- point is minor and off topic, but thanks for the clarification.
Great point on the distinction of inter vs intra. Sloppy writing by the editor.
This is in response to Christine Crosby who wrote about the Cuesta Annex/ Permanente Creek flood control project draft EIR.
You can read the draft EIR here in PDF: Web Link
The draft EIR does identify significant impacts to trees and wildlife. See Section 4, Chapter 13, page 13-1. It also lists mitigation steps.
"Impact: * BIO5Disturbance of
Nesting Migratory Birds and Raptors (p. 5-17)
Where * All project elements, during
construction; Rancho San
Antonio, Blach School, Cuesta Park Annex, and
McKelvey Park flood
detention facilities, Blach
School Outlet Culvert,
Cuesta Park Annex Inlet
and Outlet Culverts, during
Mitigation * BIO5.1Establish Buffer Zones for Nesting Raptors
and Migratory Birds"
The water district's EIR is intended to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The term "significant and unavoidable" is a legal term of art used in CEQA. You get a lot of EIRs if you search Y! or Google for: ceqa "significant and unavoidable" See also one of the many guides put together for CEQA compliance: Web Link My understanding is that the mitigation steps are intended to avoid the impacts. Where a buffer can be set up to avoid disturbing nesting birds, a buffer cannot be set up to avoid traffic.
Also, CEQA only requires a certain notice and comment period. It is the same notice and comment we get for almost all draft EIRs for the various projects going on around us daily. If you don't think CEQA gives enough time, contact Assembly member Paul Fong (he has an office downtown, on Castro) and get him to change the state law to require more notice and longer comment period; just remember that increased notice and comment period applies across the board for all projects that CEQA applies to (note that some things, like a football stadium in LA and the Napa Wine Train have gotten specially written exclusions :-). More info about CEQA: Web Link
CEQA is a procedural statute. It is intended to put information about environmental impacts in a report for the decision makers (water agency board) to make their decision. Public notice and comment is but one component in the approval process for a project. The draft EIR is not the beginning or end of the process. The board, at the hearing, estimated it will not vote on the project until summer 2010. It was also clear that the water agency has been talking with the city for a number of years. I remember Cuesta Annex as a flood control basin being discussed with regard to the general plan update and even before that, at least 2 years ago.
I attended the hearing and posted about it previously to the MV Voice Townhall, if you are interested. Web Link
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Bailey Park
- Blossom Valley
- Castro City
- Cuesta Park
- Jackson Park
- Monta Loma
- North Bayshore
- North Whisman
- Old Mountain View
- Rengstorff Park
- Rex Manor
- Shoreline West
- St. Francis Acres
- Stierlin Estates
- Sylvan Park
- The Crossings
- Waverly Park
- Whisman Station
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Draeger’s Los Altos eyes upgrades, expansion
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 3,078 views
Housing is for People
By Steve Levy | 29 comments | 2,080 views
College Visit: Lehigh and Lafayette
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 4 comments | 1,439 views
Is Coffee a Date?
By Laura Stec | 13 comments | 950 views
The Opposite of What You Don't Want
By Caroline Fleck | 0 comments | 413 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Mountain View
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
© 2015 Mountain View Online
All rights reserved.