Town Square

Post a New Topic

White House: NASA responsible for Hangar One

Original post made on Mar 8, 2010

After months of review, the federal government has concluded that NASA Ames will have to pay for any restoration of historic Hangar One at Moffett Field without the Navy's help. That leaves the hangar with no designated restoration funding even though it faces partial demolition in November.


Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, March 8, 2010, 1:48 PM

Comments (16)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by phm
a resident of The Crossings
on Mar 8, 2010 at 3:24 pm

Maybe economic stimulous money can be found. The reskinning and renovation of Hanger One would create lots of jobs, I think. Who would need to apply for the funds - Mountain View and Sunnyvale, or NASA?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Retired Naval Officer
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Mar 8, 2010 at 4:34 pm

Let's be practical considering the present fiscal contraints. Government whether at the Federal or Local level can ill afford to expend scarce funds for a sentimental cause. I retired in Hanger One after serving a number of years in the old relic. I have always felt it was an eyesore and especially so when up close. I for one, would deem demolition to be the best choice in this matter.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Bob
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Mar 8, 2010 at 5:27 pm

Hey, Google is using Moffett as their private airstrip, let them pay for it. If not, then let's start anti-trust proceedings, heh, heh...


 +   Like this comment
Posted by John the Man
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Mar 8, 2010 at 5:46 pm

What about upkeep costs? Who is going to pick up the tab on the on-going maintenance, upkeep, and repair that it will need? It's $15 million now, what about future costs? Who is going to pick them up?

Forget it. Let the people who feel it is worth saving pay for it. Believe me, a year after it is gone, no one will think, oh gosh.... our lives are appreciably worse because the hanger is no longer here.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by John doe
a resident of Monta Loma
on Mar 8, 2010 at 5:56 pm

Ummm why should society spend money to save this structure when 15 Million will save so many people from starvation and better society... There is no historic signifcance here other thatn it is OLD and it housed Military Aircraft.... Heck no civil rights or society milestones of significance..... I think nostalgic (white folks) have too much time.... GO spen you time and effor and build a homeless shelter or work in a soup kitchen and do some good.... Oh I forgot...these same people protest low cost housing in Downtown MV since it lowers their property value......


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Doug Pearson
a resident of Blossom Valley
on Mar 8, 2010 at 8:43 pm

I am so sorry to see so many responses saying, in effect, let the Hanger be torn down. I would like to see it restored and if it takes a public subscription to pay for the restoration, I'm willing to contribute.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jane Doe
a resident of Castro City
on Mar 8, 2010 at 10:35 pm

1000+ children die a day from starvation due to poverty (some in the USA)... I think public money should go to that instead...but hey we have this nice hanger to look at it.... I feel better about the 1000+ kids dying everyday or the 10000+ kids under the poverty line in the USA and Not enough people donating money to them....

Can't anyone in MV see how insane it is to spend money on Nostalgia when there are SOOO many more important and worthwhile causes to spend time, money and effort on?.... Heck I have seen booths at Art and Wine festivals for Hanger One get more donatoin money then the MV school booths.... That is such as sad comentary on MV residents...


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Catherine
a resident of Willowgate
on Mar 9, 2010 at 11:11 am

All of those who think it is a waste to spend money on historical preservation when so many humans are in need are right.

Why spend money on architects, designers, and art in general? We should have a national building architecture standard which lays out what a house should look like, what a six-story building should look like, etc. Then we can just build every single building we need to this efficient spec. We can even centralize purchasing of building materials through the federal government for maximum efficiency.

I propose we start this in Mountain View. Think of all the time we'd save in design reviews, etc. We'd be a model for the nation.

The French should have torn down the Eiffel Tower when they had the chance.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by John doe
a resident of Blossom Valley
on Mar 9, 2010 at 11:29 am

Eiffle tower generates income and is self supporting.... Hanger one will cost money to restore and maintain since no one will need such a big hanger..... and as for your comment on archtiects and engineers..... you want to honor the same folks who decided to use asbestos on building a cheap hanger?

I agree with eailer posts.... preservationist are surely well fed and upper middle class.... live in poverty, stuggle with keeping a family housed for a while and tell me again that this is a worthwhile cause...... Eliminate this in the MV and become a Model for the nation for that....


 +   Like this comment
Posted by NeHi
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Mar 9, 2010 at 4:39 pm

High density housing, anyone??


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Just Say'in
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Mar 9, 2010 at 5:29 pm

Seems as if this thing has survived many earthquakes and might be useful for sheltering large numbers of people in the event of another one. Why not turn it into a convention center? Or how about a high speed rail terminal?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by jane
a resident of North Whisman
on Mar 9, 2010 at 5:38 pm

To categorize those who appreciate the amazing archtecture as people who are taking money away from starving children makes no sense at all. As with any cause, if you do not research it, you often do not appreciate it. It will take enormous amounts of money to tear off the siding, and that will have to happen. Then much more money to demolish the hangar. Whay not spend the money on restoring the hangar instead of demolishing it? This hangar is an icon of the Bay Area with a rich history.
All people are concerned about starving children...who is NOT? To some of those who have commented about saving the hangar being equal to starving children: please devote your creative energies and hopes and ideas to that good cause without decrying that saving the hangar is a bad cause.
Let the people who think it is worth saving pay for it? Come one, if we use that logic on everything that we don't personally agree with then nothing would get done!
And as for booths at the art and wine festivals getting more money than schools - I have volunteered in many booths at the art and wine festivals - Save Hangar One, MVVP, candidate booths, picked up recycling, and NEVER has there been a booth asking for donations to save hangar one. You are always free to donate to schools, and many people do - I have also participated in phone banks asking for school donations. So do not generalize that wanting to preserve a historical building means that there is an intent to take money from children... does not follow and reports about donating to save hangar one at the Art and WIne are just not true- it was a petition.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by levelItAll
a resident of Blossom Valley
on Mar 11, 2010 at 12:16 am

there are dozens, if not hundreds, of structures on the national registry of historic places in Santa Clara County: Web Link

Hangar One is just outside the Air Station Sunnyvale Historical District (which includes most of the old Spanish style architecture on Moffett Field), I believe. The other on Moffett Field is the Unitary Wind Tunnel, which has historic technical significance due to some of the groundbreaking work done there. However, Hangar One is arguable the most recognizable, enduring symbol of the Bay Area's aviation past. Losing it would literally be losing a significant piece of the area's history. The orchards are gone. The P3s are gone, soon people will think the area began in a small garage in Palo Alto (which, by the way, needs to be demolished as well;) Hard to justify the expense of restoration, but even harder to see the area lose such a great testament to the bold aviation past of the area. The photos of Hangar One with the Macon moored alongside truly add perspective to what will be lost (aka... 'seriously, are those model A's parked on that dirt road? and is that dirt road really 101?!). Maybe not starving kids sad, but sad nonetheless.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Old Ben
a resident of Shoreline West
on Mar 11, 2010 at 1:19 pm

I'm continually amazed at the reasoning of people who dismiss single-payer health care as Stalinism but insist on using public monies for useless military nostalgia. Whatever government entity built it should be responsible for dealing with it.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Brenda
a resident of North Whisman
on Mar 11, 2010 at 3:13 pm

Time to say goodbye to this monstrosity.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Citizen
a resident of another community
on Mar 26, 2011 at 9:20 pm

Notice how everything involving NASA is suddenly getting the shaft? Notice how this all seemed to start around the time a certain someone was elected into office and started making decisions as to the future of NASA? And who's job is it gonna be to remove the skeletal structure after the sea air causes it to corrode and rust at an extreme rate? That's more taxpayer money(OUR MONEY, YOUR MONEY, MY MONEY) to be spent. Millions more. Chances are the cost to completely remove and dispose the remaining structure after the U.S. Government allows it become a real eyesore instead of a REAL monument will outweigh any costs that would have been required to restore it. Especially since once metallic objects have become corroded by sea air they aren't the most salvageable and recyclable parts. Obviously Management and Budget aren't performing proper management or budgeting skills. Than again Obama will be out of office when that part happens so whatever party loses in the next campaign will be blaming our next president for it. But it's okay cause we can't afford to restore a historical monument to our country but Obama can afford to go on vacation to another continent every other month.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Early Decision Blues
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 2,157 views

One night only: ‘Occupy the Farm’ screening in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 1 comment | 2,065 views

Death with Dignity
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,286 views

With a Perspective....
By Ms. Jenson | 0 comments | 450 views

10 Tried and True Ways to Increase Happiness
By Caroline Fleck | 2 comments | 416 views