Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Mar 9, 2010
I don't plan on showing up at the council meeting, but I hope those bozos have enough sense to skip this expenditure. Homeowners in a flood zone can either buy insurance or self insure. If it were me, I might take my chances. However, why should the City dig a huge hole to catch some rainfall? Let it run to the bay and let the Little Leaguers play on their existing fields. Give me a break from this nonsense.
I guess it was obvious to me, but this just seems like the proverbial hole that you just throw money into. Skip it MV.
So, what did the299crew suggest we do with money that's budgeted specifically for floor control?
I think the whole point is that right now, in a 1% flood, water will not "run to the bay" fast enough to avoid flooding a large part of downtown Mountain View, including a large swath of El Camino Real. This would affect a lot of people, even those who don't live in the flood plain. Many people work there or travel through it.
Why don't they just build an Ark? It would be a monument to the stupidity of modern government.
Just stick a pipe in the ground and run the flood to the tank under Graham Middle Schools holding tank. Of course if it's full, you're hosed.
This is a huge waste of money at this time. And by the way, if the district has the cash from 2000, how about giving it back?
Or how about free water until all the money from that bond runs out?
I didn't vote for this crap.
I think this would be a good opportunity for Mountain View to have a redesigned park space, without having to reach into its own coffers to fund. The Water District will be funding all the work, and the City can leverage the Water District's desire to build this to specify what improvements will be made at the site.
We have precedent for doing these types of projects. The green space for Graham Middle School was totally redone, when Mountain View Public works installed a new underground water storage tank a couple of years ago. At the time, the school district negotiated with the City to have it pay for all the improvements to the playing fields. If you compare the condition of Graham's green space now, and what it was before that project, it was night and day. And with no expense to the School District.
Also, its important to note that with the relatively flat elevation of the City of Mountain View, its likely a 100 year flood will affect more than just a few homes in the vicinity of the flood basin, so this project is beneficial to the City as a whole.
"Just stick a pipe in the ground and run the flood to the tank under Graham Middle Schools holding tank. Of course if it's full, you're hosed."
Um, you'd be hosed in more than ways than you've anticipated. The holding tank at Graham is used to store potable water for the City, to be used for emergencies or when the City's growth requires the additional capacity.
Are you suggesting to contaminate the City's emergency drinking water supply with non-potable flood water?
Just because some other area agency is paying for a project like this out of its budget rather than a City of Mountain View budget does not mean we residents are not paying for it. I guess I would say to the Doc, give us our money back in this case. Maybe an idea like that voiced by Mike to offset the high cost of water is the best thing. Spend less, be happy.
Er, but it's NOT your money. The funds the Valley Water District will be using for this project comes in part from the sale of bonds approved by the voters of Santa Clara county in 2000. As long as its being used for it intended purpose, this money isn't ours for us to say specifically how its spent. Alot of what the Water District does is maintenance and projects to PREVENT flooding, as part of its water management duties.
And spending less isn't a pearl of wisdom to be taken to extremes without considering the consequences on a case by case basis. Being penny wise and pound foolish comes to mind. Whatever funds are saved by the Water District will be less than the costs in damage a major flood incident will have to the City and residents, if it were to occur.
Let's put it this way, the Water District has determined that its worth spending their budgeted money to mitigate flood issues for Mountain View. I don't see an ulterior motive here that makes this a bad deal for the City.
Getting new park and recreational spaces at McKelvey park is just icing on the cake.
Seldon's hit the nail on the head.
This one's win-win.
Exactly correct Seldon. The water district is going to spend the money (millions) somewhere. Better to spend in Mtn View. There is no downside here. We get protection, new fields, it's a win-win. This is a no brainer.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Bailey Park
- Blossom Valley
- Castro City
- Cuesta Park
- Jackson Park
- Monta Loma
- North Bayshore
- North Whisman
- Old Mountain View
- Rengstorff Park
- Rex Manor
- Shoreline West
- St. Francis Acres
- Stierlin Estates
- Sylvan Park
- The Crossings
- Waverly Park
- Whisman Station
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Men Are Good For Three Things
By Laura Stec | 29 comments | 2,609 views
Yes on Measure B to improve our quality of life and public safety
By Steve Levy | 5 comments | 482 views
Cellphone Charging Challenges
By Angela Hey | 0 comments | 374 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Mountain View
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
© 2014 Mountain View Online
All rights reserved.