Town Square

Post a New Topic

Council approves $100K for HSR images

Original post made on Mar 24, 2010

In an attempt to ensure that high speed rail doesn't ruin Mountain View's landscape, the City Council on Tuesday decided to pay a design firm $100,000 to create 3-D sketches of high speed rail crossings at Rengstorff Avenue and Castro Street.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, March 24, 2010, 4:32 PM

Comments (12)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by localmom
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Mar 24, 2010 at 9:04 pm

I'm just wondering if this was subjected to competetive bidding. This sounds like an OUTRAGEOUS amount of money.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by parent
a resident of Waverly Park
on Mar 24, 2010 at 10:28 pm

Ditto, localmom.

$100K for "sketches" sure sounds like a lot of money spent on consultants, when there are conversations about cutting community services like Deer Hollow Farm, etc.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Steve
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Mar 25, 2010 at 2:22 am

Who cares, it's just tax payer money. Note from the article that we are now spending 200k on consultants.

If you ran a company like the goverment is run, you'd be bankcrupt

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Mountain View Resident
a resident of North Whisman
on Mar 25, 2010 at 11:16 am

What a ridiculous wastage of money! We need to fire these idiots who make such decisions. Lousy bureaucrats will do anything to save their hides. I betcha these blokes would not even know where to begin analyzing the reports even if the conclusions stared them in their faces. Fire these lousy blokes and save money for schools and so many other expenses. No wonder our property taxes keep increasing with such idiots in office.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sad
a resident of Whisman Station
on Mar 25, 2010 at 12:55 pm

A lot of money to spend on something that is so far out there and has so many more problems to get through before it reaches us. Sad to see them spend money like this when they are talking about cutting jobs and funding to services that are in the community instead of something that is just going to go speeding through the community.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by eric
a resident of another community
on Mar 25, 2010 at 12:57 pm

Ever compared an artist's rendering of a project like this with what actually gets built? The rendering will be a dolled-up, dream world view of what is getting rammed down our throats. It will certainly not show the disruption of residential areas nor the guaranteed mega-density that will be required in downtown as a result of this boondoggle.

$100K to blow sunshine up the collective skirt of the city.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jake
a resident of another community
on Mar 25, 2010 at 3:27 pm

The possibility of this fast train is still in the pipe dream stage... For god's sake, the landscaping is years away (if ever), and the issue of at grade, tunnel or raised is also years away.

Do we need a $100,000.00 study for that ? Of course, below grade (a sunken ditch like Reno did), or raised track (like Bart) is a function of cost. A Grade Street level track is just Nuts... why disrupt that intersection any more than it is now ? I'll make a recommendation for a lot less than $100,000.00.. Send me twenty bucks and I'll tell you my recommendations.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Margaret
a resident of Willowgate
on Mar 25, 2010 at 3:40 pm

I would have voted to spend the money on teachers! Glad that my vote for John Inks wasn't wasted.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Rodger
a resident of Sylvan Park
on Mar 25, 2010 at 9:56 pm

We are like deer in the headlights here in Mountain View, we should have been fighting for an underground High Speed Rail months ago, now it's way too late.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Robert
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Mar 26, 2010 at 8:11 am

The City of Mountain View cares more about the "landscape" than it does about its employees and city services. Consider this: in these tough economic times MV has spent close to $20 MILLION on land at Moffett and 101; close to $2 MILLION on a church on Escuela Ave; close to $10 MILLION on a new fire station by Shoreline park; and now $200,000 on high speed rail consultants? We're talking well over $30 MILLION DOLLARS on nonessential items. If this doesn't outrage you I don't know what will. Think about where the real problem lies before you bash city employees. Mountain View's "leadership" want the citizens to believe it's firefighters and police breaking the bank but in reality it's irresponsible spending and backwards priorities at City Hall.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by ryan
a resident of another community
on Mar 29, 2010 at 6:46 pm

budget crises? what budget crises??

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Thom
a resident of Jackson Park
on Mar 30, 2010 at 3:04 pm

Good thing Mountain View is floating in money.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Spring food and drink goings on
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 2,324 views

Couple’s Strife: 3 Tools for a Happier Relationship
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,145 views

Fathers, Touch Your Daughters!
By Caroline Fleck | 15 comments | 609 views

The Drought: Shared Inconvenience, Shared Responsibility, Shared Solutions
By Steve Levy | 4 comments | 502 views

Hi from China
By Laura Stec | 5 comments | 447 views