Town Square

Post a New Topic

Council supports three-story condos at 333 Rengstorff

Original post made on May 19, 2010

The City Council gave thumbs up to a high-density condo project last week after a developer spent years improving on a previously rejected proposal for condos on the Rengstorff Avenue site.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 11:40 AM

Comments (8)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by John the Man
a resident of Old Mountain View
on May 19, 2010 at 2:22 pm

Do it. Do it.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Where?
a resident of Castro City
on May 19, 2010 at 2:26 pm

Does anyone know if the project is on North or South Rengstorff.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Marc
a resident of Blossom Valley
on May 19, 2010 at 2:56 pm

North Rengstorff


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Martin Omander
a resident of Rex Manor
on May 19, 2010 at 3:01 pm

I'm guessing it's 333 *North* Rengstorff. The Community Development Department Summary in the city's budget for 08/09 mentions:

Process a rezoning and development project for a proposed 64 unit project at 333 North Rengstorff Avenue.

(Link to budget: Web Link)


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Bruce Karney
a resident of Old Mountain View
on May 19, 2010 at 6:43 pm

Is a 34 units/acre development really "high density"? Compared to projects recently built and approved in Mountain View, "high density" doesn't seem like an accurate description to me.

(Yes, it is twice as dense as what's there now, but does THAT what defines high density, or is the absolute number of dwelling units per acre?)

In any event, I'm pleased with the Council's decision.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Rodger
a resident of Sylvan Park
on May 20, 2010 at 12:02 pm

We need to stop adding to the density of Mountain View. When will it end?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by snawet
a resident of Shoreline West
on May 20, 2010 at 7:20 pm

Good. I'm buying a house but it's in San jose. All the houses in MV are expensive and they are these post-war wrecks that need to be torn down. Ditto for all of the other "condos" that are just old rotting apartment conversions from the 50s.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Mike R
a resident of Old Mountain View
on May 21, 2010 at 5:26 pm

Didn't Prometheus say that anything less than 61 units/acre would not be financially feasible? But here it is 34 units/acre? It seems that developers are quick to say that "Anything less than <insert number here> is not financially feasible".


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Cho's, beloved dim sum spot, to reopen in Los Altos
By Elena Kadvany | 8 comments | 6,018 views

Why I Became Active in Palo Alto Forward
By Steve Levy | 12 comments | 2,344 views

Early Decision Blues
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 2,004 views

With a Perspective....
By Ms. Jenson | 0 comments | 412 views

10 Tried and True Ways to Increase Happiness
By Caroline Fleck | 0 comments | 96 views