Town Square

Post a New Topic

Council OKs affordable housing for 51 families

Original post made on Jun 24, 2010

A lucky group of 51 low-income families will have unusually affordable housing in an unusually high-quality development, thanks to a City Council decision made Tuesday.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, June 24, 2010, 1:48 PM

Comments (11)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by steve
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Jun 24, 2010 at 2:35 pm

I'm looking forward to the towns of Atherton and Hillsborough putting in BMR housing so I can live there!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by letsgetreal
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Jun 24, 2010 at 3:12 pm

Ha ha ha Steve. Me too!! Let's not forget Los Altos and Palo Alto. But I agree, I'd much rather hang in Atherton. funnnny.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jeffrey
a resident of The Crossings
on Jun 24, 2010 at 8:24 pm

How magnanimous of the city council.

Or not.

It's the city council's fault that rents and housing prices are so high to begin with. How about rolling back all the stupid zoning laws that prevent developers from building dense urban dwellings like high rises. I'm stuck paying $2000 a month in rent for a less than 1000 sq ft. Roll back the zoning laws, and watch homes go up while rents and prices come down, and tax revenues increase. Everyone wins.

The free market has its shortcomings, but this is one case where it performs better than any council could ever plan.

City council, you're not making things better; you're making them worse. Get out of the way and stop playing kingmaker.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by huh
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Jun 24, 2010 at 11:22 pm

Is this really true?:

"50 percent of the area median income, which is $96,000 a year for a family of four"

Seems a bit high. I guess they are only considering the government jobs.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by priorities
a resident of Blossom Valley
on Jun 25, 2010 at 12:35 am

really... some studies have shown BMR housing actually serves to reduce affordability, yet in these days of $5M city budget gaps, laid off teachers and reduced police staffing, we still find the money for 51 "gold plated" BMR units???


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Please stop the madness
a resident of Shoreline West
on Jun 25, 2010 at 12:22 pm

It is hard to believe a city that crys wolf and wants to take away services and employee funds when they make purchases like this and lets not forget the Moffett Blvd land that is going to sit there for years to come.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Lisa
a resident of Blossom Valley
on Jun 25, 2010 at 2:24 pm

As I understand it, the City collects fees from the for profit developers to assist with building the affordable housing. I for one do not want to live in a town where only the rich can afford to live.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by priorities
a resident of Blossom Valley
on Jun 25, 2010 at 9:42 pm

Lisa... the fees from the "for profit developers" make those new homes in Blossom Valley (e.g. Satake Estates and Classics at Miramonte) cost just a bit more... which in turn raises property values and makes all but BMR houses LESS affordable. BMR and the preferred funding mechanism (taxes on new construction) raise real estate prices, not lower them. BMR goes against basic economics (supply-demand). If we really want more affordable housing in Mountain View, we should be against restrictions on zoning and advocate for high-rise developments to increase supply... not onesies and twosies that supply a drop in the bucket of demand. Further, there are affordable housing options in Mountain View, they just aren't very nice... a search of craigslist will turn up 2 bdrm apts around $800/mo, and 3 bdrm under $2K. I'd like a beachfront villa in Carmel I can afford, should the owners there feel ashamed that they are not willing to provide BMR for us lowly rich people (as opposed to filthy rich)?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by DCS
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Jun 25, 2010 at 11:29 pm

I agree with "priorities," all the research shows that BMR only makes housing less affordable.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by palo alto mom
a resident of another community
on Jun 27, 2010 at 4:41 pm

Palo Alto, Los Altos and Menlo Park all have BMR housing - can't seem to find any in Atherton or Hillsborough, sorry guys...


 +   Like this comment
Posted by No BMR
a resident of Jackson Park
on Jun 27, 2010 at 5:31 pm

No for BMR housing...Yes, for better dinning and shopping downtown (like Palo Alto).


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Death with Dignity
By Chandrama Anderson | 6 comments | 1,465 views

Strong Regional Job and Population Growth Continues
By Steve Levy | 7 comments | 1,017 views

Just Stuff Me and Wrap Me Up
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 1,016 views

10 Tried and True Ways to Increase Happiness
By Caroline Fleck | 2 comments | 624 views

With a Perspective....
By Ms. Jenson | 0 comments | 492 views