Town Square

Post a New Topic

Council split on outsourcing golf course

Original post made on Jul 1, 2010

With a nearly $1 million deficit at Shoreline Golf links threatening the city budget, the City Council is split over whether to outsource the city-owned and operated golf course Tuesday.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, July 2, 2010, 12:00 AM

Comments (3)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Taxpayer
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Jul 1, 2010 at 3:22 pm

Where are the priorities?

Sure it's great to have a city-run golf course, but when it is losing money those funds come from OTHER city programs and services. All those other cities save money by outsourcing - money that can then be spent on critical and core city services.

Until and unless Council is willing to fully fund the police and library, we should not be subsidizing the golf course. And the proposal here is to do just what most other cities already do, and outsource it. Do that, keep the overall budget balanced, and spend the savings on areas like police and library.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by curious
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Jul 4, 2010 at 7:36 am

"the cost of paying the union-organized employees at the golf course rose from $1.4 million to $2.1 million from 2000 to 2009, with average pay per employee increasing from $46,100 to $86,900 a year. Maintenance workers are organized under the Service Employees International Union, while managers and pro-shop employees are organized under the EAGLES."

"council members Margaret Abe-Koga, Jac Siegel and Laura Macias opposed outsourcing the operation Tuesday."

Well, now we know who these people truly represent. Here's a hint, its not the taxpayers or the voters. It's the government employees' unions. Abe-Koga, Siegel and Macias were bought and paid for and they are now coming through.

Cudos to the Voice for pointing out the outrageous wages being paid to the unions. How does this compare to your pay?

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Michael
a resident of Stierlin Estates
on Jul 5, 2010 at 1:35 pm

If the revenues from Shoreline never make it to the rest of the city, then suggesting that general revenues flow to bailout Shoreline would be counterproductive as well as counterintuitive. It would, however, be a great way for elected officials to lose their next election.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Freebirds Palo Alto shutters, Pieology to move in
By Elena Kadvany | 14 comments | 3,585 views

A Glimpse into local HS Suicide
By Chandrama Anderson | 14 comments | 2,714 views

Deny the 429 Univ Ave Project Appeal
By Steve Levy | 11 comments | 1,749 views

Now Playing - Your Dinner!
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 1,016 views

Teens and Cutting, What's Going On?
By Caroline Fleck | 0 comments | 302 views