Town Square

Post a New Topic

NASA requests $32.8 million for Hangar One

Original post made on Feb 14, 2011

NASA has requested $32.8 million to restore iconic Hangar One at Moffett Field, potentially ending a long preservation battle.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, February 14, 2011, 4:14 PM

Comments (10)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by The Eye
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Feb 14, 2011 at 6:49 pm

I'd love to see if it can really be done, as long as it can be done affordably. I'd be a shame to see it go, as it's been there all my life.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by PH
a resident of another community
on Feb 15, 2011 at 8:15 am

I've said it before and I'll say it again: Save this hanger as it has so much historic value and lots of future potential. Step up private business, especially Google, as well as others. It would be easy for a few to give enough to get the project done. It is an opportunity to do something good for the future.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by The Ear
a resident of The Crossings
on Feb 15, 2011 at 11:19 am

Ames will lose 12 jobs but gain $32.8M to save the hangar. Sounds like a net gain of jobs.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Rossta
a resident of Waverly Park
on Feb 15, 2011 at 8:53 pm

Rossta is a registered user.

I would love to see Hanger 1 saved. Before I moved to Mountain View, that hanger was all I knew of the area.

Now, here is a puzzler: for about the same money, we could save Caltrain. Thousands of people ride Caltrain every day (not me, but I benefit from those who ride it not being on the road). So, which is a better use of our money?

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Scott
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Feb 16, 2011 at 7:44 am

Not that this is an either/or situation, but I'd put $30M into Caltrain before I'd put it into Hanger One.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by LaLa
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Feb 16, 2011 at 2:28 pm

As I understand it, the problem with Google etc, putting money into restoration and thus hoping to use the facilities, is that due to it being a military installation, if there is any hint of a national or local threat, civilians would be shut out (and evacuated) for as long as the Brass deemed necessary. That would put a big Bummer into investing lots of money only to be told you can't use the facility. And we all know how sloooooow the guv'ment moves!

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Expoman
a resident of another community
on Feb 17, 2011 at 8:29 am

How could we run a world expo at Moffett if they could take-it-back at any time? Is that the arrangement between NASA and the military?

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Political Insider
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Feb 17, 2011 at 6:34 pm

Waste of money.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by the_punnisher
a resident of Whisman Station
on Feb 17, 2011 at 11:09 pm

the_punnisher is a registered user.

I'll say it again:

Colorado saved their military installation, and the hangers were no where near the size or as famous as Hangar One!

Wings over the Rockies is supported by local businesses.

Web Link

The history of Moffett Field in the SFBA is important enough for every major manufacturer to kick in some money; GTE and Ford Aerospace along with Lockheed Martin are just a few of the many companies who benefited from Moffett Field. This was before the Johnny come lately types like the fat cats who cut a sweet deal to base their GA craft there.

Maybe a little bit of investigative work on those deals is in order.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by ARC employee
a resident of Blossom Valley
on Feb 18, 2011 at 9:46 pm

Is that 12 jobs in addition to all the expiring ARRA jobs, or 12 jobs total? returning to 2008 levels is not unreasonable, as the stimulus that grew the contractor workforce over the past two years was intended as temporary shot in the arm to help the economy get through the worst... never intended to be a permanent increase in NASA payroll. As far as CalTrain vs Hangar One? Unless a business case can be made for Hangar One, that is a good question to pose... However, if a good business case can be made, it would look favorable by comparison, as CalTrain is a perpetual money sink (as are most other mass transit systems). Unfortunately, there just aren't enough people interested in riding Caltrain to make it pay for itself... driving is just so much more convenient for most.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Spring food and drink goings on
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 2,453 views

Couple’s Strife: 3 Tools for a Happier Relationship
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,211 views

The Drought: Shared Inconvenience, Shared Responsibility, Shared Solutions
By Steve Levy | 6 comments | 645 views

China, Interrupted
By Laura Stec | 7 comments | 580 views

Is Web Therapy a Good Idea?
By Caroline Fleck | 0 comments | 199 views