Town Square

Post a New Topic

Time to rethink history projects at Cuesta Annex

Original post made on Apr 1, 2011

What many residents involved in Cuesta Annex workshops thought would be retained as natural open space has become the City Council's dumping ground of things not natural.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, April 1, 2011, 12:00 AM

Comments (3)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by basin still on?
a resident of St. Francis Acres
on Apr 1, 2011 at 8:18 am

"If the large water retention basin takes up the entire front portion.."

Mountain View Voice should really do a follow-up on the status of the Permanente Creek flood protection project. At this point it seems unlikely there will ever be a flood basin at Cuesta. The Cuesta Annex basin was meant as an overflow from the upstream basin at Blach Middle School which was nixed by the Los Altos School District.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by USA
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Apr 1, 2011 at 1:53 pm

USA is a registered user.

Thank you, Andi.

That idea of cutting down trees to put them in a tree museum is ridiculous. The idea of paving over the last remaining bits of open land in Mountain View to create a museum to Mountain View's agriculture past is equally ridiculous especially with so many vacant building available.



 +   Like this comment
Posted by Doug Pearson
a resident of Blossom Valley
on Apr 2, 2011 at 11:37 am

As I understand it, the gist of Andi Sandstrom's article is: It's best to leave Cuesta Annex alone and, regardless of whether the flood basin and landscaping are done, the History Museum and its additional parking and the Pearson (no relation) House do not belong in the Cuesta Annex.

I, for one, see the Cuesta Annex as a vacant lot that should be improved as long as the City doesn't have to spend a lot of money doing it.

I would like to see landscaping, and both the flood basin proposal and the idea of planting a small orchard are appealing. Paths, benches and trash cans would be nice.

The History Museum does not belong in Cuesta Annex. It belongs somewhere else. I like downtown in the fake adobe building, the imitation train station, or one of the old buildings. Not Pioneer Park, however; that is a graveyard and we've "improved" it too much already. The History Museum's problem is they have no money for purchase or rental of a building, or even for displaying their artifacts.

The Pearson House does not belong in Cuesta Annex, either. I would like to see it near the Rengstorff House and would not object to siting the History Museum there--though three buildings would probably be too crowded.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Don't fund the rape culture at my alma mater
By Jessica T | 37 comments | 3,074 views

Palo Alto and Bay Area Election Facts and Thoughts on the Implications
By Steve Levy | 18 comments | 1,625 views

I am Grateful for Love
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,277 views