Who’s City Is It Anyway???
Original post made by Ogaz Family, Cuesta Park, on Apr 25, 2011
We feel that the development process does not represent the neighborhoods well. The staff and the developer drive the direction of development and the residents and taxpayers are not being heard. The staff and the developer will not have to live near this house yet they are the ones that have a "place at the table". The residents who are affected by a project should have a real voice and be heard, yet in reality they have minimal impact. This process needs to react to and be sensitive to the community needs. In the city's own description of the Development Review Committee, it states that one of its purpose's is to 'determine if a project will be compatible with the site and surrounding developments by evaluating the project as it relates to the character of the neighborhood, the massing of the building structure and the architectural style and detailing'. This has not been happening. The input of the residents is muted. The developer had a meeting with the local residents a few weeks ago, looking for input on his project but he ultimately turned in his plans to the city a few days later with no changes made in response to the critical comments voiced at the meeting.
There is a last Public Hearing in front of the Zoning Administrator specifically on the variance considerations for this project and any other issues relating to this development. Please attend this last Hearing on this development April 27th at 4:00 p.m. in the Plaza Conference Room at City Hall, so the city will realize that resident voters do want a say in the development of their city and not just what city Staff thinks we should have. The project plans are available for review at the city planning counter. Come to the meeting and give your input and support!!
Mixx, Scott's Seafood replacement, opens in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 14 comments | 3,689 views
The Relation of Palo Alto School Finance and Development--Background Concepts and Data Sources
By Steve Levy | 0 comments | 542 views