Town Square

Post a New Topic

Couple return home to burglary in progress

Original post made on Jul 11, 2011

A Mountain View couple came home in the middle of a burglary Sunday afternoon, police said. About $4,000 in jewelry, electronics and cash was taken.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, July 11, 2011, 5:46 PM

Comments (9)

Posted by The Eye, a resident of Old Mountain View
on Jul 11, 2011 at 10:47 pm

The Eye is a registered user.

"When they went to investigate they found the window, which they said had been closed and locked, was open, the screen was removed and the blinds had been ripped from where they hung in the window frame."

"Police found no sign of forced entry."

These two statements don't correlate.

Typically, the screen would be removed from the *outside* to provide greater access to the window frame for jimmying open. I'm willing to accept that the blinds *may* have been ripped down during a hasty retreat, but since the screen was "removed" and not bent or destroyed, it's pretty easy to ascertain that entry was from the window, even though locked, and these thieves knew what they were doing. But then, what do *I* know? I'm only a certified private investigator who works in the security industry designing systems to keep people like this out. C'mon, MVPD...You really need to up your standards for your investigative staff. Geez.


Posted by Jesse, a resident of Castro City
on Jul 12, 2011 at 6:11 am

Is this near the Day Worker Center?


Posted by MV Resident, a resident of Jackson Park
on Jul 12, 2011 at 9:15 am

@Jesse:

Based on a quick online map search, the answer is no.


Posted by Ron, a resident of Waverly Park
on Jul 12, 2011 at 2:36 pm

As usual, "The Eye" comes off like a pretty armature detective. Many window types cannot be easily jimmied. If this is one such common window, that would explain the police statement that it did not look like forced entry. Your explanation would have the burglar come in the bedroom window, go to the kitchen and get the milk, go back to the bedroom to ransack, and then happen to be by the same entry point when the owners came back. More likely, burglar came in some other way, grabbed milk on way through kitchen, found the bedroom to ransack it, and then quickly fled out the closest window then the owners came home, removing the screen and damaging the blinds in the process. But hey, like you said, what do *you* know.


Posted by George, a resident of Rex Manor
on Jul 12, 2011 at 4:06 pm

I would suggest a background and financial check on this couple. Didn't they here the guy/guys/gal/gals going out the window? Did they run outside to see who or if someone was around the place ? Were the jewelry items in the duffel bag (great hiding place).. Why did they leave without their cell phone ? Why did they leave a wallet with #1,000.00 in cash at home ?
Lots of funny stuff going on here.. Finger prints on the Milk Container? Refridg. door ? Window, blinds.... lots to look into, but I doubt if MVPD will have or use the powers of CSI to solve this one..
Hmmmm could be a movie of the week...

George


Posted by George, a resident of Rex Manor
on Jul 12, 2011 at 4:08 pm

I meant "HEAR", not "HERE" in that last comment..

Geo.


Posted by The Eye, a resident of Old Mountain View
on Jul 12, 2011 at 6:12 pm

The Eye is a registered user.

@Ron:

"a pretty armature detective" The word is *amateur*, genius. And I have agency working experience, and a certificate to show it. As usual, you got squat. Go play somewhere else. Oh, and pick up a dictionary while you're at it.


Posted by USA, a resident of Old Mountain View
on Jul 12, 2011 at 7:49 pm

800 block of E. El Camino Real is near Sylvan. I assume that it is the Archstone apartments, which are the only residences on the 800 block of E El Camino.


Posted by Ron, a resident of Waverly Park
on Jul 13, 2011 at 10:18 am

Yeah you got me. I typo'd and let the spell check correct to the wrong word. Whatever. Attacking someones spelling on a comment board is a well known desperation move on the internet for those who have nothing else to come back with.

Point is, you skipped all of my points. You attack the MVPD while having no decent analysis of your own. It's YOU who have "squat" (and this time the term is use in proper context).

If one DOES assume there is something wrong with the case as stated, GEORGE above has a MUCH more plausible explanation than you do, although it could also be as simple as I described as well.

My point is that you like to attack the MVPD, but often your theories in doing so make little logical sense.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Touring the Southern California “Ivies:” Pomona and Cal Tech
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 5 comments | 3,067 views

Couples: Parallel Play or Interactive Play?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,350 views

Just say no
By Jessica T | 6 comments | 1,273 views

Questions for Council Candidates--Housing
By Steve Levy | 12 comments | 629 views

Palo Alto quietly gets new evening food truck market
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 295 views