Town Square

Post a New Topic

Army: toxic cleanup is not our problem

Original post made on Apr 5, 2012

Activists and regulators are at odds with the U.S. Army over toxics contaminating Orion Park, a former housing complex site just outside Moffett Field.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, April 5, 2012, 10:09 AM

Comments (5)

Posted by Old Ben, a resident of Shoreline West
on Apr 5, 2012 at 1:51 pm

TCE was used in cleaning circuit boards. Fairchild, anyone?


Posted by Informed Ben, a resident of North Whisman
on Apr 5, 2012 at 2:21 pm

The TCE plumes on both sides of 101 are well mapped and understood, as are the directions of their movements. The plume under Orion Park is not from the semiconductor manufacturers that used to operate on the other side of 101.


Posted by Otto Maddox, a resident of Monta Loma
on Apr 5, 2012 at 3:02 pm

Is this a new plume? The existing plume map(s) that I have seen didn't show anything in the Orion Park area.

The plume was on the base itself. Actually running right under Hangar 1. (Another reason not to save that white elephant).


Posted by Martin Omander, a resident of Rex Manor
on Apr 5, 2012 at 4:46 pm

Let us keep incidents like this in mind when we plan new development. Thorough environmental impact studies are important. You can probably break ground on a new project quicker if you don't do one. But cleaning up after the fact is almost always more expensive and contentious than not polluting in the first place.


Posted by Jeff, a resident of Old Mountain View
on Apr 5, 2012 at 6:12 pm

Fairchild, Intel and Raytheon had semiconductor manufacturing operations (not actually using TCE for circuit board cleaning, but similar) in the area of Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman (MEW) that was under EPA Superfund supervision in the 1980s. Extensive long-term remediation projects began then - soil excavation and aeration, walls deep underground around sites with extraction systems, and so forth. The good news is that the companies took responsibility and that the TCE had not reached any drinking water supply wells. The MEW "merged plume" was known to head under 101 towards Moffett, where there was evidence of an underground concentration of TCE from washing off airplanes and so forth. Because the subsurface hydrogeology in the MEW area is very jumbled, and there were multiple sources there and at Moffett, it was not possible to depict the clear flow of materials in distinct streams. Nevertheless, as Old Ben notes, there were reasonable maps of where the stuff from any one source was heading. It was widely speculated that some day the amount of stuff under and likely around Moffett would get more attention, which seems to be the case as various land repurposing projects come along.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Indian street food and ... bitcoins?
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 3,133 views

Analyze data yourself with R - a fast growing language for statistics, forecasting and graphs
By Angela Hey | 2 comments | 2,387 views

Most Seniors do not Need Senior Housing But Could Benefit from other Choice to Remain in Palo Alto
By Steve Levy | 31 comments | 1,363 views

"The Galapagos Affair: Satan Came to Eden"
By Anita Felicelli | 0 comments | 1,120 views

Crittenden Hosts Startup Weekend
By Ms. Jenson | 1 comment | 222 views