Town Square

Post a New Topic

Neighbors threaten to sue over McKelvey plan

Original post made on Dec 5, 2012

A plan to turn McKelvey Park into a flood detention basin has drawn the ire of neighbors who say they may sue over plans that could increase noise from the park's baseball fields while removing the large redwood trees that shade their homes.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, December 5, 2012, 1:55 PM

Comments (13)

Posted by Downstream, a resident of Rex Manor
on Dec 5, 2012 at 2:57 pm

Once again, we see selfish NIMBYism opposing something that's good for a larger community. How much noise do you get from a Little League field? And the kids are only there during the day. I also don't like to see trees removed, but new trees will grow back. Basically, these people don't give a damn if their downstream neighbors get flooded out. As long as their own little lives are not inconvenienced.


Posted by NW Resident, a resident of North Whisman
on Dec 5, 2012 at 3:15 pm

One minor inaccuracy of the article is that only Big McKelvey's field orientation is being rotated in this design, compared with its current layout today. Little McKelvey keeps its current orientation, facing Miramonte Ave.

Whichever way the big field ultimately faces, it seems that one row of bleachers will still have to be on the MV Avenue side near the residents, unless it's rotated so that home plate is near Miramonte, which doesn't seem like a very good fit.


Posted by Julia, a resident of The Crossings
on Dec 5, 2012 at 3:55 pm

Sucks that they want to remove large established redwoods.


Posted by Konrad M. Sosnow, a resident of another community
on Dec 5, 2012 at 4:07 pm

It seems to me that the Santa Clara Valley Water District has a lot of money and wants to dig somewhere. Now that they have abandoned plans to dig up Cuesta Park Annex, they need another playground. How about letting them go out to the salt ponds and play there?


Posted by Anna S., a resident of Rex Manor
on Dec 5, 2012 at 8:38 pm

Keep the redwoods.


Posted by Saejin, a resident of Shoreline West
on Dec 6, 2012 at 12:36 am

At the meeting the water district said it would cost 80 Million to update Permanente Creek so that it could carry the 100 year flood and they were only given 40 Million, so they elected to build the retention pond. Keep in mind the park will be badly damaged each time they flood it. The retention approach only handles a short term peak, beyond which it does not fix the problem. Clearly a bandaid not a fix.
Complete waste of money.

This park will have lights. It will have loud speakers announcing each batter up. If I lived next door I would take the city to court to block this design. A large portion of the park is being used for parking lot without a single tree for shade. Why not put the parking next to the houses? Beter yet.... fix the creek... leave the park alone....


Posted by please be nice to one another, a resident of St. Francis Acres
on Dec 6, 2012 at 3:50 am

I wanted to point out the report by the water district, which has the areas of former and projected flooding well laid out - Figure 4-1 in this doc:

Web Link

All the other reports etc. are available here (it is amazing to which level of detail things have been planned; one has to wonder how governments can get anything done):
Web Link

While the plans aren't perfect, and probably cannot be, one should consider the benefits that this project brings to the area, and if you look closely at the map, actually including the houses next to the park. Without protection, they will probably get flooded sooner or later.

Hopefully some compromise can be found with respect to how McKelvey park should be upgraded with the new flood protection feature. Shrinking the big field just a tad so it can be rotated and provide some space for trees to fit in, or doing away with one of the circles would seem sensible, perhaps. It would seem that kids can easily walk from either circle to the fields or the park, and the circles use valuable space (including perhaps, the right one might make rotation of the big field harder?).

By the way, one funny thing. If you look at this from a satellite picture, the area that's immediately south of it ... is yet another baseball field. One kinda does wonder how many baseball fields are needed on such a short stretch. But please ... lawsuits seem like a pretty inefficient way to find a solution / improvement. Thanks for being considerate!


Posted by Otto Maddox, a resident of Monta Loma
on Dec 6, 2012 at 2:43 pm

$10 million to plan for a storm that has a 1% chance of happening each year?

And how did Mountain View buy for the last 100 years without this flood basin?


Posted by Garrett, a resident of another community
on Dec 6, 2012 at 4:20 pm

The time we get any flood project work done, the 100 year would have happened already.


Posted by Cynthia Riordan, a resident of another community
on Dec 6, 2012 at 8:59 pm

The water district's flood projections are exaggerated by 200%. Although they have been collecting data on water levels for decades, they have not used this data in their flood projections because the data does not show a need for flood basins. A large 2 acre pond in Rancho San Antonio has been handling Permanente Creek overflow since the 1950's. Permanente Creek has not flooded since the culvert behind Blach School was built in 1959.


Posted by information, a resident of another community
on Dec 6, 2012 at 11:03 pm

Dear Cynthia, your assertions seem incorrect. Since 1959, the creek has flooded at least three times (1983, 1995, 1998). See Fig. 31, "Recent Flooding":
Web Link

Can you please explain where your 200% number comes from? If you have done research that is more thorough than what's in the study done by the district, please elaborate and link to it.


Posted by Political Insider, a resident of Old Mountain View
on Dec 7, 2012 at 9:45 am

"This park will have lights. It will have loud speakers announcing each batter up. If I lived next door I would take the city to court to block this design."

The baseball park already has these amenities. If you move near a park, school , or a baseball field you should expect noise.


Posted by Ralph, a resident of another community
on Dec 7, 2012 at 10:12 am

This is needed because of global warming and raising sea levels will soon cause Mountain View to be under water. So unless you all want to live under water you better give in to this. Live in fear of global warming and give hundreds of billions to the UN so they will save all of us.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

September food and drink goings on
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 1,491 views

College Freshmen: Avoiding the Pitfalls
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 1,292 views

Camp Glamp
By Laura Stec | 8 comments | 1,153 views

Parents Texting with Kids in the Car
By Chandrama Anderson | 7 comments | 621 views

Property rights and the will of the people
By Steve Levy | 7 comments | 375 views