Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Feb 26, 2014
We're voting yes. Public parks are way cheaper and more fun than watching TV or going to the gym.
Its one thing to be surrounded by beautiful open land, its another to be allowed liberal ACCESS to that land. I lived in San Luis Obispo for many years, a place known for its beautiful vistas and undeveloped land. Unfortunately most all of that open land is privately owned by ranchers or other groups, keep the public off it entirely. You can look, but always from a distance.
After moving the the Bay Area, it became apparent that open land it just 1/2 the equation. Open and Accessible land completes the formula.
We're voting Yes
What about housing?
What would you like the board of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District to say about housing, and why? Do you want housing in Open Space land?
The land that the open space district owns is in the flood prone bayshore area and in the earthquake zone west of I-280. Building more housing is not very practical in either area. Preserving this land as parks and wildlife refuges makes perfect sense.
Good point about housing -- we definitely need more of it! But we should get more housing by rezoning existing areas in Mountain View, not by paving over open space with suburban sprawl that requires everyone to drive everywhere.
Why are renters getting a free ride here? The POSC should charge a usage based entry fee, so those folks who use it can pay for it. And why $300M? Sounds like a lot of pork for the entitled few who can afford to drive out to the coast. But what else should you expect from a tax authority?
Garret is exactly right. The majority of this land should have housing on it. POSC is partly responsible for the limited housing stock in the bay area.
Omander, this is not about housing, but about open space.
Mt. View can not handle more housing. It's saturated as it is already. There are a lot and i mean a lot of housings going up in San Jose. Just look at H85 and Cottle.
What's $300 million between friends? This is certainly something that Google should pay for.
Come on, renters are not getting a free ride. Of course, landlords are passing along that $3/year to their tenants.
Remember that the total that is advertised here is going to be spent over 40 years. This is not like a highway project that costs billions every year.
"...the entitled few who can afford to drive out to the coast."
Aside from the point that the original poster is clueless about areas closer by like Ranch San Antonio, I'm just gonna let that quote stand as an example of how the original poster views tings. People who can drive 35 minutes are entitled. I guess other entitled folks can choose to drive to Tracy in the other direction. Anyway, now you can consider the source and the validity of their argument.
I am not saying build housing on upended space land, but lend support to the idea of in fill on El Camino Real and elsewhere.
Open land should be referred to as greenfields. El Camino Real and most of Mountain View and cities have giant brownfield sites.
Greenfields. Forests, grazing land, farms, meadows, marshes or food production land.
Brownfields. Homes, apartment buildings, strip malls, office parks, warehouses, parking lots, parking lots and paved over places.
Garrett83, its apparent that you're very confused about the abilities, goals and land holdings of Mid Pen. It seems you want a complete re-evaluation of MV's zoning of land within city boarders. That has nothing to do with Mid Pen...nothing at all.
That should be unbuilt open space not upended open space.
I support open space and farmland protection, it seems we will save a farm next to a major job center. Allow farms to be paved over because we don't high density near the job.
Saving views is more important then saving vegetables grown in a valley.
Mid Pen has done a out standing job, vote yes and keep the wonders of open space. I just think the open space supporters need to work with idea preserving greenfield sites and work with smart growthers.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Bailey Park
- Blossom Valley
- Castro City
- Cuesta Park
- Jackson Park
- Monta Loma
- North Bayshore
- North Whisman
- Old Mountain View
- Rengstorff Park
- Rex Manor
- Shoreline West
- St. Francis Acres
- Stierlin Estates
- Sylvan Park
- The Crossings
- Waverly Park
- Whisman Station
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Draeger’s Los Altos eyes upgrades, expansion
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 3,323 views
Housing is for People
By Steve Levy | 33 comments | 2,301 views
College Visit: Lehigh and Lafayette
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 4 comments | 1,631 views
Is Coffee a Date?
By Laura Stec | 18 comments | 1,372 views
Gratitude, Repairing and Avoiding Affairs
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 641 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Mountain View
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
© 2015 Mountain View Online
All rights reserved.