Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Aug 12, 2014
Does anyone happen to know what the least used station in the VTA light rail system is? Maybe that one should be closed too, if that would help speed up VTA service. Which is not fast.
When I use the light rail system, I usually get on at the Whisman station. But it would be nice to know what the least used station is.
Bayshore/NASA. Statistics can be found here: Web Link
No station between Mtn View and Fair Oaks breaks 300.
Good! Now close the rest of the stations and get rid of this joke of a light rail system entirely. It is a waste of taxpayer money.
It is my recollection from the meetings that were held when Light Rail was being designed that the reasons why the Evelyn Station was created was to serve riders who were dropped off ("kiss and ride") or who drove and parked at that station to access the light rail system.
Evelyn Station is very convenient to Hwy 85 and 237, but the anticipated demand from riders driving or being dropped off never occurred.
I have never used light rail, but if I did I would use the Evelyn station. 😥
Money is no object to the VTA - especially if it can get federal funds for frivolous projects. How about parking in Mountain View to ride the lightrail to Levi's stadium? Ingenious!
"How about parking in Mountain View to ride the lightrail to Levi's stadium?"
And even THAT didn't come off well, despite ample planning time. Complaints about inadequacy and infrequency of VTA trains featured prominently in the reporting of the opening game.
@another reader and money no object - taking the VTA to Levi's was actually supposed to be mostly Caltrain to Mountain View then VTA to Levi's. From reading the article, getting to Levi's by VTA was fine, getting home was terrible. One woman walked and beat the people riding VTA back to the car.
Give them a few games and hopefully the VTA will get it right. Or at least better.
@Another Reader et al. VTA should be able to handle the crowds better today since crews just completed a project to improve train frequency after the games. It's a essentially a storage track that allows train cars to queue up one after another so they can maximize the number of trains passing through the area during a given period of time. More trains = more capacity and less waiting. We'll know in a few hours how it works!
Once the double track project is complete in MV between the Caltrain Station and Whisman reliability and frequency should also improve.
It would make sense to have something similar to the Caltrain Bullet Trains on VTA lightrail. From those I know who use it (often SJSU students) it is painfully slow but a cheaper option. Surely to encourage ridership it would make sense to do something about encouraging more use of the system. Rather than closing a station near an area of high density homes being built, it would be better to improve the system, possibly with a bullet train system, to enable riders get to where they need to go quicker.
@PA Resident - "Rather than closing a station near an area of high density homes being built, it would be better to improve the system, possibly with a bullet train system, to enable riders get to where they need to go quicker."
Your statement is internally contradictory. The removal of Evelyn station is necessary to improve service and implement the possible express service that you're calling for - it's pretty much impossible to do express service along the Mountain View line with the current single-track section near Evelyn - trains can't just hop over each other.
And what "high-density homes being built" are you referring to that are relevant to Evelyn station? Yes, some new homes have recently been built near Evelyn and Calderon, but it's closer (and more comfortable) to walk to the main train station than to Evelyn from there. And the "Mondrian" development on Evelyn east of 237 is more than half a mile from Evelyn Station, and is not large enough to generate much ridership. Let's say Mondrian is 150 homes... even if you assume 2 commuters per home and 20% of them take light rail (very unlikely) you're only talking about 60 extra riders which would still put Evelyn around the bottom of light rail stations.
Better to make the small sacrifice of losing Evelyn station for the much bigger gain of more reliable service, and possibly more frequent, express service for a lot more riders.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Bailey Park
- Blossom Valley
- Castro City
- Cuesta Park
- Jackson Park
- Monta Loma
- North Bayshore
- North Whisman
- Old Mountain View
- Rengstorff Park
- Rex Manor
- Shoreline West
- St. Francis Acres
- Stierlin Estates
- Sylvan Park
- The Crossings
- Waverly Park
- Whisman Station
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Draeger’s Los Altos eyes upgrades, expansion
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 3,353 views
Housing is for People
By Steve Levy | 33 comments | 2,334 views
College Visit: Lehigh and Lafayette
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 4 comments | 1,654 views
Is Coffee a Date?
By Laura Stec | 18 comments | 1,422 views
Gratitude, Repairing and Avoiding Affairs
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 652 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Mountain View
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
© 2015 Mountain View Online
All rights reserved.