Sign up for Express
New from the Voice, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Mountain View, California Forecast
TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN   BOOKS   ELECTIONS
  MOVIES OTHER ISSUES   RESTAURANTS   SCHOOLS & KIDS
  SPORTS   BIKE FUN   EDITOR'S DESK   EXTRA!CREDIT
  GOOGLE WATCH   HEY TECH!   KIDS IN TOW   PANTHER PEN
  SILICON AND SYNAPSE   TRIP TALK

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MESSAGE BOARD VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
NASA calls for more airfield users
Other Issues, posted by Editor, Mountain View Voice Online, on Oct 2, 2007 at 4:01 pm

NASA Ames official Steve Zornetzer told the City Council on Tuesday that its deal with the owners of Google to allow their Boeing 767 to land at Moffett may be the first of several deals like it, which will help pay for airfield operations.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, September 27, 2007, 4:00 PM

Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments

Posted by Carl Orta, a resident of another community, on Oct 2, 2007 at 4:01 pm

Here we go again. All neighboring city councils (Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Cupertino, Saratoga, Mountain view, Sunnyvale, maybe others) vigorously rejected the idea of commercial flights into and out of Moffett several years ago. The bases were, and still are, the severe increase in noise pollution over our homes, air traffic safety issues as stated by airline pilots concerning already crowded skies of traffic from/to San Francisco, Oakland and San Jose. It is well known that San Jose would dearly love to dump a lot of air cargo traffic onto Moffett in order to help counter resistance to their plans to continue their expansion plans. This latest plan would instigate a horrible rush to Moffett, it would open a flood gate of air traffic at the expense of our communities all for the benefit of the Nasa budget. Not fair, we will fight again.


Posted by Carl Orta, a resident of another community, on Oct 2, 2007 at 4:02 pm

Here we go again. All neighboring city councils (Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Cupertino, Saratoga, Mountain view, Sunnyvale, maybe others) vigorously rejected the idea of commercial flights into and out of Moffett several years ago. The bases were, and still are, the severe increase in noise pollution over our homes, air traffic safety issues as stated by airline pilots concerning already crowded skies of traffic from/to San Francisco, Oakland and San Jose. It is well known that San Jose would dearly love to dump a lot of air cargo traffic onto Moffett in order to help counter resistance to their plans to continue their expansion plans. This latest plan would instigate a horrible rush to Moffett, it would open a flood gate of air traffic at the expense of our communities all for the benefit of the Nasa budget. Not fair, we will fight again.


Posted by Henry, a resident of another community, on Mar 16, 2010 at 12:16 am

In the past 3 months, the air traffic over los altos hills has suddenly increased. We have planes flying in the morning, noon, and afternoon. Even at midnight and 2 am in the morning daily! What is going on? Why all this air traffic over LAH?


Posted by rem, a resident of another community, on Mar 16, 2010 at 11:55 am

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Leave Moffett along!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Posted by isThatG5LouderThanTheFreeway???, a resident of the Blossom Valley neighborhood, on Mar 16, 2010 at 10:30 pm

there is already an agreement in place between the cities (MV, Sunnyvale) that caps the number of operations allowed... I believe the current operations are well under that cap. Not sure NASA needs approval of the cities to add a few more flights. dangerous skies due to more moffett flights? please. the navy operating P3s around the clock was a significant bump, but nothing on the table approaches any safety concern due to overcrowding.

and a nit... larry ellison is right to have a beef with the SJC curfew. The airport is not closed when he lands late, it is closed to heavier aircraft like his fancy jet... even though most smaller aircraft that ARE allowed to land are significantly louder. FAA and airport authority noise regs are antiquated and do not work. When the FAA is spending millions of dollars soundproofing homes next to the I-280 soundwall in San Jose instead of modernizing the air traffic system, something is broke. and that something is policy.


Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

mv-voice.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.