Town Square

Post a New Topic

Educators applaud proposed changes to NCLB

Original post made on Feb 9, 2010

When President Barack Obama announced this year's budget on Feb. 1, it included a plan to reform the No Child Left Behind Act. Some local educators say those proposed changes are long overdue.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, February 9, 2010, 6:07 PM

Comments (2)

Like this comment
Posted by Enough!
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Feb 9, 2010 at 7:04 pm

No reason to celebrate here. This will mark the beginning of the end of education in CA. All NCLB asked for was that schools meet a minimum standard, that all kids would learn to read and write at grade level. Read between the lines of what Lairon states: Now MVWSD will not be held responsible for children being able to read and write. So many will fall through the cracks but be socially promoted up through the grades.

Like this comment
Posted by Parent
a resident of Waverly Park
on Feb 12, 2010 at 2:21 pm

You know, I just don't understand the people who say that ending "social promotion" is the answer to everything. Seems like one of those easy, black-and-white answers that are really not so easy.

Contrary to popular belief, kids do get retained in our school system. I have known several kids who repeated Kinder or 1st grade; usually because they were developmentally or socially less mature than the other kids in their grade. Sometimes they are young in chronological age; but other times they are the right age, but just less mature, hence less ready to learn. With the kids I have know who have done this, it has been a good move. Conversely, I have seen kids who are academically on track in their current class but are socially much less mature than the kids in their grade, and that is not always so good. It makes it hard to make friends.

I have also seen what happens when a kid was retained several times, and is 12 or 13 years old in 5th grade. Not pretty, for that student or for the other kids in the class. A 13-year-old does not belong in a classroom with 10-year-olds, they are simply not in the same place physically, socially or emotionally.

So if kids are behind their peers because of language issues, or learning issues, or whatever the issues, you just can't keep them in 3rd grade for 3 or 4 years until they "get" it. The social component -- being with peers who are at the same developmental level you are -- is very important. Image an 18-year-old freshman in high school. Eeek. Beside, I think what you would have by that time is an 18-year-old high school dropout, because they would not have been able to relate to the other students for so many years that school would be a complete disaster.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Should Parents Save for College?
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 12 comments | 2,517 views

Help! I’m Covered in Bugs
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 1,274 views

Constitution Guarantees Nationwide Right to Same-Sex Marriage
By Chandrama Anderson | 16 comments | 1,006 views

What Modern Science Has to Say About Age Old Wisdom
By Caroline Fleck | 0 comments | 226 views