Town Square

Post a New Topic

City won't buy houses behind McKelvey Park

Original post made on Mar 6, 2010

With a goal of possibly extending McKelvey Park, the City Council met in closed session last week to discuss purchasing five half-built houses behind the park, and decided not to.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, March 5, 2010, 11:07 AM

Comments (4)

Like this comment
Posted by localmom
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Mar 6, 2010 at 7:02 pm

The city should take the money and give it to the Mountain View Whishman school district as a one time grant in he future of its most vulnerable citizens. The schools are facing a multimillion dollar shortfall and next school year will see the largest class sizes in a decade. The city needs to HELP if there is money just sitting around to buy empty lots and forclosed homes!

Like this comment
Posted by John the Man
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Mar 8, 2010 at 6:02 pm

What? Puhleeze..... The MVWSD needs to better use what they already have. How about a little accountability on their part first?

Like this comment
Posted by localmom
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Mar 8, 2010 at 10:03 pm

Just a point of information: California schools are the 47th WORST FUNDED in the NATION. This was in Friday's Chron in an article about how CA was passed over for the Obama "Race to the Top" billions in school funding.

MVWSD does an incredible amount to stretch every tiny penny that comes its way. When you are given only $8,000 or so per child/year and kids in comparable communities (Philly: $12,000, Philly suburb Lower Merion, PA: $21,000---every child takes home a mac!), then it really is prudent to ask oneself, perhaps we can't expect much from a district that is so DRASTICALLY underfunded. Enough said.

Like this comment
Posted by Robert
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Mar 10, 2010 at 10:09 pm

Why not buy the houses?... In these difficult fiscal times the City has already spent around $20 million on land at Moffet and 101; about $2 million on a church on Escuela; over $10 million on a new fire station. But hey let's cut City services and let's blame the City employees and labor groups for the City's "financial woes". Granted things need to be tightened up but don't believe the sky is falling rhetoric and certainly don't blame out City's employees... that's just what the "leaders" want you to do.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

The Saddle Room – A True Friend of Kids
By Laura Stec | 2 comments | 2,070 views

Palo Alto: Pastis owner to open second French restaurant
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 1,224 views

The Four E's--Pope Francis and the Middle Class
By Steve Levy | 3 comments | 957 views

My College Mindset is Intrinsically Motivated
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 829 views

Radical Acceptance
By Caroline Fleck | 0 comments | 245 views