Enrollment jumps at MV Whisman Schools & Kids, posted by Editor, Mountain View Voice Online, on Sep 24, 2010 at 3:58 pm
Enrollment is up substantially this fall at local elementary and middle schools. Officials speculate that the marked -- and unanticipated -- rise is due, in part, to an influx of military families moving into Moffett Field housing, as well as fewer fifth-graders than usual leaving the district.
Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, September 24, 2010, 12:15 PM
Posted by Margot, a resident of the Waverly Park neighborhood, on Sep 24, 2010 at 10:27 pm
I don't understand why the district is always so underprepared!! Isn't this lack of planning part of what led to the premature closing of Slater? The city and the school district do not seem to be able to work together to coordinate the implications of the growth. I certainly don't plan to vote for any more city council members who want more housing if there's no plan for the additional students that it will bring!
Posted by MV Mom, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Sep 25, 2010 at 11:27 pm
Margot, I agree about the city council elections. I won't be voting for some of the incumbents I had previously voted for. The situation with district office is getting ridiculous, schools are just as crowded as ever and it is only going to get worse. I volunteer in classrooms, donate to our school and to MVEF. I'm not sure what else I can do.
Posted by John the man, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Sep 26, 2010 at 8:29 pm
Margot, the reason why school districts are seemingly unprepared each fall for enrollment is because parents often don't enroll their children until the very first day of school. The school district simply doesn't know they are coming because parents can't be bothered to let the district know beforehand.
Posted by Mark, a resident of the Monta Loma neighborhood, on Sep 26, 2010 at 9:25 pm
Why are they so unprepared? Cuts to funding! Schwarzenegger has cut education beyond the bare bones. In 2009, California was DEAD LAST in per-pupil funding! Some 60,000 elementary and high school teachers have been cut state-wide in the past 2 years, and Meg Whitman wants to cut 100,000 more.
Schools can't accommodate the students they already have, let alone new enrollment, if cuts continue.
Posted by James, a resident of the Whisman Station neighborhood, on Sep 27, 2010 at 10:47 am
Most large tech companies (Google, Apple, HP, Microsoft, etc. )encourage their employees volunteer in the community, including matching hours with cash donations. It's not a big deal for Joe/Jane Programmer to arrive late one day a week after volunteering since techies tend to work odd hours anyway.
Posted by Military Mom, a resident of the North Whisman neighborhood, on Sep 27, 2010 at 10:26 pm
Officials speculate that the marked -- and unanticipated -- rise is due, in part, to an influx of military families moving into Moffett Field housing"
I seriously doubt it's military families that are slow to enroll their kids in schools! The military has extensive family support plans and sponsorships to plan for where their kids will go to school the following year.
For Totter to pull out a canned military family excuse is just lame and shameful.
The story always missed is that the district receives extra funding for military students. It all gets thrown into the general fund and we never see any benefits from it.
Posted by jane, a resident of the North Whisman neighborhood, on Sep 28, 2010 at 4:21 pm
It is not the City Council that makes the decision to close schools. The School Board made the decision to close Slater even with rooms packed with people disputing projected enrollement figures etc. etc. etc. So please don't confuse the power to close schools or project enrollment with jobs within City Council - that rests squarely on the shoulders of the School Board, which is also the boss of the Superintendent. The School Board closed Slater and now needs portables to house students while receiving $300K annually for leasing the Slater site. THe School Board closed WhHisman School as well. Crowded schools with traffic congestion and students in portables...don't like it? Don't re-elect the School Board.
Posted by Steve, a resident of the Rex Manor neighborhood, on Sep 29, 2010 at 11:52 am
As I recall from my kids' elementary days (before the Navy left Moffett), Federal students need to be a minimum percentage of total student population before any specific aid kicks in. The district lost that revenue source once, and will likely be glad when it returns, but next year's funding is based on this year's students, so if new military families were not here last year, there is no new money for them yet this year. As MVWSD is now "basic aid", revenue does not increase with increasing student population.
BTW--Closing Slater is old news, and I believe the lease income is higher and funds current programming.
Posted by Parent, a resident of the Waverly Park neighborhood, on Sep 29, 2010 at 2:15 pm
"The School Board closed Whisman School as well. Crowded schools with traffic congestion and students in portables...don't like it? Don't re-elect the School Board." It was the Whisman district board, to be precise, not the merged district board. Those people are long gone, as are most of the people who were on the school board when Slater was closed. So you can blame the current school board all you want, but that's kind of like blaming Obama for the war in Iraq. The Whisman district closed Whisman because that was when the Navy was pulling out of Moffett. A very large majority of the students at Whisman at that time were from Navy families, and when they left, there was not enough enrollment in the old Whisman District at that time to justify keeping 3 elementary schools open.
Posted by MV Mom, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Sep 29, 2010 at 3:22 pm
I'd love to vote out the current school board, but there is no one running against them. Which is a shame, I'd love to see current MVWSD parents running.
And I do think the city council takes some blame, they are the ones pushing through large developments (Minton's site) without regard to the current state of schools. It's become the norm here to slap down portables and pretend they are a real building. I also blame the council for the two tax districts diverting funds from schools (Shoreline and downtown).