Town Square

Post a New Topic

LASD parcel tax passing narrowly

Original post made on May 4, 2011

As the polls closed May 3, Measure E, a new $193 annual parcel tax to benefit local schools, had the votes to pass and its proponents were optimistic. However, at least one opponent of the proposal is holding out hope that last-minute ballots will dash the two-thirds majority it needs to pass.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 10:12 PM

Comments (10)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Just Wondering
a resident of Castro City
on May 4, 2011 at 2:24 pm

As a person without kids how would I know if I live in the district in question? Some kids go to this school, some kids go to that school. I read about kids having to travel accross town when there are schools closer to where they live, make no sense and the poeple asking for the money never spelled out who percisly takes the hit.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by @Just Wondering
a resident of Waverly Park
on May 4, 2011 at 3:00 pm

If you're a registered voter and you got the ballot in the mail then you're in that district. If you didn't get the ballot then you're not.

If you're in Castro City then you're not in that district.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by bikes2work
a resident of The Crossings
on May 4, 2011 at 6:40 pm

As of 5pm today, the updated results show that the measure is passing by a mere 0.09 percent. That is one extremely thin margin. Next update at 5pm on Friday. LASD should at least now realize that a lot of people are not pleased with their fiscal performance.

Is time for a Prop 218 ballot petition to try and overturn the existing $597 parcel tax? Ron, I'm ready to sign it.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by bikes2work
a resident of The Crossings
on May 4, 2011 at 6:45 pm

Correction: The measure is passing by 0.48 percent. I was thinking 67.0 was the cut off, but it is 66.7. The YES votes currently have 67.08 percent.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ron Haley
a resident of another community
on May 4, 2011 at 7:36 pm

Manual recount first! We need to turn 57 Yes to No!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by localmom
a resident of Cuesta Park
on May 6, 2011 at 10:02 am

This additional revenue for LASD is GOOD for Bullis Charter school, as there is a serious threat of increased class sizes w/o the extra cushion, and BCS would then be offered fewer classroom spaces as well. Not to mention that 90% fo BCS kids live in LASD and their parents' home values are at stake. A house in the Mtn View Whisman elementary district of similar size and lot dimensions will sell for 1/3 to 1/2 LESS than in Los Altos. This has nothing to do w/the quaint village atmosphere, and EVERYTHING to do with the fact that the schools are ranked #1 in the state. Folks, on the east coast, public schools in communities similar to Los Altos (Westport, CT, etc), spend $14K/student/year. Even with the new parcel tax, LASD is spending about $4 K LESS per student per year (as is the charter school) as California has a different, and very punitive, funding mechanism for high net worth communities. The only way to stay competetive both statewide and nationwide is to attempt to fund our schools in a comparable way. The kids in LASD eat outside under trees, have 40 plus kids in music classes in the middle school, and no buses. They are NOT spoiled, and the teachers are not sucking the district dry. Around the country, salaries make up 80% of more of costs, this is a fact. Go to ncs.ed.gov to get the facts on school funding. You will be APPALLED at how little we spend out here relative to the rest of the country. It is emabarrasing given our relative wealth and a disservice to the children.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Huh?
a resident of Whisman Station
on May 6, 2011 at 10:21 am

"A house in the Mtn View Whisman elementary district of similar size and lot dimensions will sell for 1/3 to 1/2 LESS than in Los Altos."

That is simply not true based on my own experience.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Observer
a resident of another community
on May 6, 2011 at 2:46 pm

I don't think it's 1/3 and definitely not 1/2, but Los Altos School District homes do sell for more than an apples-to-apples counterpart in MVWSD. For instance, you might pay the around same for a 1800-sq ft 3 bedroom/2 bath in Varsity Park (Springer, LASD) than a 2200-sq ft 4 bedroom/2.5 bath in Waverly Park (Huff, MVWSD).


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Doug Pearson
a resident of Blossom Valley
on May 7, 2011 at 10:51 pm

This article ends, "The Santa Clara County elections office reported Tuesday night that the vote is 8,977 in favor to 4,354 opposed, with all 16 precincts reporting. An updated tally is due at 5 p.m. Wednesday, May 4."

The printed version ends, "The Santa Clara County elections office reported Wednesday afternoon that the vote is 9,187 in favor to 4,509 opposed, with all 16 precincts reporting. An updated tally is due by 5 p.m. Friday, May 6. Check www.mv-voice.com for an updated story."

OK, so where is the updated story?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Parent of a Cupertino kid
a resident of another community
on May 8, 2011 at 4:19 pm

Ron - since you keep saying the problem is how LASD mismanaged it's funds I'd be interested in how you would do a better job and how the charter manages. What is Wanny's salary, pension, benefit package, and extras (housing etc)? What are the teachers paid? How often are your classrooms cleaned and do use staff or a professional cleaning service? How do you provide for special needs students, ELL students, poor dtudents? f these are issues that you have problems with at lasd, how is the charter different?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Cho's, beloved dim sum spot, to reopen in Los Altos
By Elena Kadvany | 8 comments | 5,550 views

Where DO The Elite Meet?
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 2,755 views

Why I Became Active in Palo Alto Forward
By Steve Levy | 10 comments | 2,114 views

Early Decision Blues
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 1,605 views

With a Perspective....
By Ms. Jenson | 0 comments | 343 views