Town Square

Post a New Topic

Synthetic beats real in turf debate

Original post made on Oct 13, 2011

The sentiment was all but unanimous in Tuesday's City Council study session that three city ball fields should use artificial turf instead of the real thing.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, October 13, 2011, 12:13 PM

Comments (5)

Posted by Rossta, a resident of Waverly Park
on Oct 13, 2011 at 2:31 pm

Rossta is a registered user.

Interesting that no one in the article mentioned talking to any of the actual users of the fields. I did - I asked my 11 year old son who attends Graham and played soccer there last year. He really doesn't like the artificial turf - he says it hurts to fall on.

If you wouldn't want to picnic on it, do you think playing on it is somehow okay? I guess the point of that is - I won't be using it, so it is good for others.

Posted by Stephan H., a resident of Rex Manor
on Oct 13, 2011 at 6:06 pm

As a dog owner local to Crittendon, with its conveniently enclosed grass field, I don't recall being consulted either. We and our dogs love having a grassy field to romp in. We can and do clean up droppings to the point where the soil and grass, with routine watering, can absorb any residue very well. I have no idea how any residue would ever "decompose" to harmlessness in AstroTurf. (Can it leach into the underlying soil? What enzyme or chemical sprays should we tote to hasten the process? How will they affect the VOC emissions?) Instead, I can already see the "Dogs Must Be On Leash" signs replaced by "No Dogs Allowed" (after the damage is done). The new signs, however, will no doubt be enforced. Oh now I get it: Another revenue stream!

Posted by Observer, a resident of Old Mountain View
on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:45 pm

So this is what going green really means. Artificial grass over real nature. And it doesn't look like the owl stands a chance against the city.

Posted by Richard, a resident of another community
on Oct 14, 2011 at 9:14 am

You can use "Turf" 365 days a year in all kinds of weather. There are no rainouts due to field conditions. It is a more consistent playing surface with no holes or dirt areas. You don't have to close the field for 3 months each year for renovation. You don't have to water it, fertalize it or mow it. It may cost more up front but pays for itself in the long run and will actually save money. The biggest benefit is that it allows more people and teams to use the fields. If we had unlimited field space and unlimited budgets grass would be great - but we don't.

Posted by Old Ben, a resident of Shoreline West
on Oct 14, 2011 at 11:06 am

Make sure that the supplier of this artificial turf has absolutely zero connection to those that approve it. This smells fishy.

If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

The dress code
By Jessica T | 21 comments | 1,903 views

September food and drink goings on
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 1,319 views

. . . People will never forget how you made them feel.
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,259 views

College Freshmen: Avoiding the Pitfalls
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 1,134 views

Camp Glamp
By Laura Stec | 6 comments | 1,064 views